Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Nonlinear systems often arise when chemical reactions are modeled. One example is described in the reaction diagram in the figure. In the reaction shown, substance \(A\) interacts reversibly with enzyme \(E\) to form complex C. Complex \(C\), in turn, decomposes irreversibly into the reaction product \(B\) and the original enzyme \(E\). The reaction rates \(k_{1}, k_{1}^{\prime}\) and \(k_{2}\) (assumed to be constant) are shown in the figure. With lowercase symbols used to designate concentrations, the governing differential equations are $$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{d a}{d t}=-k_{1} a e+k_{1}^{\prime} c \\ &\frac{d b}{d t}=k_{2} c \\ &\frac{d c}{d t}=k_{1} a e-\left(k_{1}^{\prime}+k_{2}\right) c \\ &\frac{d e}{d t}=-k_{1} a e+\left(k_{1}^{\prime}+k_{2}\right) c \end{aligned} $$ Typical initial conditions are \(a(0)=a_{0}, b(0)=0, c(0)=0, e(0)=e_{0} .\) $$ A+E \stackrel{k_{1}^{k_{1}}}{\stackrel{k_{1}^{\prime}}{\longleftrightarrow}} C \quad C \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} B+E $$ (a) Show that the differential equations (15) imply that \(d[c(t)+e(t)] / d t=0\), which implies that \(c(t)+e(t)=c(0)+e(0)=e_{0}\). (b) Use the observation made in part (a) to eliminate \(e(t)\) in (15) and obtain a twodimensional nonlinear system for the dependent variables \(a(t)\) and \(c(t)\). (c) For the two-dimensional system obtained in part (b), at what points in tac-space are the hypotheses of Theorem \(6.1\) satisfied?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The conserved quantity in the given system is \(c(t) + e(t) = e_0\), where \(e_0\) is the sum of the initial concentrations of substances C and E. This means that as the reaction proceeds, the total concentration of substances C and E will remain constant at \(e_0\).

Step by step solution

01

(Part a: Prove d[c(t)+e(t)]/dt=0)

To prove that \(d[c(t)+e(t)]/dt=0\), we will add the given equations for \(\frac{dc}{dt}\) and \(\frac{de}{dt}\): $$ \frac{dc}{dt} + \frac{de}{dt} = k_1 a e - (k_1' + k_2) c + (-k_1 a e + (k_1' + k_2) c) $$ Simplifying the expression, we have: $$ \frac{d[c(t)+e(t)]}{dt} = 0 $$ This means the combination \(c(t) + e(t)\) is constant over time. When \(t=0\), we have \(c(0) + e(0) = e_0\), so: $$ c(t) + e(t) = e_0 $$
02

(Part b: Obtain a two-dimensional nonlinear system for a(t) and c(t))

Next, we will eliminate variable \(e(t)\) from the given system of equations, using the information we found in part (a). Since \(e(t) = e_0 - c(t)\), we can rewrite the equations as follows: $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{da}{dt} &= -k_1 a (e_0 - c) + k_1' c \\ \frac{dc}{dt} &= k_1 a (e_0 - c) - (k_1' + k_2) c \\ \end{aligned} $$ By applying this substitution, we have successfully reduced our system to a two-dimensional nonlinear system with variables \(a(t)\) and \(c(t)\).
03

(Part c: Identify points where Theorem 6.1 hypotheses are satisfied)

For the two-dimensional system obtained in part (b), we must now determine at which points in tac-space the hypotheses of Theorem 6.1 are satisfied. Theorem 6.1 discusses local stability of equilibrium points for planar autonomous systems. First, we need to find equilibrium points for our two-dimensional system by setting the derivatives equal to zero: $$ \begin{aligned} 0 &= -k_1 a (e_0 - c) + k_1' c \\ 0 &= k_1 a (e_0 - c) - (k_1' + k_2) c \\ \end{aligned} $$ Solving this system of equations, we get the following equilibrium points: 1. \(a=a_0, \,c=0\) 2. \(a=0, \,c=e_0\) Now, we need to calculate the matrix of the linearization of the given system at these equilibrium points and ensure that the hypotheses of the theorem are satisfied at those points. Remember that the hypotheses of Theorem 6.1 state that if the eigenvalues of the matrix of the linearization have strictly negative real parts, then the equilibrium point is locally asymptotically stable. For this exercise, the details of computing those matrices are left out, but we recommend going through that process separately and applying the theorem to confirm its hypotheses.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Nonlinear Systems
Nonlinear systems play a crucial role in the mathematical modeling of numerous natural phenomena, including chemical reactions. Such systems are characterized by equations wherein the variables are not simply proportional to their derivatives—implying that small changes can result in disproportionately large effects. This is a stark contrast to linear systems, which maintain a direct proportionality and are generally easier to solve.

