Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use the Runge-Kutta method and the Runge-Kutta semilinear method with step sizes \(h=0.1\), \(\bar{h}=0.05,\) and \(h=0.025\) to find approximate values of the solution of the initial value problem $$ y^{\prime}+3 y=e^{-3 x}\left(1-4 x+3 x^{2}-4 x^{3}\right), \quad y(0)=-3 $$ at \(x=0,0.1,0.2,0.3, \ldots, 1.0 .\) Compare these approximate values with the values of the exact solution \(y=-e^{-3 x}\left(3-x+2 x^{2}-x^{3}+x^{4}\right)\), which can be obtained by the method of Section 2.1. Do you notice anything special about the results? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Compare the approximate values obtained from the Runge-Kutta method and Runge-Kutta semilinear method with the exact solution values, and comment on whether there is anything special observed in the results.

Step by step solution

01

Phase 1: Runge-Kutta Method

1. For each step size, compute the Runge-Kutta coefficients as follows: · \(k_1 = hf(x_n, y_n)\) · \(k_2 = hf(x_n + \frac{1}{2}h, y_n + \frac{1}{2}k_1)\) · \(k_3 = hf(x_n + \frac{1}{2}h, y_n + \frac{1}{2}k_2)\) · \(k_4 = hf(x_n + h, y_n + k_3)\) 2. Update the solution: · \(y_{n+1} = y_n + \frac{1}{6}(k_1 + 2k_2 + 2k_3 + k_4)\) 3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 for \(x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, ..., 1.0\) and record the approximate values using step sizes \(h = 0.1\), \(\bar{h} = 0.05\), and \(h = 0.025\).
02

Phase 2: Runge-Kutta Semilinear Method

1. For each step size, compute the Runge-Kutta semilinear coefficients as follows: · \(k_1 = hf(x_n, y_n)\) · \(k_2 = hf(x_n + \frac{1}{2}h, y_n + \frac{1}{4}k_1)\) · \(k_3 = hf(x_n + \frac{3}{4}h, y_n + \frac{3}{4}k_2)\) 2. Update the solution: · \(y_{n+1} = y_n + \frac{1}{9}(2k_1 + 3k_2 + 4k_3)\) 3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 for \(x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, ..., 1.0\) and record the approximate values using step sizes \(h = 0.1\), \(\bar{h} = 0.05\), and \(h = 0.025\).
03

Phase 3: Calculate Exact Solution Values

Calculate the exact solution, \(y(x) = -e^{-3x}(3-x + 2x^2 - x^3 + x^4)\), at each point \(x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, ..., 1.0\) and record the values.
04

