Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Loaded Die The author drilled a hole in a die and filled it with a lead weight, then proceeded to roll it 200 times. Here are the observed frequencies for the outcomes of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively: 27, 31, 42, 40, 28, and 32. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the outcomes are not equally likely. Does it appear that the loaded die behaves differently than a fair die?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to conclude that theoutcomes are not equally likely.

This indicates that the loaded die is not different from a fair die.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A loaded die is rolled 200 times, and the outcomes on the die are recorded each time.

02

Check the requirements for the test

Assume the sample data is taken from larger population. Also, since the frequency counts are tested and if each expected frequency is at least 5, the requirements of the test are met.

The expected values are computed as,

Let E denote the expected frequencies of the outcomes.

It is expected that the die is fair.

Therefore, the probability of occurrence of each outcome should be equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p = \frac{1}{6}\\ = 0.16667\end{aligned}\)

Since the die is rolled 200 times,\(n = 200\).

Now, the expected frequency for all the six outcomes is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = np\\ = 200\left( {\frac{1}{6}} \right)\\ = 33.3333\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the chi-square test is applicable.

03

Conduct the hypothesis test

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

\({H_o}:{p_1} = {p_2} = {p_3} = {p_4} = {p_5} = {p_6}\)

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

\({H_a}:\)At least one proportion is not equal to the others.

The test is right-tailed.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the outcomes.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_1} = 27\\{O_2} = 31\\{O_3} = 42\\{O_4} = 40\\{O_5} = 28\\{O_6} = 32\end{aligned}\)

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Outcome

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

1

27

33.33333

-6.33333

40.11111

1.203333

2

31

33.33333

-2.33333

5.444444

0.163333

3

42

33.33333

8.666667

75.11111

2.253333

4

40

33.33333

6.666667

44.44444

1.333333

5

28

33.33333

-5.33333

28.44444

0.853333

6

32

33.33333

-1.33333

1.777778

0.053333

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = 1.203333 + 0.163333 + ...... + 0.053333\\ = 5.86\end{aligned}\)

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 5.86\).

For 6 outcomes, k is equal to 6.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 6 - 1\\ = 5\end{aligned}\)

04

Make a decision

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 5 degrees of freedom is equal to 11.0705.

The p-value is computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 5.86} \right)\\ = 0.3201\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is less than the critical value and the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

05

State the conclusion

There is not enough evidence to conclude that the outcomes are not equally likely.

A die is fair if all the outcomes are equally likely. The result indicates that the loaded die is not different from a fair die.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 5โ€“20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Kentucky Derby The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions through the 141st running of the Kentucky Derby horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside rail, so the horse in that position has the shortest distance to run. (Because the number of horses varies from year to year, only the first 10 post positions are included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse racing in the Kentucky Derby?

Post Position

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Wins

19

14

11

15

15

7

8

12

5

11

Critical Thinking: Was Allstate wrong? The Allstate insurance company once issued a press release listing zodiac signs along with the corresponding numbers of automobile crashes, as shown in the first and last columns in the table below. In the original press release, Allstate included comments such as one stating that Virgos are worried and shy, and they were involved in 211,650 accidents, making them the worst offenders. Allstate quickly issued an apology and retraction. In a press release, Allstate included this: โ€œAstrological signs have absolutely no role in how we base coverage and set rates. Rating by astrology would not be actuarially sound.โ€

Analyzing the Results The original Allstate press release did not include the lengths (days) of the different zodiac signs. The preceding table lists those lengths in the third column. A reasonable explanation for the different numbers of crashes is that they should be proportional to the lengths of the zodiac signs. For example, people are born under the Capricorn sign on 29 days out of the 365 days in the year, so they are expected to have 29/365 of the total number of crashes. Use the methods of this chapter to determine whether this appears to explain the results in the table. Write a brief report of your findings.

Zodiac sign

Dates

Length(days)

Crashes

Capricorn

Jan.18-Feb. 15

29

128,005

Aquarius

Feb.16-March 11

24

106,878

Pisces

March 12-April 16

36

172,030

Aries

April 17-May 13

27

112,402

Taurus

May 14-June 19

37

177,503

Gemini

June 20-July 20

31

136,904

Cancer

July21-Aug.9

20

101,539

Leo

Aug.10-Sep.15

37

179,657

Virgo

Sep.16-Oct.30

45

211,650

Libra

Oct.31-Nov 22

23

110,592

Scorpio

Nov. 23-Nov. 28

6

26,833

Ophiuchus

Nov.29-Dec.17

19

83,234

Sagittarius

Dec.18-Jan.17

31

154,477

In Exercises 1โ€“4, use the following listed arrival delay times (minutes) for American Airline flights from New York to Los Angeles. Negative values correspond to flights that arrived early. Also shown are the SPSS results for analysis of variance. Assume that we plan to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the different flights have the same mean arrival delay time.

Flight 1

-32

-25

-26

-6

5

-15

-17

-36

Flight 19

-5

-32

-13

-9

-19

49

-30

-23

Flight 21

-23

28

103

-19

-5

-46

13

-3

Test Statistic What is the value of the test statistic? What distribution is used with the test statistic?

In Exercises 5โ€“20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and , or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Testing a Slot Machine The author purchased a slot machine (Bally Model 809) and tested it by playing it 1197 times. There are 10 different categories of outcomes, including no win, win jackpot, win with three bells, and so on. When testing the claim that the observed outcomes agree with the expected frequencies, the author obtained a test statistic of\({\chi ^2} = 8.185\). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual outcomes agree with the expected frequencies. Does the slot machine appear to be functioning as expected?

Forward Grip Reach and Ergonomics When designing cars and aircraft, we must consider the forward grip reach of women. Women have normally distributed forward grip reaches with a mean of 686 mm and a standard deviation of 34 mm (based on anthropometric survey data from Gordon, Churchill, et al.).

a. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by 95% of women, what is the shortest forward grip reach that can access the dashboard?

b. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by women with a grip reach greater than 650 mm, what percentage of women cannot reach the dashboard? Is that percentage too high?

c. Find the probability that 16 randomly selected women have forward grip reaches with a mean greater than 680 mm. Does this result have any effect on the design?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free