Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Loaded Die The author drilled a hole in a die and filled it with a lead weight, then proceeded to roll it 200 times. Here are the observed frequencies for the outcomes of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively: 27, 31, 42, 40, 28, and 32. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the outcomes are not equally likely. Does it appear that the loaded die behaves differently than a fair die?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to conclude that theoutcomes are not equally likely.

This indicates that the loaded die is not different from a fair die.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A loaded die is rolled 200 times, and the outcomes on the die are recorded each time.

02

Check the requirements for the test

Assume the sample data is taken from larger population. Also, since the frequency counts are tested and if each expected frequency is at least 5, the requirements of the test are met.

The expected values are computed as,

Let E denote the expected frequencies of the outcomes.

It is expected that the die is fair.

Therefore, the probability of occurrence of each outcome should be equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p = \frac{1}{6}\\ = 0.16667\end{aligned}\)

Since the die is rolled 200 times,\(n = 200\).

Now, the expected frequency for all the six outcomes is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = np\\ = 200\left( {\frac{1}{6}} \right)\\ = 33.3333\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the chi-square test is applicable.

03

Conduct the hypothesis test

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

\({H_o}:{p_1} = {p_2} = {p_3} = {p_4} = {p_5} = {p_6}\)

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

\({H_a}:\)At least one proportion is not equal to the others.

The test is right-tailed.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the outcomes.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_1} = 27\\{O_2} = 31\\{O_3} = 42\\{O_4} = 40\\{O_5} = 28\\{O_6} = 32\end{aligned}\)

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Outcome

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

1

27

33.33333

-6.33333

40.11111

1.203333

2

31

33.33333

-2.33333

5.444444

0.163333

3

42

33.33333

8.666667

75.11111

2.253333

4

40

33.33333

6.666667

44.44444

1.333333

5

28

33.33333

-5.33333

28.44444

0.853333

6

32

33.33333

-1.33333

1.777778

0.053333

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = 1.203333 + 0.163333 + ...... + 0.053333\\ = 5.86\end{aligned}\)

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 5.86\).

For 6 outcomes, k is equal to 6.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 6 - 1\\ = 5\end{aligned}\)

04

Make a decision

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 5 degrees of freedom is equal to 11.0705.

The p-value is computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 5.86} \right)\\ = 0.3201\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is less than the critical value and the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

05

State the conclusion

There is not enough evidence to conclude that the outcomes are not equally likely.

A die is fair if all the outcomes are equally likely. The result indicates that the loaded die is not different from a fair die.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Questions 6โ€“10 refer to the sample data in the following table, which describes the fate of the passengers and crew aboard the Titanic when it sank on April 15, 1912. Assume that the data are a sample from a large population and we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that surviving is independent of whether the person is a man, woman, boy, or girl.


Men

Women

Boys

Girls

Survived

332

318

29

27

Died

1360

104

35

18

Given that the P-value for the hypothesis test is 0.000 when rounded to three decimal places, what do you conclude? What do the results indicate about the rule that women and children should be the first to be saved?

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age,

researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table (based on data from โ€œTexting While Driving and Other Risky Motor Vehicle Behaviors Among U.S. High School Students,โ€ by Oโ€™Malley, Shults, and Eaton, Pediatrics,Vol. 131, No. 6). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and irregular seat belt use. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other?


Irregular Seat Belt Use?


Yes

No

Texted while driving

1737

2048

No Texting while driving

1945

2775

A study of seat belt users andnonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in the given table (based on data from โ€œWhat Kinds of People Do Not Use Seat Belts?โ€ by Helsing and Comstock, American Journal of Public Health,Vol. 67, No. 11). Test the claim that the amount of smoking is independent of seat belt use. A plausible theory is that people who smoke more are lessconcerned about their health and safety and are therefore less inclined to wear seat belts. Is this theory supported by the sample data?

Number of Cigarettes Smoked per Day

0

1-14

15-34

35 and over

Wear Seat Belts

175

20

42

6

Don't Wear Seat Belts

149

17

41

9

Benfordโ€™s Law. According to Benfordโ€™s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21โ€“24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benfordโ€™s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Authorโ€™s Computer Files The author recorded the leading digits of the sizes of the electronic document files for the current edition of this book. The leading digits have frequencies of 55, 25, 17, 24, 18, 12, 12, 3, and 4 (corresponding to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively). Using a 0.05 significance level, test for goodness-of-fit with Benfordโ€™s law.

Exercises 1โ€“5 refer to the sample data in the following table, which summarizes the last digits of the heights (cm) of 300 randomly selected subjects (from Data Set 1 โ€œBody Dataโ€ in Appendix B). Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the data are from a population having the property that the last digits are all equally likely.

Last Digit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Frequency

30

35

24

25

35

36

37

27

27

24

When testing the claim in Exercise 1, what are the observed and expected frequencies for the last digit of 7?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free