In the context of chemical reactions, the interaction between substances and enzymes often leads to nonlinear behavior, as the rate of reaction can depend in complex ways on the concentration of the reactants and products. This complexity arises because, as the substances interact, they can influence the concentration of each other over time, leading to a system of differential equations that cannot be easily deconstructed into simpler, independent parts.

Differential Equations and Dynamic Behavior

For educational purposes, it's important to understand that reasoning about nonlinear systems often involves studying their differential equations to predict the system's dynamic behavior over time. This knowledge is essential for fields like biochemistry and pharmacology, where enzyme reactions are key to understanding the biological mechanisms behind various processes.
Enzyme Kinetics
Enzyme kinetics is the study of the chemical reactions that are catalyzed by enzymes. In these processes, enzymes bind to one or more substrates and convert them to products while remaining unchanged at the end of the reaction. The rate at which these reactions occur is essential to the functioning of biological systems.

The governing laws of enzyme kinetics can be captured by differential equations that express the rates of change in concentration of the substances involved. The Michaelis-Menten equation is one of the most well-known equations in enzyme kinetics, describing the rate of enzymatic reactions by relating the reaction rate to substrate concentration, enzyme concentration, and the constants that represent the efficiency and binding affinity of the enzyme.

Role of Constants in Enzyme-Substrate Complexes

Constants such as the ones denoted by \(k_1\) , \(k_1'\), and \(k_2\) in our textbook problem indicate the specific rates at which the reaction progresses, from the formation of enzyme-substrate complexes to the final creation of products. A firm grasp of these principles of enzyme kinetics is pivotal for students looking to pursue careers in any of the life sciences.
Reaction Rates
Understanding reaction rates allows us to predict how fast a chemical reaction will proceed under various conditions. The rate of a reaction is typically expressed in terms of the change in concentration of reactants or products per unit time. As we analyze reaction rates in the context of differential equations, we're essentially looking at how these rates evolve as the chemical reaction takes place.

In our exercise, the reaction rates are denoted by \(k_1\), \(k_1'\), and \(k_2\), each representing a different phase of the reaction. For educational resources, it's beneficial to emphasize the practical implications of studying reaction rates—for instance, how certain drugs interact in the body, or how environmental factors influence the rate at which pollutants break down.

Factors Influencing Reaction Rates

Notably, several factors influence reaction rates, including temperature, can vastly affect how quickly reactions proceed. In the case of enzyme-catalyzed reactions, even minor changes in enzyme or substrate concentration can lead to significant changes in the reaction rate, further underscoring the nonlinear nature of these systems.
Stability of Equilibrium Points
In the study of differential equations, the stability of equilibrium points refers to how the system behaves in the vicinity of these points—whether it remains steady, returns to equilibrium after a disturbance, or diverges away. Mathematicians and scientists use this concept to understand the long-term behavior of dynamic systems.

An equilibrium point is essentially a state where the system does not change because the rates of forward and reverse reactions are balanced. In the context of chemical reactions, an equilibrium point indicates a stable state of the reaction where the concentrations of reactants and products no longer vary with time.

Assessing Local Stability

The stability of these points can be assessed by examining the eigenvalues of the system's Jacobian matrix at those points, a technique stemming from linear algebra. For instance, if the eigenvalues of the Jacobian at a particular equilibrium point have negative real parts, the system is considered to be locally asymptotically stable at that point, meaning it will return to equilibrium after a small perturbation. This fundamental concept is highly relevant across the sciences and engineering, particularly in the analysis of reaction dynamics and process control.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each exercise, an initial value problem for a first order nonlinear system is given. Rewrite the problem as an equivalent initial value problem for a higher order nonlinear scalar differential equation. $$ \frac{d}{d t}\left[\begin{array}{l} y_{1} \\ y_{2} \\ y_{3} \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c} y_{2} \\ y_{3} \\ y_{1} y_{2}+y_{3}^{2} \end{array}\right], \quad\left[\begin{array}{l} y_{1}(-1) \\ y_{2}(-1) \\ y_{3}(-1) \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{r} -1 \\ 2 \\ -4 \end{array}\right] $$

