Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table (based on data from “Texting While Driving and Other Risky Motor Vehicle Behaviors Among U.S. High School Students,” by O’Malley, Shults, and Eaton, Pediatrics,Vol. 131, No. 6). Use a 0.05 significance level to

test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other?


Drove when drinking Alcohol?


Yes

No

Texted while driving

731

3054

No Texting while driving

156

4564

Short Answer

Expert verified

Texting while driving and driving while drunk are dependent behaviours of driving.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The data forthe counts of subjects whotext while driving and who drive while drunk is provided.

The level of significance is 0.05.

02

Compute the expected frequencies

Theformula forexpected frequencyis,

\(E = \frac{{\left( {row\;total} \right)\left( {column\;total} \right)}}{{\left( {grand\;total} \right)}}\)

The table for observed frequencies with row and column total is represented as,


Drove when drinking Alcohol?



Yes

No

Row total

Texted while driving

731

3054

3785

No Texting while driving

156

4564

4720

Column total

887

7618

8505

The table for expected frequency is represented as,


Drove when drinking Alcohol?


Yes

No

Texted while driving

394.744

3390.256

No Texting while driving

492.256

4227.744

Each of the expected value is greater than 5. It is assumed that the subjects are selected randomly.

03

State the null and alternate hypothesis

\({H_0}:\)Texting while driving and driving while drunk are independent.

\({H_1}:\)Texting while driving and driving while drunk are dependent.

04

Compute the test statistic

The value of the test statisticis computed as,

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = \frac{{{{\left( {731 - 394.744} \right)}^2}}}{{394.744}} + \frac{{{{\left( {3054 - 3390.256} \right)}^2}}}{{3390.256}} + ... + \frac{{{{\left( {4564 - 4227.744} \right)}^2}}}{{4227.744}}\\ = 576.224\end{aligned}\]

Therefore, the value of the test statistic is 576.224.

05

Compute the degrees of freedom

The degrees of freedomare computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right) = \left( {2 - 1} \right)\left( {2 - 1} \right)\\ = 1\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the degrees of freedom are 1.

06

Compute the critical value

From chi-square table, the critical value for row corresponding to 1 degree of freedom at 0.05 level of significance is 3.841.

Therefore, the critical value is 3.841.

Also, the p-value is computed as 0.000.

07

State the decision

Since the critical (3.841) is less than the value of test statistic (576.224). In this case, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

08

State the conclusion

There is not enough evidenceto support the claim that the two behaviours; textingwhile driving and driving while drunk with alcohol are independent.

Thus, it can be concluded that two risky behaviours are dependent on each other.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of splinting versus surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Results are given in the table below (based on data from “Splinting vs. Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome,” by Gerritsen et al., Journal of the American Medical Association,Vol. 288,

No. 10). The results are based on evaluations made one year after the treatment. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that success is independent of the type of treatment. What do the results suggest about treating carpal tunnel syndrome?

Successful Treatment

Unsuccessful Treatment

Splint Treatment

60

23

Surgery Treatment

67

6

Chocolate and Happiness Use the results from part (b) of Cumulative Review Exercise 2 to construct a 99% confidence interval estimate of the percentage of women who say that chocolate makes them happier. Write a brief statement interpreting the result.

Benford’s Law. According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Author’s Computer Files The author recorded the leading digits of the sizes of the electronic document files for the current edition of this book. The leading digits have frequencies of 55, 25, 17, 24, 18, 12, 12, 3, and 4 (corresponding to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively). Using a 0.05 significance level, test for goodness-of-fit with Benford’s law.

Loaded Die The author drilled a hole in a die and filled it with a lead weight, then proceeded to roll it 200 times. Here are the observed frequencies for the outcomes of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively: 27, 31, 42, 40, 28, and 32. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the outcomes are not equally likely. Does it appear that the loaded die behaves differently than a fair die?

Exercises 1–5 refer to the sample data in the following table, which summarizes the last digits of the heights (cm) of 300 randomly selected subjects (from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B). Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the data are from a population having the property that the last digits are all equally likely.

Last Digit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Frequency

30

35

24

25

35

36

37

27

27

24

What are the null and alternative hypotheses corresponding to the stated claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free