Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Cell Phones and Driving In the author’s home town of Madison, CT, there were 2733 police traffic stops in a recent year, and 7% of them were attributable to improper use of cell phones. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population in which fewer than 10% of police traffic stops are attributable to improper cell phone use.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than 10% of police traffic stops are attributable to improper cell phone use.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 2733 police traffic stops, 7% were due to improper use of cell phones.

02

z-test

The z-test is used to test whether the sample proportion is equal to the given value of proportion.

03

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is as follows:

The sample proportion of traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is equal to 10%.

\({H_0}:P = 0.10\)


The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The sample proportion of traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is equal to 10%.

\({H_0}:P < 0.10\)

The test is left-tailed.

If the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

04

Important computations

Sample proportion (p) of the traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is given to be equal to 7% or 0.07.

Population proportion (P) of the traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is given to be equal to 10% or 0.10.

Thus, the population proportion (Q) of the traffic stops that were due to reasons other than improper use of cell phones is given as:

\(\begin{aligned} Q &= 1 - P\\ &= 1 - 0.10\\ &= 0.90\end{aligned}\)

The sample size (n) is equal to 2733.

05

Test statistic

The test statistic value is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} z &= \frac{{p - P}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{PQ}}{n}} }}\;\; \sim N\left( {0,1} \right)\\ &= \frac{{0.07 - 0.10}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.10} \right)\left( {0.90} \right)}}{{2733}}} }}\\ &= - 5.2278\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is – 5.2278.

06

Critical value and p-value

The critical value of z corresponding\(\alpha = 0.05\)for a left-tailed test is equal to -1.6449.

By using the standard normal table, the p-value is 0.000.

Since the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

07

Conclusion

There is enough evidence to support the claim thatfewer than 10% of police traffic stops are attributable to improper cell phone use.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Best Multiple Regression Equation For the regression equation given in Exercise 1, the P-value is 0.000 and the adjusted \({R^2}\)value is 0.925. If we were to include an additional predictor variable of neck size (in.), the P-value becomes 0.000 and the adjusted\({R^2}\)becomes 0.933. Given that the adjusted \({R^2}\)value of 0.933 is larger than 0.925, is it better to use the regression equation with the three predictor variables of length, chest size, and neck size? Explain.

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5–8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Bears r = 0.783 (x = head width of a bear, y = weight of a bear)

Stocks and Sunspots. Listed below are annual high values of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and annual mean sunspot numbers for eight recent years. Use the data for Exercises 1–5. A sunspot number is a measure of sunspots or groups of sunspots on the surface of the sun. The DJIA is a commonly used index that is a weighted mean calculated from different stock values.

DJIA

14,198

13,338

10,606

11,625

12,929

13,589

16,577

18,054

Sunspot

Number

7.5

2.9

3.1

16.5

55.7

57.6

64.7

79.3

Hypothesis Test The mean sunspot number for the past three centuries is 49.7. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the eight listed sunspot numbers are from a population with a mean equal to 49.7.

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5–8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Crickets and Temperature r = 0.874 (x = number of cricket chirps in 1 minute, y = temperature in °F)

In Exercises 9 and 10, use the given data to find the equation of the regression line. Examine the scatterplot and identify a characteristic of the data that is ignored by the regression line.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free