Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Each exercise lists a nonlinear system \(\mathbf{z}^{\prime}=A \mathbf{z}+\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\), where \(A\) is a constant ( \(2 \times 2\) ) invertible matrix and \(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\) is a \((2 \times 1)\) vector function. In each of the exercises, \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) is an equilibrium point of the nonlinear system. (a) Identify \(A\) and \(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\). (b) Calculate \(\|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\|\). (c) Is \(\lim _{\mid \mathbf{z} \| \rightarrow 0}\|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\| /\|\mathbf{z}\|=0\) ? Is \(\mathbf{z}^{\prime}=A \mathbf{z}+\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\) an almost linear system at \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) ? (d) If the system is almost linear, use Theorem \(6.4\) to choose one of the three statements: (i) \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) is an asymptotically stable equilibrium point. (ii) \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) is an unstable equilibrium point. (iii) No conclusion can be drawn by using Theorem \(6.4\). $$ \begin{aligned} &z_{1}^{\prime}=2 z_{2}+z_{2}^{2} \\ &z_{2}^{\prime}=-2 z_{1}+z_{1} z_{2} \end{aligned} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
$$ \begin{aligned} z_1^{\prime}=2z_2+z_2^2 \\ z_2^{\prime}=-2z_1+z_1z_2 \end{aligned} $$ Answer: No conclusion can be drawn by using Theorem 6.4.

Step by step solution

01

Identify A and \(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\)

First, we need to identify the matrix A and the vector function \(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\). Comparing the given equations to the general form: \(\mathbf{z}^{\prime}=A\mathbf{z}+\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\), we can identify the following: $$ \begin{aligned} &A= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ -2 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \\\ \\ &\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z}) = \begin{pmatrix} z_2^2 \\ z_1z_2 \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned} $$
02

Calculate \(\|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\|\)

To calculate the norm of the vector function \(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\), we can use the Euclidean norm formula: $$ \|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\| = \sqrt{(z_2^2)^2 + (z_1z_2)^2} = \sqrt{z_2^4 + z_1^2z_2^2} $$
03

Determine if the system is almost linear

To check if the system is almost linear, we need to find the limit \(\lim_{\|\mathbf{z}\|\rightarrow 0}\frac{\|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\|}{\|\mathbf{z}\|}\). If this limit is equal to 0, then the system is almost linear at \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\). Using the result from Step 2, we obtain: $$ \lim_{\|\mathbf{z}\|\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sqrt{z_2^4 + z_1^2z_2^2}}{\sqrt{z_1^2 + z_2^2}} = 0 $$ Since the limit is 0, the system is almost linear at \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\).
04

Apply Theorem 6.4 to determine the nature of the equilibrium point

Now that the system is almost linear, we can apply Theorem 6.4 to conclude the stability of the equilibrium point \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\). For this, we need to find the eigenvalues of matrix A. Matrix A is given by: $$ A= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ -2 & 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ The characteristic equation is: $$ \det(A-\lambda I) = \det\begin{pmatrix}-\lambda & 2 \\ -2 & -\lambda\end{pmatrix} = \lambda^2 + 4 $$ Solving for the eigenvalues: $$ \lambda^2 + 4 = 0 \\ \Rightarrow \lambda = \pm 2i $$ Both eigenvalues have zero real parts. Since we don't have any eigenvalue with a positive real part, we can't conclude about the stability or instability of the equilibrium point \(\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}\) using Theorem 6.4. Therefore, the correct statement is: (iii) No conclusion can be drawn by using Theorem 6.4.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Equilibrium Point
An equilibrium point in a system of differential equations is a point where the system is at rest. This means no change occurs at this point; the derivatives of the system variables are zero. In the context of nonlinear systems, particularly in the exercise described, the equilibrium point is \( \mathbf{z} = \mathbf{0} \). This signifies that when the values of all variables in the system are zero, the system remains unchanged over time.

To find equilibrium points in general, you set the system of equations equal to zero and solve for the variables. For the given nonlinear system with \( z_1' = 2z_2 + z_2^2 \) and \( z_2' = -2z_1 + z_1z_2 \), setting both equations to zero leads us to confirm that \( \mathbf{z} = \mathbf{0} \) is indeed an equilibrium point. Finding equilibrium points helps understand the system's behavior at specific states.

  • Equilibrium points are essential in studying dynamical systems because they indicate potential system stability.
  • Nonlinear systems can have multiple equilibrium points.
  • The stability of these points determines how the system responds to disturbances.
Almost Linear System
An almost linear system is an approximation where the behavior of a nonlinear system near an equilibrium point is similar to a linear system. This concept is instrumental in simplifying the analysis of nonlinear systems.

In the exercise, we need to determine if the given system \( \mathbf{z}' = A\mathbf{z} + \mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z}) \) is almost linear around the equilibrium point \( \mathbf{z} = \mathbf{0} \). To do this, we evaluate the limit \( \lim_{\|\mathbf{z}\| \rightarrow 0}\frac{\|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\|}{\|\mathbf{z}\|} \). If the limit equals zero, the system behaves like a linear system near this point.

This is seen when comparing the non-linear parts of a system to a linear one by evaluating \( \|\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{z})\| \) to assess its effects as \( \|\mathbf{z}\| \) tends towards zero. When successful, this indicates that the system's nonlinear components become negligible, affirming the system's almost linear nature.

