Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Confidence Interval for Mean Predicted Value Example 1 in this section illustrated the procedure for finding a prediction interval for an individual value of y. When using a specific value\({x_0}\)for predicting the mean of all values of y, the confidence interval is as follows:

\(\hat y - E < \bar y < \hat y + E\)

where

\(E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}{s_e}\sqrt {\frac{1}{n} + \frac{{n{{\left( {{x_0} - \bar x} \right)}^2}}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}} \)

The critical value\({t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)is found with n - 2 degrees of freedom. Using the 23 pairs of chocolate/Nobel data from Table 10-1 on page 469 in the Chapter Problem, find a 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean Nobel rate given that the chocolate consumption is 10 kg per capita.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The 95% confidence interval for the mean number of Nobel Laureates for the given value of chocolate consumption equal to 10 kgs is (17.1,26.0).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data are given for two variables “Chocolate Consumption” and “Number of Nobel Laureates”.

Let x denote the variable “Chocolate Consumption”.

Let y denote the variable “Number of Nobel Laureates”.

Referring to Example 1 of section 10-3, the provided information is:

Sample size, n = 23

\({s_e} = {\bf{6}}{\bf{.262665}}\)

\(\hat y = - 3.37 + 2.49x\)

02

Formula of the confidence interval for predicting the mean of all values of y when specific value \({{\bf{x}}_{\bf{0}}}\) is known

The confidence interval for predicting the mean of all values of y by using the specific value\({x_0}\)is as follows:

\(CI = \left( {\hat y - E,\hat y + E} \right)\)

where\(E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}{s_e}\sqrt {\frac{1}{n} + \frac{{n{{\left( {{x_0} - \bar x} \right)}^2}}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}} \)

The critical value \({t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\) (also known as t multiplies) is found with n - 2 degrees of freedom and the significance level.

03

Predicted value at \(\left( {{x_0}} \right)\)

Substituting the value of\({x_0} = 10\)in the regression equation, the predicted value is obtained as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\hat y &= - 3.37 + 2.49x\\ &= - 3.37 + 2.49\left( {10} \right)\\ &= 21.53\end{aligned}\)

04

Level of significance and degrees of freedom

The following formula is used to compute the level of significance

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\;{\rm{Level}} &= 95\% \\100\left( {1 - \alpha } \right) &= 95\\1 - \alpha &= 0.95\\ &= 0.05\end{aligned}\)

The degrees of freedom for computing the value of the t-multiplier are shown below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= n - 2\\ &= 23 - 2\\ &= 21\end{aligned}\)

The two-tailed value of the t-multiplier for level of significance equal to 0.05 and degrees of freedom equal to 21 is equal to 2.0796.

05

Value of \(\bar x,\)\(\sum {{{\bf{x}}^{\bf{2}}}} \)and \(\sum {\bf{x}} \)

The following calculations are done to compute the \(\sum {{x^2}} \)and \(\sum x \):

The value of\(\bar x\)is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\bar x &= \frac{{\sum x }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{134.5}}{{23}}\\ &= 5.847826\end{aligned}\)

06

Confidence interval

Substitute the values obtained from above to calculate the value of margin of error (E) as shown:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E &= {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}{s_e}\sqrt {\frac{1}{n} + \frac{{n{{\left( {{x_0} - \bar x} \right)}^2}}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}} \\ &= \left( {2.0796} \right)\left( {6.262665} \right)\sqrt {\frac{1}{{23}} + \frac{{23{{\left( {10 - 5.847826} \right)}^2}}}{{23\left( {1023.05} \right) - {{\left( {134.5} \right)}^2}}}} \\ &= 4.44286\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the confidence interval becomes:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}CI &= \left( {\hat y - E,\hat y + E} \right)\\ &= \left( {21.53 - 4.44286,21.53 + 4.44286} \right)\\ &= \left( {17.0871,25.9729} \right)\\ &= \left( {17.1,26.0} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, 95% confidence interval for the mean number of Nobel Laureates for the given value of chocolate consumption equal to 10 kgs is (17.1, 26.0).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Super Bowl and\({R^2}\)Let x represent years coded as 1, 2, 3, . . . for years starting in 1980, and let y represent the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl from 1980. Using the data from 1980 to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing, we obtain the following values of\({R^2}\)for the different models: linear: 0.147; quadratic: 0.255; logarithmic: 0.176; exponential: 0.175; power: 0.203. Based on these results, which model is best? Is the best model a good model? What do the results suggest about predicting the number of points scored in a future Super Bowl game?

Stocks and Sunspots. Listed below are annual high values of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and annual mean sunspot numbers for eight recent years. Use the data for Exercises 1–5. A sunspot number is a measure of sunspots or groups of sunspots on the surface of the sun. The DJIA is a commonly used index that is a weighted mean calculated from different stock values.

DJIA

14,198

13,338

10,606

11,625

12,929

13,589

16,577

18,054

Sunspot

Number

7.5

2.9

3.1

16.5

55.7

57.6

64.7

79.3

1. Data Analysis Use only the sunspot numbers for the following.

a. Find the mean, median, range, standard deviation, and variance.

b. Are the sunspot numbers categorical data or quantitative data?

c. What is the level of measurement of the data? (nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio)

Interpreting\({R^2}\)In Exercise 2, the quadratic model results in = 0.255. Identify the percentage of the variation in Super Bowl points that can be explained by the quadratic model relating the variable of year and the variable of points scored. (Hint: See Example 2.) What does the result suggest about the usefulness of the quadratic model?

Adjusted Coefficient of Determination For Exercise 2, why is it better to use values of adjusted \({R^2}\)instead of simply using values of \({R^2}\)?

Explore! Exercises 9 and 10 provide two data sets from “Graphs in Statistical Analysis,” by F. J. Anscombe, the American Statistician, Vol. 27. For each exercise,

a. Construct a scatterplot.

b. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, then determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the two variables.

c. Identify the feature of the data that would be missed if part (b) was completed without constructing the scatterplot.

x

10

8

13

9

11

14

6

4

12

7

5

y

9.14

8.14

8.74

8.77

9.26

8.10

6.13

3.10

9.13

7.26

4.74

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free