Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and , or critical value, and state the conclusion.

World Series Games The table below lists the numbers of games played in 105 Major League Baseball (MLB) World Series. This table also includes the expected proportions for the numbers of games in a World Series, assuming that in each series, both teams have about the same chance of winning. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual numbers of games fit the distribution indicated by the expected proportions.

Games Played

4

5

6

7

World Series Contests

21

23

23

38

Expected Proportion

2/16

4/16

5/16

5/16

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude that the number of games does not fit the expected distribution of proportions.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of games played in 105 Major League Baseball (MLB) World Series is provided. The expected proportions for the number of games in a World Series are also given.

02

Check the requirements

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the games.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_4} = 21\\{O_5} = 23\\{O_6} = 23\\{O_7} = 38\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 21 + 23 + 23 + 38\\ = 105\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.

Let pi be the expected proportions for the ith game.

The values of pi are tabulated below:

Number of Games

(i)

Expected Proportions

\(\left( {{p_i}} \right)\)

4

\(\frac{2}{{16}}\)

5

\(\frac{4}{{16}}\)

6

\(\frac{5}{{16}}\)

7

\(\frac{5}{{16}}\)

The expected frequencies for each number of games are equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_1} = n{p_1}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{2}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 13.125\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_2} = n{p_2}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{5}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 26.25\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_3} = n{p_3}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{5}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 32.8125\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_4} = n{p_4}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{5}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 32.8125\end{aligned}\)

As all the expected values are larger than 5, the requirements for the test are fulfilled if it is assumed that sampling is conducted in a random manner.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

\({H_0}:\)The number of games fits the expected distribution of proportions.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

\({H_a}:\)The number of games does not fit the expected distribution of proportions.

The test is right-tailed.

04

Conduct the hypothesis test

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Games Played

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

4

21

13.125

7.875

62.01563

4.725

5

23

26.25

-3.25

10.5625

0.402381

6

23

32.8125

-9.8125

96.28516

2.934405

7

38

32.8125

5.1875

26.91016

0.820119

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \;\\ = 4.725 + 0.402381 + 2.934405 + 0.820119\\ = 8.881905\end{aligned}\]

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 8.882\).

Let k be the games played which are 4.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 4 - 1\\ = 3\end{aligned}\)

05

State the decision

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 9 degrees of freedom is equal to 7.815.

The p-value is,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 8.882} \right)\\ = 0.031\end{aligned}\).

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

06

State the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude that the actual number of games does not fit the distribution of expected proportions at the given level of significance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Benford’s Law. According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Tax Cheating? Frequencies of leading digits from IRS tax files are 152, 89, 63, 48, 39, 40, 28, 25, and 27 (corresponding to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively, based on data from Mark Nigrini, who provides software for Benford data analysis). Using a 0.05 significance level, test for goodness-of-fit with Benford’s law. Does it appear that the tax entries are legitimate?

A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of splinting versus surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Results are given in the table below (based on data from “Splinting vs. Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome,” by Gerritsen et al., Journal of the American Medical Association,Vol. 288,

No. 10). The results are based on evaluations made one year after the treatment. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that success is independent of the type of treatment. What do the results suggest about treating carpal tunnel syndrome?

Successful Treatment

Unsuccessful Treatment

Splint Treatment

60

23

Surgery Treatment

67

6

The table below includes results from polygraph (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers Charles R. Honts (Boise State University) and Gordon H. Barland (Department of Defense Polygraph Institute). In each case, it was known if the subject lied or did not lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truths and lies?

Did the subject Actually Lie?


No (Did Not Lie)

Yes (Lied)

Polygraph test indicates that the subject lied.


15

42

Polygraph test indicates that the subject did not lied.


32

9

Questions 6–10 refer to the sample data in the following table, which describes the fate of the passengers and crew aboard the Titanic when it sank on April 15, 1912. Assume that the data are a sample from a large population and we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that surviving is independent of whether the person is a man, woman, boy, or girl.


Men

Women

Boys

Girls

Survived

332

318

29

27

Died

1360

104

35

18

Given that the P-value for the hypothesis test is 0.000 when rounded to three decimal places, what do you conclude? What do the results indicate about the rule that women and children should be the first to be saved?

Police Calls The police department in Madison, Connecticut, released the following numbers of calls for the different days of the week during February that had 28 days: Monday (114); Tuesday (152); Wednesday (160); Thursday (164); Friday (179); Saturday (196); Sunday (130). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the different days of the week have the same frequencies of police calls. Is there anything notable about the observed frequencies?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free