Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

These exercises explore some additional aspects of the radiative transport model presented in Section 11.1. A Reflection Coefficient Riccati Equation In this exercise, we convert the radiative transport linear two-point boundary value problem into a scalar nonlinear initial value problem (more properly, a final value problem) for a reflection coefficient that we will define. The scalar differential equation is called a Riccati equation (see Section 2.6). Consider again the boundary value problem solved in Example 4: $$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{d}{d x}\left[\begin{array}{l} I^{(+)} \\ I^{(-)} \end{array}\right]=\beta\left[\begin{array}{cc} -1 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{l} I^{(+)} \\ I^{(-)} \end{array}\right], \quad 0

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Derive a Riccati equation for the reflection coefficient \(R(x) = I^{(-)}(x) / I^{(+)}(x)\) and solve it. Compare the solution with the quotient of the original boundary value problem's solution. Solution: The derived Riccati equation for the reflection coefficient \(R(x)\) is: $$ \frac{dR}{dx} = -\beta(R - 1)^2 $$ The solution for the Riccati equation is: $$ R(x) = 1 - \frac{1}{\beta(x - l + 1)} $$ Comparing with the quotient of the original problem's solution, \(I^{(-)}(x) / I^{(+)}(x) = \frac{e^{-2\beta x} - e^{-2\beta l}}{1 - e^{-2\beta l}}\), we find that the solution of the Riccati equation is consistent with the quotient of the original problem's solution.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a): Derive the Riccati Equation for R(x)

Given the boundary value problem: $$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{d}{dx}\left[\begin{array}{l} I^{(+)} \\ I^{(-)} \end{array}\right]=\beta\left[\begin{array}{cc} -1 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{l} I^{(+)} \\ I^{(-)} \end{array}\right], \quad 0<x<l \\ &I^{(+)}(0)=I^{\text {inc }}, \quad I^{(-)}(l)=0 \end{aligned} $$ Define the reflection coefficient \(R(x) = I^{(-)}(x) / I^{(+)}(x), 0 \leq x \leq l\). First, differentiate \(R(x)\) with respect to \(x\): $$ \frac{dR}{dx} = \frac{d(I^{(-)} / I^{(+)})}{dx} = \frac{I^{(-)'}I^{(+)} - I^{(-)}I^{(+)'}}{(I^{(+)})^2} $$ From the given boundary value problem, we have the equations: $$ I^{(+)'} = \beta(-I^{(+)} + I^{(-)}), \quad I^{(-)'} = \beta(-I^{(+)} + I^{(-)}) $$ Substitute these into the expression for \(dR/dx\): $$ \frac{dR}{dx} = \frac{\beta(-I^{(+)} + I^{(-)})I^{(+)} - I^{(-)}\beta(-I^{(+)} + I^{(-)})}{(I^{(+)})^2} $$ Now, divide both the numerator and denominator by \(I^{(-)}\), and replace \(I^{(-)} / I^{(+)}\) with \(R\): $$ \frac{dR}{dx} = \frac{\beta(-1 + R) - R\beta(-1 + R)}{R^2} = -\beta(R - 1)^2 $$ The initial condition for \(R(x)\) is given by \(R(l) = I^{(-)}(l) / I^{(+)}(l) = 0 / I^{(+)}(l) = 0\). Thus, the problem for the reflection coefficient \(R(x)\) is: $$ \begin{aligned} &R^{\prime}=-\beta(R-1)^{2}, \quad 0<x<l \\ &R(I)=0 \end{aligned} $$
02

