Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Conclusion The linear correlation coefficient r is found to be 0.499, the P-value is 0.393, and the critical values for a 0.05 significance level are\( \pm 0.878\). What should you conclude?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is no evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between the number of enrolment and burglaries at 0.05 significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

For the two variables, enrolment, and burglaries,

Correlation coefficient (r) is 0.499 with associated P-value as 0.393.

Critical values are -0.878 and 0.878 at 0.05 level of significance.

02

Identify the hypothesis

Here\(\rho \)represents the population correlation coefficient.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:\rho = 0\\{H_1}:\rho \ne 0\end{array}\)

03

State the decision rule

Comparing the P-value and significance level,

If\(P - value < \alpha \), reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, it can be concluded that there is a significant linear relationship between the two variables.

If\(P - value > \alpha \), fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, it can be concluded that there is nosignificant linear relationship between the two variables.

Asimilar result can be concluded using critical values.

  • If the correlation coefficient value lies between critical values, the result for correlation coefficient is insignificant.
  • If the correlation coefficient value does lie between critical values, the result for correlation coefficient is significant.
04

Step 4:State the conclusion for the correlation coefficient

Here\(P - value = 0.393\)and\(\alpha = 0.05\).

As\(P - value > 0.05\), wefail to reject the null hypothesis.

In a similar way, 0.499 lies between -0.878 and 0.878, which leads to the rejection of null hypothesis.

Thus, it can be concluded that there is not enough evidence fora significant linear correlation between enrolment and burglaries.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9โ€“12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, Stat Crunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.


Testing for Correlation Use the information provided in the display to determine the value of the linear correlation coefficient. Is there sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between numbers of registered boats and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13โ€“28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Oscars Listed below are ages of Oscar winners matched by the years in which the awards were won (from Data Set 14 โ€œOscar Winner Ageโ€ in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors? Should we expect that there would be a correlation?

Actress

28

30

29

61

32

33

45

29

62

22

44

54

Actor

43

37

38

45

50

48

60

50

39

55

44

33

What is the difference between the regression equation\(\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\)and the regression equation\(y = {\beta _0} + {\beta _1}x\)?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13โ€“28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

CPI and the Subway Use CPI>subway data from the preceding exercise to determine whether there is a significant linear correlation between the CPI (Consumer Price Index) and the subway fare.

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5โ€“8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Pizza and Subways r = 0.992 (x = cost of a slice of pizza, y = subway fare in New York City

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free