Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Car Repair Costs Listed below are repair costs (in dollars) for cars crashed at 6 mi/h in full-front crash tests and the same cars crashed at 6 mi/h in full-rear crash tests (based on data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety). The cars are the Toyota Camry, Mazda 6, Volvo S40, Saturn Aura, Subaru Legacy, Hyundai Sonata, and Honda Accord. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the repair costs from full-front crashes and full-rear crashes?

Front

936

978

2252

1032

3911

4312

3469

Rear

1480

1202

802

3191

1122

739

2767

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear correlation between the repair costs from full-front car crashes and full rear car crashes.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The repair costs are tabulated for cars crashed at 6 mi/h in full-front crashes and for cars crashed at 6mi/h in full rear crashes.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is as follows:

There is no linear correlation between the repair costs of two different crashes.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

There is a linear correlation between the repair costs of two different crashes.

03

Correlation coefficient

Let x denote the repair costs of cars crashed at six mi/h in full-front crashes.

Let y denote the repair costs of cars crashed at six mi/h in full rear crashes.

Here, n is equal to 7.

The formula for computing the correlation coefficient (r) is as follows:

\(r = \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\)

The following calculations are done to compute the value of r:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

\({y^2}\)

936

1480

1385280

876096

2190400

978

1202

1175556

956484

1444804

2252

802

1806104

5071504

643204

1032

3191

3293112

1065024

10182481

3911

1122

4388142

15295921

1258884

4312

739

3186568

18593344

546121

3469

2767

9598723

12033961

7656289

\(\sum x \)=16890

\(\sum y \)=11303

\(\sum {xy} \)=24833485

\(\sum {{x^2}} \)=53892334

\(\sum {{y^2}} \)=23922183

Substituting the above values, the following value of r is obtained:

\[\begin{aligned}{c}r = \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\\ = \frac{{7\left( {24833485} \right) - \left( {16890} \right)\left( {11303} \right)}}{{\sqrt {7\left( {53892334} \right) - {{\left( {16890} \right)}^2}} \sqrt {7\left( {23922183} \right) - {{\left( {11303} \right)}^2}} }}\\ = - 0.283\end{aligned}\]

Therefore, the value of r is equal to -0.283.

04

Test statistic, critical value of r and conclusion of the test

The test statistic value is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}t = \frac{r}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {r^2}}}{{n - 2}}} }}\;\;\; \sim {t_{\left( {n - 2} \right)}}\\ = \frac{{ - 0.283}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {{\left( { - 0.283} \right)}^2}}}{{7 - 2}}} }}\\ = - 0.659\end{aligned}\)

Here, n=7.

The degrees of freedom are computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = n - 2\\ = 7 - 2\\ = 5\end{aligned}\)

The critical correlation value of r for\(\alpha = 0.05\)and degrees of freedom equal to 5 is equal to 0.754.

The p-value obtained dusing the test statistic is equal to 0.539.

Since the absolute value of the test statistic is less than the critical value and the p-value is greater than 0.05, so the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, there is no linear correlation between the repair costs of the two types of car crashes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table below includes results from polygraph (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers Charles R. Honts (Boise State University) and Gordon H. Barland (Department of Defense Polygraph Institute). In each case, it was known if the subject lied or did not lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truths and lies?

Did the subject Actually Lie?


No (Did Not Lie)

Yes (Lied)

Polygraph test indicates that the subject lied.


15

42

Polygraph test indicates that the subject did not lied.


32

9

Probability Refer to the results from the 150 subjects in Cumulative Review Exercise 5.

a.Find the probability that if 1 of the 150 subjects is randomly selected, the result is a woman who spent the money.

b.Find the probability that if 1 of the 150 subjects is randomly selected, the result is a woman who spent the money or was given a single 100-yuan bill.

c.If two different women are randomly selected, find the probability that they both spent the money.

Bias in Clinical Trials? Researchers investigated the issue of race and equality of access to clinical trials. The following table shows the population distribution and the numbers of participants in clinical trials involving lung cancer (based on data from โ€œParticipation in Cancer Clinical Trials,โ€ by Murthy, Krumholz, and Gross, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 22). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the distribution of clinical trial participants fits well with the population distribution. Is there a race/ethnic group that appears to be very underrepresented?

Race/ethnicity

White

non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Black

Asian/

Pacific

Islander

American Indian/

Alaskan Native

Distribution of

Population

75.6%

9.1%

10.8%

3.8%

0.7%

Number in Lung

Cancer Clinical Trials

3855

60

316

54

12

Cybersecurity The accompanying Statdisk results shown in the margin are obtained from the data given in Exercise 1. What should be concluded when testing the claim that the leading digits have a distribution that fits well with Benfordโ€™s law?

Using Yatesโ€™s Correction for Continuity The chi-square distribution is continuous, whereas the test statistic used in this section is discrete. Some statisticians use Yatesโ€™s correction for continuity in cells with an expected frequency of less than 10 or in all cells of a contingency table with two rows and two columns. With Yatesโ€™s correction, we replace

\(\sum \frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)with \(\sum \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {O - E} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

Given the contingency table in Exercise 9 โ€œFour Quarters the Same as $1?โ€ find the value of the test \({\chi ^2}\)statistic using Yatesโ€™s correction in all cells. What effect does Yatesโ€™s correction have?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free