Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Cybersecurity The table below lists leading digits of 317 inter-arrival Internet traffic times for a computer, along with the frequencies of leading digits expected with Benford’s law (from Table 11-1 in the Chapter Problem).

a. Identify the notation used for observed and expected values.

b. Identify the observed and expected values for the leading digit of 2.

c. Use the results from part (b) to find the contribution to the\({\chi ^2}\)test statistic from the category representing the leading digit of 2.

Leading Digit

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Benford’s

Law

30.1%

17.6%

12.5%

9.7%

7.9%

6.7%

5.8%

5.1%

4.6%

Leading Digits

of Inter-Arrival

Traffic Times

76

62

29

33

19

27

28

21

22

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.The notation used for the observed frequencies is O and the notation used for the expected frequencies is E.

b.The observed frequency for the leading digit of 2 is equal to 62 and the expected frequency of the leading digit of 2 is equal to 55.792.

c. The value of\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)is equal to 0.691.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The observed frequencies and the expected frequencies of the leading digits of inter-arrival traffic times are tabulated.

02

Notation for observed and expected frequency

a.

The observed frequencies are represented by O.

The expected frequencies are represented by E.

03

Identify the observed and expected frequency for the leading digit 2

b.

The observed frequency (O) corresponding to the leading digit of 2 is equal to 62.

The formula to compute the expected frequency is as follows:

\(E = np\)where

n is the sum of all observed frequencies

p is the probability of occurrence of that outcome.

Here, the sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 76 + 62 + ..... + 22\\ = 317\end{aligned}\)

The value of p for the leading digit of 2 is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p = 17.6\% \\ = \frac{{17.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.176\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the expected frequency of the leading digit of 2 is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = np\\ = 317\left( {0.176} \right)\\ = 55.792\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the expected frequency of the leading digit of 2 is equal to 55.792.

04

Contribution to the test statistic

c.

The contribution to thechi-squaretest statistic from the category representing the leading digit of 2 is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E} = \frac{{{{\left( {62 - 55.792} \right)}^2}}}{{55.792}}\\ = 0.6907\\ \approx 0.691\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the contribution to the chi-squaretest statistic from the category representing the leading digit of 2 is equal to 0.691.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 1–5 refer to the sample data in the following table, which summarizes the last digits of the heights (cm) of 300 randomly selected subjects (from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B). Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the data are from a population having the property that the last digits are all equally likely.

Last Digit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Frequency

30

35

24

25

35

36

37

27

27

24

Is the hypothesis test left-tailed, right-tailed, or two-tailed?

American Idol Contestants on the TV show American Idol competed to win a singing contest. At one point, the website WhatNotToSing.com listed the actual numbers of eliminations for different orders of singing, and the expected number of eliminations was also listed. The results are in the table below. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual eliminations agree with the expected numbers. Does there appear to be support for the claim that the leadoff singers appear to be at a disadvantage?

Singing Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7–12

Actual Eliminations

20

12

9

8

6

5

9

Expected Eliminations

12.9

12.9

9.9

7.9

6.4

5.5

13.5

In Exercises 5–20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Kentucky Derby The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions through the 141st running of the Kentucky Derby horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside rail, so the horse in that position has the shortest distance to run. (Because the number of horses varies from year to year, only the first 10 post positions are included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse racing in the Kentucky Derby?

Post Position

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Wins

19

14

11

15

15

7

8

12

5

11

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age,

researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table (based on data from “Texting While Driving and Other Risky Motor Vehicle Behaviors Among U.S. High School Students,” by O’Malley, Shults, and Eaton, Pediatrics,Vol. 131, No. 6). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and irregular seat belt use. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other?


Irregular Seat Belt Use?


Yes

No

Texted while driving

1737

2048

No Texting while driving

1945

2775

Winning team data were collected for teams in different sports, with the results given in the table on the top of the next page (based on data from “Predicting Professional Sports Game Outcomes fromIntermediateGame Scores,” by Copper, DeNeve, and Mosteller, Chance,Vol. 5, No. 3–4). Use a 0.10significance level to test the claim that home/visitor wins are independent of the sport. Given that among the four sports included here, baseball is the only sport in which the home team canmodify field dimensions to favor its own players, does it appear that baseball teams are effective in using this advantage?

Basketball

Baseball

Hockey

Football

Home Team Wins

127

53

50

57

Visiting Team Wins

71

47

43

42

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free