Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5–8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Pizza and Subways r = 0.992 (x = cost of a slice of pizza, y = subway fare in New York City

Short Answer

Expert verified

The coefficient of determination is 0.984.

The percentage of variation that can be explained by the linear association between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 98.4%.

1.6% of the variation in the response variable (subway fare in New York city) is explained by other factors and random variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The linear correlation coefficient between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 0.992.

02

Coefficient of determination

The coefficient of determination is the square of the linear correlation coefficient between the two variables.

Here, the linear correlation coefficient (r) between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 0.992.

Thus,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Coefficient}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{determination}} = {r^2}\\ = {0.992^2}\\ = 0.984\end{array}\)

Therefore, the value of the coefficient of determination is 0.984.

03

Percentage of variation

Here,

\(\begin{array}{c}{r^2} = 0.984\\ = \frac{{98.4}}{{100}} \times 100\% \\ = 98.4\% \end{array}\)

Therefore, the percentage of the variation explained by the linear association between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 98.4%.

The remaining \(100\% - 98.4\% = 1.6\% \) variation is explained by other factors and random variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5–8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Weight , Waist r = 0.885 (x = weight of male, y = waist size of male)

Interpreting\({R^2}\)For the multiple regression equation given in Exercise 1, we get \({R^2}\)= 0.928. What does that value tell us?

Stocks and Sunspots. Listed below are annual high values of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and annual mean sunspot numbers for eight recent years. Use the data for Exercises 1–5. A sunspot number is a measure of sunspots or groups of sunspots on the surface of the sun. The DJIA is a commonly used index that is a weighted mean calculated from different stock values.

DJIA

14,198

13,338

10,606

11,625

12,929

13,589

16,577

18,054

Sunspot

Number

7.5

2.9

3.1

16.5

55.7

57.6

64.7

79.3

Correlation Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a linear correlation between the DJIA values and the sunspot numbers. Is the result as you expected? Should anyone consider investing in stocks based on sunspot numbers?

Interpreting a Graph The accompanying graph plots the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing. The graph of the quadratic equation that best fits the data is also shown in red. What feature of the graph justifies the value of\({R^2}\)= 0.255 for the quadratic model?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

If you had computed the value of the linear correlation coefficient to be 1.500, what should you conclude?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free