Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to theaccompanying displays.Garbage Data Set 31 “Garbage Weight” in Appendix B includes weights of garbage discarded in one week from 62 different households. The paired weights of paper and glass were used to obtain the XLSTAT results shown here. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between weights of discarded paper and glass?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of paper and glass discarded by households.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The paired data for the weights of paper and glass are recorded with the output of the correlation matrix. The correlation value between the two variables is 0.1174.

And the number of households (n) taken is62.

02

Step 2:Conduct a hypothesis test for correlation

Let\(\rho \)be the true correlation coefficient measure between the weights of paper and glass.

To test the claim about the linear association, form the hypotheses as shown:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{o}}}:\rho = 0\\{{\rm{{\rm H}}}_{\rm{a}}}:\rho \ne 0\end{array}\)

The samples number of households is62(n).

The test statistic is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} t &= \frac{r}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {r^2}}}{{n - 2}}} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.1174}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {{0.1174}^2}}}{{62 - 2}}} }}\\ &= 0.9157\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is 0.9157.

The degree of freedom is computedbelow:

\(\begin{aligned} df &= n - 2\\ &= 62 - 2\\ &= 60\end{aligned}\)

The p-value is computed using thet-distribution table:

\(\begin{aligned} p{\rm{ - value}} &= 2P\left( {T > t} \right)\\ &= 2P\left( {T > 0.9157} \right)\\ &= 2\left( {1 - P\left( {T < 0.9157} \right)} \right)\\ &= 0.3635\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the p-value is 0.3635.

03

State the conclusion

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Thus, it can be concluded at the 0.05 level of significance,there is not enough evidence to support the existence ofa linear correlation between the weights of paper and glass, which were discarded.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Enrollment (thousands)

53

28

27

36

42

Burglaries

86

57

32

131

157

True or false: If the sample data lead us to the conclusion that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between enrollment and number of burglaries, then we could also conclude that higher enrollments cause increases in numbers of burglaries.

Stocks and Sunspots. Listed below are annual high values of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and annual mean sunspot numbers for eight recent years. Use the data for Exercises 1–5. A sunspot number is a measure of sunspots or groups of sunspots on the surface of the sun. The DJIA is a commonly used index that is a weighted mean calculated from different stock values.

DJIA

14,198

13,338

10,606

11,625

12,929

13,589

16,577

18,054

Sunspot

Number

7.5

2.9

3.1

16.5

55.7

57.6

64.7

79.3

Correlation Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a linear correlation between the DJIA values and the sunspot numbers. Is the result as you expected? Should anyone consider investing in stocks based on sunspot numbers?

In Exercises 5–8, we want to consider the correlation between heights of fathers and mothers and the heights of their sons. Refer to the

StatCrunch display and answer the given questions or identify the indicated items.

The display is based on Data Set 5 “Family Heights” in Appendix B.

Identify the following:

a. The P-value corresponding to the overall significance of the multiple regression equation

b. The value of the multiple coefficient of determination\({R^2}\).

c. The adjusted value of \({R^2}\)

Global Warming If we find that there is a linear correlation between the concentration of carbon dioxide (\(C{O_2}\)) in our atmosphere and the global mean temperature, does that indicate that changes in (\(C{O_2}\))cause changes in the global mean temperature? Why or why not?

Prediction Interval Using the heights and weights described in Exercise 1, a height of 180 cm is used to find that the predicted weight is 91.3 kg, and the 95% prediction interval is (59.0 kg, 123.6 kg). Write a statement that interprets that prediction interval. What is the major advantage of using a prediction interval instead of simply using the predicted weight of 91.3 kg? Why is the terminology of prediction interval used instead of confidence interval?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free