  • Determining almost linearity aids in simplifying complex systems into more manageable linear forms.
  • Linear approximations are powerful in predicting system behavior near equilibrium.
  • Even though a system is nonlinear, its resemblance to linear systems can help apply linear theory for analysis.
Matrix Eigenvalues
Matrix eigenvalues are pivotal in understanding the stability of equilibrium points in systems of differential equations. These values are derived from the matrix formed by the linear component of the system.

In the exercise, given the matrix \( A = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \ -2 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \), eigenvalues are found by solving the characteristic equation:
\[ \det(A-\lambda I) = \lambda^2 + 4 = 0 \]

which gives the eigenvalues \( \lambda = \pm 2i \). These eigenvalues are purely imaginary, meaning they have no real part.

  • Eigenvalues indicate stability: if all eigenvalues have negative real parts, the equilibrium is asymptotically stable.
  • If any have positive real parts, the equilibrium is unstable.
  • Purely imaginary or zero real part eigenvalues, as in this case, make it impossible to deduce the stability with linear terms alone.


In this scenario, since all eigenvalues are purely imaginary, Theorem 6.4 indicates that no direct conclusion about the stability can be made, demonstrating the central role eigenvalues play in system stability analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the initial value problem \(y^{\prime \prime}+y^{2}=t, y(0)=y_{0}, y^{\prime}(0)=y_{0}^{\prime} .\) Can Laplace transforms be used to solve this initial value problem? Explain your answer.

In each exercise, locate all equilibrium points for the given autonomous system. Determine whether the equilibrium point or points are asymptotically stable, stable but not asymptotically stable, or unstable. $$ \frac{d}{d t}\left[\begin{array}{l} y_{1} \\ y_{2} \\ y_{3} \\ y_{4} \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{rrrr} -3 & -5 & 0 & 0 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 & 0 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{l} y_{1} \\ y_{2} \\ y_{3} \\ y_{4} \end{array}\right] $$

Consider the linear system $$ \mathbf{y}^{\prime}=\left[\begin{array}{cc} -1 & \alpha \\ \alpha & -1 \end{array}\right] \mathbf{y} $$ where \(\alpha\) is a real constant. (a) What information can be obtained about the eigenvalues of the coefficient matrix simply by examining its structure? (b) For what value(s) of the constant \(\alpha\) is the equilibrium point \(\mathbf{y}_{e}=\mathbf{0}\) an isolated equilibrium point? For what value(s) of the constant \(\alpha\) is the equilibrium point \(\mathbf{y}_{e}=\mathbf{0}\) not isolated? (c) In the case where \(\mathbf{y}_{e}=\mathbf{0}\) is not an isolated equilibrium point, what is the equation of the phase-plane line of equilibrium points? (d) Is it possible in this example for \(\mathbf{y}_{e}=\mathbf{0}\) to be an isolated equilibrium point that is stable but not asymptotically stable? Explain. (e) For what values of the constant \(\alpha\), if any, is the equilibrium point \(\mathbf{y}_{e}=\mathbf{0}\) an isolated asymptotically stable equilibrium point? For what values of the constant \(\alpha\), if any, is the equilibrium point \(\mathbf{y}_{e}=\mathbf{0}\) an unstable equilibrium point?

In each exercise, (a) Rewrite the given \(n\)th order scalar initial value problem as \(\mathbf{y}^{\prime}=\mathbf{f}(t, \mathbf{y}), \mathbf{y}\left(t_{0}\right)=\mathbf{y}_{0}\), by defining \(y_{1}(t)=y(t), y_{2}(t)=y^{\prime}(t), \ldots, y_{n}(t)=y^{(n-1)}(t)\) and defining \(y_{1}(t)=y(t), y_{2}(t)=y(t), \ldots, y_{n}(t)=y^{\prime(n-t)}(t)\) \(\mathbf{y}(t)=\left[\begin{array}{c}y_{1}(t) \\ y_{2}(t) \\ \vdots \\\ y_{n}(t)\end{array}\right]\) (b) Compute the \(n^{2}\) partial derivatives \(\partial f_{i}\left(t, y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\right) / \partial y_{j}, i, j=1, \ldots, n\). (c) For the system obtained in part (a), determine where in \((n+1)\)-dimensional \(t \mathbf{y}\)-space the hypotheses of Theorem \(6.1\) are not satisfied. In other words, at what points \(\left(t, y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\right)\), if any, does at least one component function \(f_{i}\left(t, y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\right)\) and/or at least one partial derivative function \(\partial f_{i}\left(t, y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\right) / \partial y_{i}, i, j=1, \ldots, n\) fail to be continuous? What is the largest open rectangular region \(R\) where the hypotheses of Theorem \(6.1\) hold? $$ y^{\prime \prime}+t y^{\prime}+2 y=0, \quad y(0)=1, \quad y^{\prime}(0)=2 $$

Consider the system \(x^{\prime}=y+\alpha x\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right), y^{\prime}=-x+\alpha y\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) .\) Introduce polar coordinates and use the results of Exercises 25 and 26 to derive differential equations for \(r(t)\) and \(\theta(t)\). Solve these differential equations, and then form \(x(t)\) and \(y(t)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free