Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the pizza costs and subway fares to find the best predicted

subway fare, given that the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00. Is the best predicted subway fare likely to be implemented?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation is\(\hat y = - 0.0111 + 1.01x\).

The best-predicted ‘subway fare’ for the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00 will be approximately $3.02. The best-predicted subway fare of $3.02 is not likely to be implemented due to its convenience to use in a real situation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data provides the information of the pizza cost (in dollars) and subway fare as follows.

02

State the estimated regression line

The formula for the estimated regression line is

\(y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\).

Here,

\({b_0}\)is the Y-intercept,

\({b_1}\)is the slope,

\(x\)is the explanatory variable, and

\(\hat y\)is the response variable (predicted value).

Let X denotes the cost of a pizza slice (in dollars) and Y denote the subway fare (in dollars).

03

Compute the slope and intercept

The calculations required to compute the slope and intercept are as follows.

The sample size is \(\left( n \right) = 9\).

The slope is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_1} = \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{9 \times 27.8325 - 13.8 \times 13.85}}{{9 \times 27.685 - {{13.8}^2}}}\\ = 1.010856\end{array}\).

The intercept is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_0} = \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{13.8 \times 27.685 - 13.8 \times 27.8325}}{{9 \times 27.685 - {{13.8}^2}}}\\ = - 0.01109\end{array}\).

Thus, the estimated regression equation is

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = - 0.011 + 1.012x\end{array}\).

04

Check the model

Refer to exercise 15 of section 10-1 for the following result.

1) The scatter plot shows an approximate linear relationship between the variables.

2)The P-value is 0.000.

As the P-value is less than the level of significance (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the correlation is statistically significant.

Referring to figure 10-5, the criteria for a good regression model are satisfied.

Thus, the prediction is made using a regression equation.

05

Compute the prediction

The best-predicted subway fare for the cost of a slice of pizza of $3.00 is required.

Therefore, the estimated value for $3.00 is

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = - 0.0111 + 1.01x\\ = - 0.0111 + 1.01 \times 3\\ \approx 3.02\end{array}\).

Therefore, the best-predicted subway fare for the cost of a slice of pizza, which is $3.00, will be approximately $3.02.

The prediction of $3.02 is not likely to be possible as the denomination is not a convenient value, as compared to values like $3.25 or $3.00.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explore! Exercises 9 and 10 provide two data sets from “Graphs in Statistical Analysis,” by F. J. Anscombe, the American Statistician, Vol. 27. For each exercise,

a. Construct a scatterplot.

b. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, then determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the two variables.

c. Identify the feature of the data that would be missed if part (b) was completed without constructing the scatterplot.

x

10

8

13

9

11

14

6

4

12

7

5

y

9.14

8.14

8.74

8.77

9.26

8.10

6.13

3.10

9.13

7.26

4.74

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Sports Repeat the preceding exercise using diameters and volumes.

Different hotels on Las Vegas Boulevard (“the strip”) in Las Vegas are randomly selected, and their ratings and prices were obtained from Travelocity. Using technology, with xrepresenting the ratings and yrepresenting price, we find that the regression equation has a slope of 130 and a y-intercept of -368.

a. What is the equation of the regression line?

b. What does the symbol\(\hat y\)represent?

Interpreting r. In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the accompanying displays.

5. Bear Weight and Chest Size Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in Data Set 9 “Bear Measurements” in Appendix B; results are shown in the accompanying Statdisk display. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9–12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, Stat Crunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.


Testing for Correlation Use the information provided in the display to determine the value of the linear correlation coefficient. Is there sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between numbers of registered boats and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free