Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the

accompanying displays.

Casino Size and Revenue The New York Times published the sizes (square feet) and revenues (dollars) of seven different casinos in Atlantic City. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue? Do the results suggest that a casino can increase its revenue by expanding its size?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not sufficient evidence in support of the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue.

No, the result is not suggestive that revenue increases by expansion in size.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The variables under study are the sizes(square feet) and revenues (dollars) ofseven casinos. The correlation between the two variables is 0.44456896.

02

Step 2:Conduct a hypothesis test for the correlation

Let\(\rho \)be the true correlation coefficient measure for the two variables.

To test the claim that there is a linear correlation between two variables, form the hypotheses as shown below:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{o}}}:\rho = 0\\{{\rm{{\rm H}}}_{\rm{a}}}:\rho \ne 0\end{array}\)

The samples number of casinos is7(n).

The test statistic is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}t &= \frac{r}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {r^2}}}{{n - 2}}} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.44456896}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {{0.44456896}^2}}}{{7 - 2}}} }}\\ &= 1.110\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is 1.110.

The degree of freedom is computedbelow:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= n - 2\\ &= 7 - 2\\ &= 5\end{aligned}\)

The p-value is computed using the t-distribution table:

\(\begin{aligned} p{\rm{ - value}} &= 2P\left( {T < t} \right)\\ &= 2P\left( {T < 1.110} \right)\\ &= 0.3175\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the p-value is 0.3175.

03

State the conclusion

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Thus, it can be concluded at the 0.05 level of significance,there is not enough evidence to support theexistence of a linear correlation between size and revenue.

04

Explain the relationship between revenue and size

As there is no correlation between the variables, theyare not linearly associated.

Moreover, correlation does not implythat one variable causes the other to occur.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Finding a Prediction Interval. In Exercises 13–16, use the paired data consisting of registered Florida boats (tens of thousands) and manatee fatalities from boat encounters listed in Data Set 10 “Manatee Deaths” in Appendix B. Let x represent number of registered boats and let y represent the corresponding number of manatee deaths. Use the given number of registered boats and the given confidence level to construct a prediction interval estimate of manatee deaths.

Boats Use x = 85 (for 850,000 registered boats) with a 99% confidence level.

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Exercise 1 stated that ris found to be 0.499. Does that value change if the actual enrollment values of 53,000, 28,000, 27,000, 36,000, and 42,000 are used instead of 53, 28, 27, 36, and 42?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Repeat the preceding exercise, assuming that the linear correlation coefficient is r= 0.997.

Best Multiple Regression Equation For the regression equation given in Exercise 1, the P-value is 0.000 and the adjusted \({R^2}\)value is 0.925. If we were to include an additional predictor variable of neck size (in.), the P-value becomes 0.000 and the adjusted\({R^2}\)becomes 0.933. Given that the adjusted \({R^2}\)value of 0.933 is larger than 0.925, is it better to use the regression equation with the three predictor variables of length, chest size, and neck size? Explain.

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Sports Repeat the preceding exercise using diameters and volumes.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free