Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5–8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Weight , Waist r = 0.885 (x = weight of male, y = waist size of male)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The coefficient of determination is 0.783.

It means 78.3% of the variation is explained by the linear association between the weight and the waist size of a male.

And 21.7% of the variation in the response variable (waist size of male)is explained by other factors and random variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The linear correlation coefficient between the weight and the waist size of a male is 0.885.

02

Coefficient of determination

The square of the linear correlation coefficient between the two variables is the coefficient of determination.

Here, the linear correlation coefficient (r) between the weight and the waist size of a male is 0.885.

Thus,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Coefficient}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{determination}} = {r^2}\\ = {0.885^2}\\ = 0.783\end{array}\)

Therefore, the value of the coefficient of determination is 0.783.

03

Percentage of variation

Here,

\(\begin{array}{c}{r^2} = 0.783\\ = \frac{{78.3}}{{100}} \times 100\% \\ = 78.3\% \end{array}\)

Therefore, the percentage of the variation explained by the linear association between the weight and the waist size of males is 98.4%.

The rest \(100\% - 78.3\% = 21.7\% \) variation is explained by other factors and random variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. Use the given data to find the regression equation and the best predicted value of the response variable. Be sure to follow the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Head widths (in.) and weights (lb) were measured for 20 randomly selected bears (from Data Set 9 “Bear Measurements” in Appendix B). The 20 pairs of measurements yield\(\bar x = 6.9\)in.,\(\bar y = 214.3\)lb, r= 0.879, P-value = 0.000, and\(\hat y = - 212 + 61.9x\). Find the best predicted value of\(\hat y\)(weight) given a bear with a head width of 6.5 in.

In exercise 10-1 12. Clusters Refer to the following Minitab-generated scatterplot. The four points in the lower left corner are measurements from women, and the four points in the upper right corner are from men.

a. Examine the pattern of the four points in the lower left corner (from women) only, and subjectively determine whether there appears to be a correlation between x and y for women.

b. Examine the pattern of the four points in the upper right corner (from men) only, and subjectively determine whether there appears to be a correlation between x and y for men.

c. Find the linear correlation coefficient using only the four points in the lower left corner (for women). Will the four points in the upper left corner (for men) have the same linear correlation coefficient?

d. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient using all eight points. What does that value suggest about the relationship between x and y?

e. Based on the preceding results, what do you conclude? Should the data from women and the data from men be considered together, or do they appear to represent two different and distinct populations that should be analyzed separately?

In Exercises 5–8, we want to consider the correlation between heights of fathers and mothers and the heights of their sons. Refer to the

StatCrunch display and answer the given questions or identify the indicated items.

The display is based on Data Set 5 “Family Heights” in Appendix B.

A son will be born to a father who is 70 in. tall and a mother who is 60 in. tall. Use the multiple regression equation to predict the height of the son. Is the result likely to be a good predicted value? Why or why not?

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the pizza costs and subway fares to find the best predicted

subway fare, given that the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00. Is the best predicted subway fare likely to be implemented?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times)

Which of the following change if the two variables of enrollment and burglaries are switched: the value of r= 0.499, the P-value of 0.393, the critical values of\( \pm \)0.878?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free