Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Using Yates’s Correction for Continuity The chi-square distribution is continuous, whereas the test statistic used in this section is discrete. Some statisticians use Yates’s correction for continuity in cells with an expected frequency of less than 10 or in all cells of a contingency table with two rows and two columns. With Yates’s correction, we replace

\(\sum \frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)with \(\sum \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {O - E} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

Given the contingency table in Exercise 9 “Four Quarters the Same as $1?” find the value of the test \({\chi ^2}\)statistic using Yates’s correction in all cells. What effect does Yates’s correction have?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The value of the \({\chi ^2}\) test statistic using the Yates’s correction factor is equal to 10.717.

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim that whether students purchased gum or kept the money is independent of whether they were given four quarters or a $1 bill.

The effect of Yates’s correction factor is that the test statistic value decreases as compared to the test statistic value computed without using any correction factor.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data are given on the number of students who spent/kept the money given that they were given four quarters and a $1 bill.

02

Hypotheses

Null Hypothesis: The act of spending/keeping the money is independent of whether the students were given four quarters or a $1 bill.

Alternative Hypothesis: The act of spending/keeping the money is not independent of whether the students were given four quarters or a $1 bill.

03

Observed frequencies

The following table shows the observed frequencies:

Purchased Gum

Kept the Money

Students given four Quarters

\({O_1} = \)27

\({O_2} = \)16

Students Given $1 Bill

\({O_3} = \)12

\({O_4} = \)34

04

Calculation of expected frequencies

The following table shows the row totals and column totals:

Purchased Gum

Kept the Money

Row Total

Students given four Quarters

27

16

43

Students Given $1 Bill

12

34

46

Column total

39

50

89

The expected frequencies are computed using the given formula:

\({\rm{Expected}}\;{\rm{Frequency}} = \frac{{{\rm{Row}}\;{\rm{Total}} \times {\rm{Column}}\;{\rm{Total}}}}{{{\rm{Grand}}\;{\rm{Total}}}}\)

The following table shows the expected frequencies:

Purchased Gum

Kept the Money

Students given four Quarters

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_1} = \frac{{43 \times 39}}{{89}}\\ = 18.84\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_2} = \frac{{43 \times 50}}{{89}}\\ = 24.16\end{aligned}\)

Students Given $1 Bill

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_3} = \frac{{46 \times 39}}{{89}}\\ = 20.16\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_4} = \frac{{46 \times 50}}{{89}}\\ = 25.84\end{aligned}\)

05

Calculation of the test statistic

The test statistic with Yates’s correction factor is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {O - E} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{E}\;\;\;\;\chi _{\left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right)}^2\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {27 - 18.84} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{18.84}} + \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {16 - 24.16} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{24.16}} + \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {12 - 20.16} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{20.16}} + \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {34 - 25.84} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{25.84}}\\ = 10.717\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of test statistic is 10.717.

The test statistic with Yates’s correction factor is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {O - E} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{E}\;\;\;\;\chi _{\left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right)}^2\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {27 - 18.84} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{18.84}} + \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {16 - 24.16} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{24.16}} + \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {12 - 20.16} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{20.16}} + \frac{{{{\left( {\left| {34 - 25.84} \right| - 0.5} \right)}^2}}}{{25.84}}\\ = 10.717\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of test statistic is 10.717.

06

Calculation of the critical value

The level of significance is 0.05.

The degrees of freedom is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = \left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right)\\ = \left( {2 - 1} \right)\left( {2 - 1} \right)\\ = 1\end{aligned}\)

Now look at the \({\chi ^2}\) distribution table for 1 degrees of freedom with 0.05 significance level.

The critical value is 3.842.

07

Conclusion of the test

The calculated value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Thus, there is sufficient evidence to reject the claim that whether students purchased gum or kept the money is independent of whether they were given four quarters or a $1 bill.

It seems that there is a denomination effect.

08

Effect of Yates’s correction

The effect of Yates’s correction factor is that the tests statisticdecreases as compared to the test statistic computed without using any correction factor.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In his book Outliers,author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more

American-born baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July 31 because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. The table below lists months of births for a sample of American-born baseball players and foreign-born baseball players. Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that months of births of baseball players are independent of whether they are born in America? Do the data appear to support Gladwell’s claim?


Born in America

Foreign Born

Jan.

387

101

Feb.

329

82

March

366

85

April

344

82

May

336

94

June

313

83

July

313

59

Aug.

503

91

Sept.

421

70

Oct.

434

100

Nov.

398

103

Dec.

371

82

Questions 6–10 refer to the sample data in the following table, which describes the fate of the passengers and crew aboard the Titanic when it sank on April 15, 1912. Assume that the data are a sample from a large population and we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that surviving is independent of whether the person is a man, woman, boy, or girl.


Men

Women

Boys

Girls

Survived

332

318

29

27

Died

1360

104

35

18

Identify the null and alternative hypotheses corresponding to the stated claim.

In Exercises 1–4, use the following listed arrival delay times (minutes) for American Airline flights from New York to Los Angeles. Negative values correspond to flights that arrived early. Also shown are the SPSS results for analysis of variance. Assume that we plan to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the different flights have the same mean arrival delay time.

Flight 1

-32

-25

-26

-6

5

-15

-17

-36

Flight 19

-5

-32

-13

-9

-19

49

-30

-23

Flight 21

-23

28

103

-19

-5

-46

13

-3

Test Statistic What is the value of the test statistic? What distribution is used with the test statistic?

Benford’s Law. According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Detecting Fraud When working for the Brooklyn district attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 15, 0, 76, 479, 183, 8, 23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford’s law, the check amounts appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.01 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford’s law. Does it appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

A study of people who refused to answer survey questions provided the randomly selected sample data shown in the table below (based on data from “I Hear You Knocking But You Can’t Come In,” by Fitzgerald and Fuller, Sociological Methods and Research,Vol. 11, No. 1). At the 0.01 significance level, test the claim that the cooperation of

the subject (response or refusal) is independent of the age category. Does any particular age group appear to be particularly uncooperative?

Age


18-21

22-29

30-39

40-49

50-59

60 and over

Responded

73

255

245

136

138

202

Refused

11

20

33

16

27

49

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free