Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the pizza costs and subway fares to find the best predicted

subway fare, given that the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00. Is the best predicted subway fare likely to be implemented?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation is\(\hat y = - 0.0111 + 1.01x\).

The best-predicted ‘subway fare’ for the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00 will be approximately $3.02. The best-predicted subway fare of $3.02 is not likely to be implemented due to its convenience to use in a real situation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data provides the information of the pizza cost (in dollars) and subway fare as follows.

02

State the estimated regression line

The formula for the estimated regression line is

\(y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\).

Here,

\({b_0}\)is the Y-intercept,

\({b_1}\)is the slope,

\(x\)is the explanatory variable, and

\(\hat y\)is the response variable (predicted value).

Let X denotes the cost of a pizza slice (in dollars) and Y denote the subway fare (in dollars).

03

Compute the slope and intercept

The calculations required to compute the slope and intercept are as follows.

The sample size is \(\left( n \right) = 9\).

The slope is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_1} = \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{9 \times 27.8325 - 13.8 \times 13.85}}{{9 \times 27.685 - {{13.8}^2}}}\\ = 1.010856\end{array}\).

The intercept is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_0} = \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{13.8 \times 27.685 - 13.8 \times 27.8325}}{{9 \times 27.685 - {{13.8}^2}}}\\ = - 0.01109\end{array}\).

Thus, the estimated regression equation is

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = - 0.011 + 1.012x\end{array}\).

04

Check the model

Refer to exercise 15 of section 10-1 for the following result.

1) The scatter plot shows an approximate linear relationship between the variables.

2)The P-value is 0.000.

As the P-value is less than the level of significance (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the correlation is statistically significant.

Referring to figure 10-5, the criteria for a good regression model are satisfied.

Thus, the prediction is made using a regression equation.

05

Compute the prediction

The best-predicted subway fare for the cost of a slice of pizza of $3.00 is required.

Therefore, the estimated value for $3.00 is

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = - 0.0111 + 1.01x\\ = - 0.0111 + 1.01 \times 3\\ \approx 3.02\end{array}\).

Therefore, the best-predicted subway fare for the cost of a slice of pizza, which is $3.00, will be approximately $3.02.

The prediction of $3.02 is not likely to be possible as the denomination is not a convenient value, as compared to values like $3.25 or $3.00.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5–8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Crickets and Temperature r = 0.874 (x = number of cricket chirps in 1 minute, y = temperature in °F)

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 “Car Measurements” in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi/gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi/gal).

If only one predictor (x) variable is used to predict the city fuel consumption, which single variable is best? Why?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Revised mpg Ratings Listed below are combined city-highway fuel economy ratings (in mi>gal) for different cars. The old ratings are based on tests used before 2008 and the new ratings are based on tests that went into effect in 2008. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the old ratings and the new ratings? What do the data suggest about the old ratings?

Old

16

27

17

33

28

24

18

22

20

29

21

New

15

24

15

29

25

22

16

20

18

26

19

Interpreting a Graph The accompanying graph plots the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing. The graph of the quadratic equation that best fits the data is also shown in red. What feature of the graph justifies the value of\({R^2}\)= 0.255 for the quadratic model?

What is the relationship between the linear correlation coefficient rand the slope\({b_1}\)of a regression line?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free