Part (b): Solve Riccati equation and compare with the original solution

The Riccati equation for \(R(x)\) is separable: $$ \frac{dR}{(R - 1)^2} = -\beta dx $$ Integrate both sides with respect to \(x\): $$ \int\frac{dR}{(R - 1)^2} = -\beta\int dx \\ -\frac{1}{R - 1} = -\beta x + C $$ At \(x = l\), we have \(R(l) = 0\), so we can find the constant \(C\): $$ -\frac{1}{0 - 1} = -\beta l + C \\ C = \beta l - 1 $$ Now, we can write the solution for the Riccati equation in terms of \(x\): $$ -\frac{1}{R - 1}= -\beta x + \beta l - 1 \\ \frac{1}{1 - R} = \beta(x - l + 1) $$ From the solution of the original problem (Example 4), we have the quotient \(I^{(-)}(x) / I^{(+)}(x) = \frac{e^{-2\beta x} - e^{-2\beta l}}{1 - e^{-2\beta l}}\). Let's rewrite the expression for \(R(x)\): $$ 1 - R = \frac{1}{\beta(x - l + 1)} \\ R = 1 - \frac{1}{\beta(x - l + 1)} $$ Compare this with the quotient of \(I^{(-)}(x) / I^{(+)}(x)\) from Example 4: $$ R(x) = 1 - \frac{1}{\beta(x - l + 1)} = \frac{e^{-2\beta x} - e^{-2\beta l}}{1 - e^{-2\beta l}} $$ Thus, the solution of the Riccati equation is consistent with the quotient of the original problem's solution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Radiative Transport Model
The radiative transport model is a crucial concept in studying how radiation traverses through a medium, such as clouds or biological tissues. This model describes how radiation is emitted, absorbed, and scattered, focusing on the movement and interaction of photons with matter.
The goal is to predict the intensity and distribution of radiation as it moves through different materials. In many applications, it is important to understand these interactions to control or predict the outcome of processes, such as energy transfer or imaging techniques. Key aspects of the model include:
  • Emission: How radiation is emitted from a source within the medium.
  • Absorption: The process by which radiation's intensity decreases as it is absorbed by the medium.
  • Scattering: The deflection of radiation from its original path due to interactions with particles in the medium.
Understanding these processes allows for the development of mathematical models that can predict the behavior of radiation under various conditions.
Reflection Coefficient
The reflection coefficient, denoted as \( R(x) \), is a vital parameter when evaluating the behavior of radiation within a medium. It defines the ratio of reflected radiation to forward-propagating radiation at a given point \( x \) within the medium. By examining \( R(x) \), we can determine how much of the radiation is bouncing back as opposed to continuing forward.This coefficient is essential in designing systems that aim to minimize reflective losses or enhance reflectivity for specific applications, such as in solar panels or optical coatings.
Understanding the reflection coefficient involves:
  • Identifying boundary conditions where radiation is initially emitted or absorbed.
  • Deriving equations that relate \( R(x) \) to the medium's properties and conditions, such as the Riccati equation.
  • Analyzing how \( R(x) \) changes across the medium to control or exploit reflective behavior.
By studying these aspects, engineers and scientists can improve the efficiency of systems like photovoltaic cells or design effective thermal insulation materials.
Boundary Value Problem
A boundary value problem in mathematics refers to a differential equation (or a system of equations) coupled with a set of additional constraints, known as boundary conditions. In the context of the radiative transport model, it is critical in ensuring we solve for the behavior of radiation across its entire path through the medium. Boundary value problems involve:
  • Specifying values or conditions at the boundaries of the domain where the differential equation is defined, such as at the start and the end of a slab of material in the radiative model.
  • Ensuring the solution is consistent with these boundary constraints, which often represent physical properties or conservation laws.
  • Utilizing techniques like numerical methods or analytical solutions to find the function satisfying both the differential equation and the boundary conditions.
These problems are prevalent in engineering and physics because they often represent real-world conditions like temperature distribution in a rod or voltage across a circuit.
Separable Differential Equations
Separable differential equations are a class of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that can be rearranged into a form that allows for direct integration on both sides of the equation. This characteristic makes them more straightforward to solve compared to other ODEs that are not separable.To solve a separable differential equation, we follow these general steps:
  • Rewrite the equation in the form \( \frac{dy}{dx} = g(y)h(x) \).
  • Separate the variables, bringing all terms involving \( y \) to one side and all terms involving \( x \) to the other: \( g(y)dy = h(x)dx \).
  • Integrate both sides independently: \( \int g(y)dy = \int h(x)dx \).
  • Solve the resulting equations for \( y \) in terms of \( x \), as necessary.
In the context of the Riccati equation from the exercise, recognizing it as a separable differential equation simplifies the process of solving for the reflection coefficient. This technique is invaluable because it allows for the analytic or numerical solution of more complex systems, aiding in the practical application of theoretical models.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each exercise, (a) Recast the differential equation in the form \(L(u)=\left(p(x) u^{\prime}\right)^{\prime}-q(x) u=-\lambda r(x) u\) if it is not already in that form. Identify the functions \(p(x), q(x)\), and \(r(x)\). (b) Determine the eigenpairs. In those cases where an explicit formula for \(\lambda_{n}\) cannot be obtained, use computer graphing software and/or root- finding software to determine the first three eigenvalues. (c) Explicitly verify the orthogonality property possessed by eigenfunctions corresponding to distinct eigenvalues. $$ \begin{array}{ll} t u^{\prime \prime}=-\lambda u, & 0

Suppose it is known that the homogeneous two-point boundary value problem ( \(3 \mathrm{~b}\) ), $$ \begin{aligned} &z^{\prime \prime}+p(t) z^{\prime}+q(t) z=0, \quad a

In each exercise, convert the given problem into a corresponding boundary value problem for the Prufer variables \(R\) and \(\theta\); see equation (18). State both the differential equations and the boundary conditions. Assume \(R(a)\) and \(R(b)\) are nonzero. $$ \begin{aligned} &u^{\prime \prime}-2 x u^{\prime}+u=-\lambda u, \quad 0

Show that the two-point boundary value problem has a unique solution, and find it: $$ \mathbf{y}^{\prime}=\left[\begin{array}{rrr} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 \end{array}\right] \mathbf{y}, \quad y_{1}(0)=1, \quad y_{2}(0)=0, \quad y_{3}(1)=1 $$

In each exercise, (a) Can you use Theorem \(11.2\) or Theorem \(11.3\) to decide whether the given boundary value problem has a unique solution? (b) If your answer to part (a) is yes, find the unique solution. (c) If your answer to part (a) is no, use the Fredholm alternative theorem to decide whether the given boundary value problem has a unique solution. (d) If the Fredholm alternative theorem indicates there is a unique solution of the given boundary value problem, find that solution. (e) If the Fredholm alternative theorem indicates the given boundary value problem has either infinitely many solutions or no solution, find all the solutions or state that there are none. $$ \begin{aligned} &y^{\prime \prime}+y=2 \\ &y(0)+y^{\prime}(0)=7 \\ &y(\pi)+y^{\prime}(\pi)=3 \end{aligned} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free