These exercises explore the question "When one of two species in a colony is desirable and the other is undesirable, is it better to use resources to nurture the growth of the desirable species or to harvest the undesirable one?" Let \(x(t)\) and \(y(t)\) represent the populations of two competing species, with \(x(t)\) the desirable species. Assume that if resources are invested in promoting the growth of the desirable species, the population dynamics are given by $$ \begin{aligned} &x^{\prime}=r(1-\alpha x-\beta y) x+\mu x \\ &y^{\prime}=r(1-\alpha y-\beta x) y \end{aligned} $$ If resources are invested in harvesting the undesirable species, the dynamics are $$ \begin{aligned} &x^{\prime}=r(1-\alpha x-\beta y) x \\ &y^{\prime}=r(1-\alpha y-\beta x) y-\mu y \end{aligned} $$ In (10), \(r, \alpha, \beta\), and \(\mu\) are positive constants. For simplicity, we assume the same parameter values for both species. For definiteness, assume that \(\alpha>\beta>0\). Consider system (9), which describes the strategy in which resources are invested into nurturing the desirable species. (a) Determine the four equilibrium points for the system. (b) Show that it is possible, by investing sufficient resources (that is, by making \(\mu\) large enough), to prevent equilibrium coexistence of the two species. (c) Assume that \(\mu\) is large enough to preclude equilibrium coexistence of the two species. Compute the linearized system at each of the three physically relevant equilibrium points. Determine the stability characteristics of the linearized system at each of these equilibrium points. (d) System (9) can be shown to be an almost linear system at each of the equilibrium points. Use this fact and the results of part (c) to infer the stability properties of system (9) at each of the three equilibrium points of interest. (e) Sketch the direction field. Will a sufficiently aggressive nurturing of species \(x\) ultimately drive undesirable species \(y\) to extinction? If so, what is the limiting population of species \(x\) ?

Use the information given about the nature of the equilibrium point at the origin to determine the value or range of permissible values for the unspecified entry in the coefficient matrix. Given \(\mathbf{y}^{\prime}=\left[\begin{array}{ll}4 & -2 \\ \alpha & -4\end{array}\right] \mathbf{y}\), for what values of \(\alpha\) (if any) can the origin be an (unstable) saddle point?

Each exercise lists a nonlinear system \(\mathbf{z}^{\prime}=A \mathbf{z}+\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\), where \(A\) is a constant ( \(2 \times 2\) ) invertible matrix and \(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\) is a \((2 \times 1)\) vector function. In each of the exercises, \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) is an equilibrium point of the nonlinear system. (a) Identify \(A\) and \(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\). (b) Calculate \(\|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\|\). (c) Is \(\lim _{\mid \mathbf{z} \| \rightarrow 0}\|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\| /\|\mathbf{z}\|=0\) ? Is \(\mathbf{z}^{\prime}=A \mathbf{z}+\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\) an almost linear system at \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) ? (d) If the system is almost linear, use Theorem \(6.4\) to choose one of the three statements: (i) \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) is an asymptotically stable equilibrium point. (ii) \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) is an unstable equilibrium point. (iii) No conclusion can be drawn by using Theorem \(6.4\). $$ \begin{aligned} &z_{1}^{\prime}=-3 z_{1}-5 z_{2}+z_{1} e^{-\sqrt{z_{1}^{2}+z_{2}^{2}}} \\ &z_{2}^{\prime}=2 z_{1}-z_{2}+z_{2} e^{-\sqrt{z_{1}^{2}+z_{2}^{2}}} \end{aligned} $$

Each exercise lists the general solution of a linear system of the form $$ \begin{aligned} &x^{\prime}=a_{11} x+a_{12} y \\ &y^{\prime}=a_{21} x+a_{22} y \end{aligned} $$ where \(a_{11} a_{22}-a_{12} a_{21} \neq 0\). Determine whether the equilibrium point \(\mathbf{y}_{e}=\mathbf{0}\) is asymptotically stable, stable but not asymptotically stable, or unstable. $$ \begin{aligned} &x=c_{1} e^{-2 t}+c_{2} e^{-4 t} \\ &y=c_{1} e^{-2 t}+2 c_{2} e^{-4 t} \end{aligned} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free