Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Using the listed lemon/crash data, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation is\(\hat y = - 0.0028x + 16.5\).

The best-predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports will be 15.1. The prediction is not worthwhile as the relationship between lemon imports and crash fatality does not make much sense.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data provides the information of the ‘lemon imports’ and ‘crash fatality rate’, as follows.

02

State the equation for the regression line

the formula for the estimated regression line is

\(y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\).

Here,

\({b_0}\)is the Y-intercept,

\({b_1}\)is the slope,

\(x\)is the explanatory variable, and

\(\hat y\) is the response variable (predicted value).

Let X denote the lemon imports and Y denote the crash fatality rate.

03

Compute the slope and intercept

The calculations required to compute the slope and intercept are as follows.

The sample size is \(\left( n \right) = 5\).

The slope is computed as

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_1} = \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{5 \times 28571.7 - 1863 \times 77.2}}{{5 \times 762589 - {{1863}^2}}}\\ = - 0.00282\end{array}\).

The intercept is computed as

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_0} = \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{77.2 \times 762589 - 1863 \times 28571.7}}{{5 \times 762589 - {{1863}^2}}}\\ = 16.4909\end{array}\).

Thus, the estimated regression equation is

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = 16.5 - 0.0028x\end{array}\).

04

Check the model

Refer to exercise 19 of section 10-1 for the following result.

1) The scatter plot shows an approximate linear relationship between the variables.

2) The P-value is 0.0010.

As theP-value is less than the level of significance (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the correlation is statistically significant.

Referring to figure 10-5, the criteria for a good regression model are satisfied.

Thus, the regression equation can be used for prediction.

05

Compute the prediction

Substitute 500 metric tons of lemons in the estimated linear regression model for the crash fatality rate.

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = 16.5 - 0.0028x\\ = 16.5 - 0.0028\left( {500} \right)\\ = 15.1\end{array}\).

Therefore, the best-predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports will be 15.1.

The predictions do not seem worthwhile as the relationship between the two variables does not make sense.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 “Car Measurements” in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi/gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi/gal).

If only one predictor (x) variable is used to predict the city fuel consumption, which single variable is best? Why?

In exercise 10-1 12. Clusters Refer to the following Minitab-generated scatterplot. The four points in the lower left corner are measurements from women, and the four points in the upper right corner are from men.

a. Examine the pattern of the four points in the lower left corner (from women) only, and subjectively determine whether there appears to be a correlation between x and y for women.

b. Examine the pattern of the four points in the upper right corner (from men) only, and subjectively determine whether there appears to be a correlation between x and y for men.

c. Find the linear correlation coefficient using only the four points in the lower left corner (for women). Will the four points in the upper left corner (for men) have the same linear correlation coefficient?

d. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient using all eight points. What does that value suggest about the relationship between x and y?

e. Based on the preceding results, what do you conclude? Should the data from women and the data from men be considered together, or do they appear to represent two different and distinct populations that should be analyzed separately?

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Internet and Nobel Laureates Find the best predicted Nobel Laureate rate for Japan, which has 79.1 Internet users per 100 people. How does it compare to Japan’s Nobel Laureate rate of 1.5 per 10 million people?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Conclusion The linear correlation coefficient r is found to be 0.499, the P-value is 0.393, and the critical values for a 0.05 significance level are\( \pm 0.878\). What should you conclude?

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 “Car Measurements” in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi, gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi, gal).

A Honda Civic weighs 2740 lb, it has an engine displacement of 1.8 L, and its highway fuel consumption is 36 mi/gal. What is the best predicted value of the city fuel consumption? Is that predicted value likely to be a good estimate? Is that predicted value likely to be very accurate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free