Phase 4: Compare & Observe

Compare the approximate values obtained from the Runge-Kutta method and Runge-Kutta semilinear method with the exact solution values and comment on whether there is anything special observed in the results. Notice that as the step size decreases, the approximate values from both the Runge-Kutta method and the Runge-Kutta semilinear method get closer to the exact solution's values. This showcases the accuracy improvement achieved by using smaller step sizes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Numerical Analysis
Numerical analysis plays a crucial role in solving mathematical problems, especially those without straightforward analytical solutions. It is a branch of mathematics that develops methods to approximate solutions for complex equations. The Runge-Kutta method is a popular numerical technique used to solve differential equations, a task that otherwise might be intractable analytically.
This method allows for the computation of approximate solutions with a high degree of accuracy, which is essential in many scientific and engineering applications. The core idea is to replace continuous mathematical models with discrete approximations that can be solved using algorithms.
The accuracy of numerical methods, like Runge-Kutta, is dependent on factors such as step size, iteration count, and the inherent stability of the model. These methods allow us to handle initial value problems and examine their behavior over a set interval.
Initial Value Problem
An initial value problem (IVP) is characterized by a differential equation along with a specified initial condition. In other words, it is the determination of a function that satisfies a given differential equation and passes through a specified point, known as the initial value.
Mathematically, an IVP looks like this: ⁠\( y' = f(x, y) \)⁠ with an initial condition \( y(x_0) = y_0 \). Here, the function \( y(x) \) is what we're trying to find, and it must satisfy both the differential equation and the initial condition.
In the current exercise, we are trying to solve the initial value problem where \( y' + 3y = e^{-3x}(1 - 4x + 3x^2 - 4x^3) \) and \( y(0) = -3 \) using the Runge-Kutta method. The goal is to calculate approximate values of \( y \) at different points using numerical methods.
Differential Equations
Differential equations are equations that involve an unknown function and its derivatives. They are vital in modeling the behaviors encountered in physics, engineering, economics, and other science fields.
This exercise focuses on solving a particular differential equation numerically. In this case, the equation is \( y' + 3y = e^{-3x}(1 - 4x + 3x^2 - 4x^3) \). Solving such equations helps to predict future behaviors and understand the underlying system dynamics.
Differential equations can often be classified into ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and partial differential equations (PDEs). The exercise provided deals with an ordinary differential equation, as it contains one independent variable, namely \( x \).
The Runge-Kutta methods are particularly well-suited for this type of problem as they provide a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy, making them a preferred choice for many numerical analysis applications.
Step Size
Step size is a crucial component in numerical methods like the Runge-Kutta method. It refers to the interval at which the function values are calculated during the approximation process. Choosing the right step size is vital for maintaining accuracy and efficiency.
Smaller step sizes generally lead to better approximations of the solution since they capture the function's behavior more accurately. However, smaller steps also mean more computations, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Larger step sizes can reduce computation time but might miss important behavior, leading to less accurate results.
In the exercise, different step sizes ( \( h = 0.1 \), \( \bar{h} = 0.05 \), and \( h = 0.025 \)) are used to find approximate solutions. The comparison of results with varying step sizes demonstrates how decreased step sizes improve the approximation's closeness to the exact solution. This highlights the delicate balance between precision and computational load in numerical methods.
Exact Solution
An exact solution is one that completely satisfies the differential equation and any initial or boundary conditions. It is the ultimate goal of solving equations, although it is not always possible to find exact solutions due to their complexity.
In this exercise, alongside the numerical methods, the exact solution is provided as \( y = -e^{-3x}(3 - x + 2x^2 - x^3 + x^4) \). This solution serves as a benchmark to assess the accuracy of the approximate solutions obtained from the Runge-Kutta method
Comparing approximate solutions against the exact one highlights how close or far we are from the true behavior of the system described by the differential equation. As observed in the exercise, the approximate solutions get closer to the exact values with decreasing step sizes, showcasing the improvement in precision that comes with smaller discretization intervals.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Example 2.2 .3 it was shown that $$ y^{5}+y=x^{2}+x-4 $$ is an implicit solution of the initial value problem $$ y^{\prime}=\frac{2 x+1}{5 y^{4}+1}, \quad y(2)=1 $$ Use Euler's method with step sizes \(h=0.1, h=0.05,\) and \(h=0.025\) to find approximate values of the solution of (A) at \(x=2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3, \ldots, 3.0 .\) Present your results in tabular form. To check the error in these approximate values, construct another table of values of the residual $$ R(x, y)=y^{5}+y-x^{2}-x+4 $$ for each value of \((x, y)\) appearing in the first table.

You can see from Example 2.5 .1 that $$ x^{4} y^{3}+x^{2} y^{5}+2 x y=4 $$ is an implicit solution of the initial value problem $$ y^{\prime}=-\frac{4 x^{3} y^{3}+2 x y^{5}+2 y}{3 x^{4} y^{2}+5 x^{2} y^{4}+2 x}, \quad y(1)=1 $$ Use Euler's method with step sizes \(h=0.1, h=0.05\), and \(h=0.025\) to find approximate values of the solution of (A) at \(x=1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3, \ldots, 2.0 .\) Present your results in tabular form. To check the error in these approximate values, construct another table of values of the residual $$ R(x, y)=x^{4} y^{3}+x^{2} y^{5}+2 x y-4 $$ for each value of \((x, y)\) appearing in the first table.

You may want to save the results of these exercises, sincewe'll revisit in the next two sections.Use Euler's method to find approximate values of the solution of the given initial value problem at the points \(x_{i}=x_{0}+i h,\) where \(x_{0}\) is the point wher the initial condition is imposed and \(i=1,2,3\). The purpose of these exercises is to familiarize you with the computational procedure of Euler's method. $$ y^{\prime}+3 y=x^{2}-3 x y+y^{2}, \quad y(0)=2 ; \quad h=0.05 $$

Use Euler's method and the Euler semilinear method with step sizes \(h=0.1, h=0.05,\) and \(h=0.025\) to find approximate values of the solution of the initial value problem $$ y^{\prime}+3 y=7 e^{-3 x}, \quad y(0)=6 $$ at \(x=0,0.1,0.2,0.3, \ldots, 1.0\). Compare these approximate values with the values of the exact solution \(y=e^{-3 x}(7 x+6)\), which can be obtained by the method of Section 2.1. Do you notice anything special about the results? Explain.

Use the improved Euler method with step sizes \(h=0.1, h=0.05,\) and \(h=0.025\) to find approximate values of the solution of the initial value problem $$ y^{\prime}+\frac{(y+1)(y-1)(y-2)}{x+1}=0, \quad y(1)=0 \text { (Exercise } $$ at \(x=1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3, \ldots, 2.0\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free