Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Time and Motion In a physics experiment at Doane College, a soccer ball was thrown upward from the bed of a moving truck. The table below lists the time (sec) that has lapsed from the throw and the height (m) of the soccer ball. What do you conclude about the relationship between time and height? What horrible mistake would be easy to make if the analysis is conducted without a scatterplot?

Time (sec)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Height (m)

0.0

1.7

3.1

3.9

4.5

4.7

4.6

4.1

3.3

2.1

Short Answer

Expert verified

The value of r is equal to 0.450.

Since the p-value of 0.192 is greater than 0.05, there is not a significant linear correlation between the time (sec) and height (m).

The scatter plot is represented as,

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The table represents the time (sec) that has lapsed from the throw and the height (m) of the soccer ball.

02

Calculate the correlation coefficient

Let x represents the Time (sec).

Let y represent the Height (m).

The formula for computing the correlation coefficient (r) between the values of Time (sec) and Height (m) is as follows:

\(r = \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\)

The following calculations are done to compute the value of r:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

\({y^2}\)

0

0

0

0

0

0.2

1.7

0.34

0.04

2.89

0.4

3.1

1.24

0.16

9.61

0.6

3.9

2.34

0.36

15.21

0.8

4.5

3.6

0.64

20.25

1

4.7

4.7

1

22.09

1.2

4.6

5.52

1.44

21.16

1.4

4.1

5.74

1.96

16.81

1.6

3.3

5.28

2.56

10.89

1.8

2.1

3.78

3.24

4.41

\(\sum x \)=9

\(\sum y \)=32

\(\sum {xy} \)=32.54

\(\sum {{x^2}} \)=11.4

\(\sum {{y^2}} \)=123.32

Substituting the above values, the value of r is obtained as,

\(\begin{aligned} r &= \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= \frac{{10\left( {32.54} \right) - \left( 9 \right)\left( {32} \right)}}{{\sqrt {10\left( {11.4} \right) - {{\left( 9 \right)}^2}} \sqrt {10\left( {123.32} \right) - {{\left( {32} \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= 0.450\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of r is equal to 0.450.

03

Significance of r

Here, n=10.

If the value of the correlation coefficient lies between the critical values, then the correlation between the two variables is considered significant else, it is considered insignificant.

The critical values of r for n=10 and \(\alpha = 0.05\) are -0.632 and 0.632.

The corresponding p-value of r is equal to 0.192.

Since the computed value of r equal to 0.450 is greater than the larger critical value of 0.192, it can be said that the correlation between the two variables is insignificant.

Moreover, the p-value is greater than 0.05. This also implies that correlation is insignificant.

Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence to claim that there is a linear correlation between the time (sec) and the height (m).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Best Multiple Regression Equation For the regression equation given in Exercise 1, the P-value is 0.000 and the adjusted \({R^2}\)value is 0.925. If we were to include an additional predictor variable of neck size (in.), the P-value becomes 0.000 and the adjusted\({R^2}\)becomes 0.933. Given that the adjusted \({R^2}\)value of 0.933 is larger than 0.925, is it better to use the regression equation with the three predictor variables of length, chest size, and neck size? Explain.

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13โ€“28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Lemons and Car Crashes Listed below are annual data for various years. The data are weights (metric tons) of lemons imported from Mexico and U.S. car crash fatality rates per 100,000 population (based on data from โ€œThe Trouble with QSAR (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace Fallacy),โ€ by Stephen Johnson, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 48, No. 1). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between weights of lemon imports from Mexico and U.S. car fatality rates? Do the results suggest that imported lemons cause car fatalities?

Lemon Imports

230

265

358

480

530

Crash Fatality Rate

15.9

15.7

15.4

15.3

14.9

\({s_e}\)Notation Using Data Set 1 โ€œBody Dataโ€ in Appendix B, if we let the predictor variable x represent heights of males and let the response variable y represent weights of males, the sample of 153 heights and weights results in\({s_e}\)= 16.27555 cm. In your own words, describe what that value of \({s_e}\)represents.

Exercises 13โ€“28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13โ€“28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the CPI/subway fare data from the preceding exercise and find

the best predicted subway fare for a time when the CPI reaches 500. What is wrong with this prediction?

Stocks and Sunspots. Listed below are annual high values of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and annual mean sunspot numbers for eight recent years. Use the data for Exercises 1โ€“5. A sunspot number is a measure of sunspots or groups of sunspots on the surface of the sun. The DJIA is a commonly used index that is a weighted mean calculated from different stock values.

DJIA

14,198

13,338

10,606

11,625

12,929

13,589

16,577

18,054

Sunspot

Number

7.5

2.9

3.1

16.5

55.7

57.6

64.7

79.3

Correlation Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a linear correlation between the DJIA values and the sunspot numbers. Is the result as you expected? Should anyone consider investing in stocks based on sunspot numbers?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free