Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and , or critical value, and state the conclusion.

World Series Games The table below lists the numbers of games played in 105 Major League Baseball (MLB) World Series. This table also includes the expected proportions for the numbers of games in a World Series, assuming that in each series, both teams have about the same chance of winning. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual numbers of games fit the distribution indicated by the expected proportions.

Games Played

4

5

6

7

World Series Contests

21

23

23

38

Expected Proportion

2/16

4/16

5/16

5/16

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude that the number of games does not fit the expected distribution of proportions.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of games played in 105 Major League Baseball (MLB) World Series is provided. The expected proportions for the number of games in a World Series are also given.

02

Check the requirements

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the games.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_4} = 21\\{O_5} = 23\\{O_6} = 23\\{O_7} = 38\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 21 + 23 + 23 + 38\\ = 105\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.

Let pi be the expected proportions for the ith game.

The values of pi are tabulated below:

Number of Games

(i)

Expected Proportions

\(\left( {{p_i}} \right)\)

4

\(\frac{2}{{16}}\)

5

\(\frac{4}{{16}}\)

6

\(\frac{5}{{16}}\)

7

\(\frac{5}{{16}}\)

The expected frequencies for each number of games are equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_1} = n{p_1}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{2}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 13.125\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_2} = n{p_2}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{5}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 26.25\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_3} = n{p_3}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{5}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 32.8125\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_4} = n{p_4}\\ = 105\left( {\frac{5}{{16}}} \right)\\ = 32.8125\end{aligned}\)

As all the expected values are larger than 5, the requirements for the test are fulfilled if it is assumed that sampling is conducted in a random manner.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

\({H_0}:\)The number of games fits the expected distribution of proportions.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

\({H_a}:\)The number of games does not fit the expected distribution of proportions.

The test is right-tailed.

04

Conduct the hypothesis test

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Games Played

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

4

21

13.125

7.875

62.01563

4.725

5

23

26.25

-3.25

10.5625

0.402381

6

23

32.8125

-9.8125

96.28516

2.934405

7

38

32.8125

5.1875

26.91016

0.820119

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \;\\ = 4.725 + 0.402381 + 2.934405 + 0.820119\\ = 8.881905\end{aligned}\]

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 8.882\).

Let k be the games played which are 4.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 4 - 1\\ = 3\end{aligned}\)

05

State the decision

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 9 degrees of freedom is equal to 7.815.

The p-value is,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 8.882} \right)\\ = 0.031\end{aligned}\).

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

06

State the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude that the actual number of games does not fit the distribution of expected proportions at the given level of significance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Probability Refer to the results from the 150 subjects in Cumulative Review Exercise 5.

a.Find the probability that if 1 of the 150 subjects is randomly selected, the result is a woman who spent the money.

b.Find the probability that if 1 of the 150 subjects is randomly selected, the result is a woman who spent the money or was given a single 100-yuan bill.

c.If two different women are randomly selected, find the probability that they both spent the money.

Bias in Clinical Trials? Researchers investigated the issue of race and equality of access to clinical trials. The following table shows the population distribution and the numbers of participants in clinical trials involving lung cancer (based on data from “Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials,” by Murthy, Krumholz, and Gross, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 22). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the distribution of clinical trial participants fits well with the population distribution. Is there a race/ethnic group that appears to be very underrepresented?

Race/ethnicity

White

non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Black

Asian/

Pacific

Islander

American Indian/

Alaskan Native

Distribution of

Population

75.6%

9.1%

10.8%

3.8%

0.7%

Number in Lung

Cancer Clinical Trials

3855

60

316

54

12

In soccer, serious fouls in the penalty box result in a penalty kick withone kicker and one defending goalkeeper. The table below summarizes results from 286 kicksduring games among top teams (based on data from “Action Bias Among Elite Soccer Goalkeepers:

The Case of Penalty Kicks,” by Bar-Eli et al., Journal of Economic Psychology,Vol.28, No. 5). In the table, jump direction indicates which way the goalkeeper jumped, where thekick direction is from the perspective of the goalkeeper. Use a 0.05 significance level to test theclaim that the direction of the kick is independent of the direction of the goalkeeper jump. Dothe results support the theory that because the kicks are so fast, goalkeepers have no time toreact, so the directions of their jumps are independent of the directions of the kicks?

Goalkeeper Jump

Left

Center

Right

Kick to Left

54

1

37

Kick to Center

41

10

31

Kick to Right

46

7

59

Cybersecurity When using the data from Exercise 1 to test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law, identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Winning team data were collected for teams in different sports, with the results given in the table on the top of the next page (based on data from “Predicting Professional Sports Game Outcomes fromIntermediateGame Scores,” by Copper, DeNeve, and Mosteller, Chance,Vol. 5, No. 3–4). Use a 0.10significance level to test the claim that home/visitor wins are independent of the sport. Given that among the four sports included here, baseball is the only sport in which the home team canmodify field dimensions to favor its own players, does it appear that baseball teams are effective in using this advantage?

Basketball

Baseball

Hockey

Football

Home Team Wins

127

53

50

57

Visiting Team Wins

71

47

43

42

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free