Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Variation and Prediction Intervals. In Exercises 17–20, find the (a) explained variation, (b) unexplained variation, and (c) indicated prediction interval. In each case, there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation, so it is reasonable to use the regression equation when making predictions.

Weighing Seals with a Camera The table below lists overhead widths (cm) of seals measured from photographs and the weights (kg) of the seals (based on “Mass Estimation of Weddell Seals Using Techniques of Photogrammetry,” by R. Garrott of Montana State University). For the prediction interval, use a 99% confidence level with an overhead width of 9.0 cm.

Overhead Width

7.2

7.4

9.8

9.4

8.8

8.4

Weight

116

154

245

202

200

191

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Explained Variation:8880.1818

(b) Unexplained Variation:991.1515

(c) 99% Prediction Interval: (124.97 cm, 284.55 cm)

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data are given on two variables, “Overhead Width” and “Weight”.

02

Regression equation

Let x denote the variable “Overhead Width.”

Let y denote the variable “Weight”.

The regression equation of y on x has the following notation:

\(\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\)where

\({b_0}\)is the intercept term

\({b_1}\)is the slope coefficient

The following calculations are done to compute the intercept and the slope coefficient:

The value of the y-intercept is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{b_0} &= \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {1108} \right)\left( {439} \right) - \left( {81} \right)\left( {9639} \right)}}{{8\left( {439} \right) - {{\left( {81} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= - 156.878788\\ \approx - 156.88\end{aligned}\)

The value of the slope coefficient is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{b_1} &= \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{\left( 6 \right)\left( {9639} \right) - \left( {51} \right)\left( {1108} \right)}}{{6\left( {439} \right) - {{\left( {51} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 40.181818\\ &\approx 40.18\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the regression equation becomes:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\hat y &= - 156.878788 + 40.181818x\\ \approx - 156.88 + 40.18x\end{aligned}\)

03

Predicted values

The mean value of observed y is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\bar y &= \frac{{\sum y }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{1108}}{6}\\ &= 184.6667\end{aligned}\)

The following table shows the predicted values (upon substituting the values of x in the regression equation), and other important calculations are done below:

The value of the explained variation is shown below:

\(\sum {{{\left( {\hat y - \bar y} \right)}^2}} = 8880.1818\)

Thus, the explained variation is equal to 8880.182.

The value of the unexplained variation is shown below:

\(\sum {{{\left( {y - \hat y} \right)}^2}} = 991.1515\)

Thus, the unexplained variation is equal to 991.1515.

04

Predicted value at \(\left( {{x_0}} \right)\)

Substituting the value of\({x_0} = 9\)in the regression equation, the predicted value is obtained as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\hat y &= - 156.878788 + 40.181818x\\ &= - 156.878788 + 40.181818\left( 9 \right)\\ &= 204.7576\end{aligned}\)

05

Level of significance and degrees of freedom

The following formula is used to compute the level of significance

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\;{\rm{Level}} &= 99\% \\100\left( {1 - \alpha } \right) &= 99\\1 - \alpha &= 0.99\\ &= 0.01\end{aligned}\)

The degrees of freedom for computing the value of the t-multiplier are shown below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= n - 2\\ &= 6 - 2\\ &= 4\end{aligned}\)

06

Value of t-multiplier, \({t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)

The value of the t-multiplier for a level of significance equal to 0.01and degrees of freedom equal to 4 is equal to 4.6041.

07

Standard error of the estimate

The value of the standard error of the estimate is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_e} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum {{{\left( {y - \hat y} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 2}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{991.1515}}{{6 - 2}}} \\ = 15.74128\end{array}\)

08

Value of \(\bar x\)

The value of\(\bar x\)is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x = \frac{{\sum x }}{n}\\ = \frac{{51}}{6}\\ = 8.5\end{array}\)

09

Prediction interval

Substitute the values obtained above to calculate the value of margin of error (E) as shown:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E &= {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}{s_e}\sqrt {1 + \frac{1}{n} + \frac{{n{{\left( {{x_0} - \bar x} \right)}^2}}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}} \\ &= \left( {4.6041} \right)\left( {15.74128} \right)\sqrt {1 + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{{6{{\left( {9 - 8.5} \right)}^2}}}{{6\left( {439} \right) - {{\left( {51} \right)}^2}}}} \\ &= 79.791718\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the prediction interval becomes:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}PI &= \left( {\hat y - E,\hat y + E} \right)\\ &= \left( {204.7576 - 79.791718,204.7576 + 79.791718} \right)\\ &= \left( {124.966,284.549} \right)\\ &\approx \left( {124.97,284.55} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the 99% prediction interval for the overhead width for the given value of weight equal to 9.0 cm is (124.97 cm, 284.55 cm).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Sports Repeat the preceding exercise using diameters and volumes.

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the foot lengths and heights to find the best predicted height of a male

who has a foot length of 28 cm. Would the result be helpful to police crime scene investigators in trying to describe the male?

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9–12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, Stat Crunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.


Testing for Correlation Use the information provided in the display to determine the value of the linear correlation coefficient. Is there sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between numbers of registered boats and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

POTUS Media periodically discuss the issue of heights of winning presidential candidates and heights of their main opponents. Listed below are those heights (cm) from severalrecent presidential elections (from Data Set 15 “Presidents” in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between heights of winning presidential candidates and heights of their main opponents? Should there be such a correlation?

President

178

182

188

175

179

183

192

182

177

185

188

188

183

188

Opponent

180

180

182

173

178

182

180

180

183

177

173

188

185

175

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 “Car Measurements” in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi, gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi, gal).

A Honda Civic weighs 2740 lb, it has an engine displacement of 1.8 L, and its highway fuel consumption is 36 mi/gal. What is the best predicted value of the city fuel consumption? Is that predicted value likely to be a good estimate? Is that predicted value likely to be very accurate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free