Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If \(x_{1}=y\) and \(x_{2}=y^{\prime}\), then the second order equation $$ y^{\prime \prime}+p(t) y^{\prime}+q(t) y=0 $$ corresponds to the system $$ \begin{aligned} x_{1}^{\prime} &=x_{2} \\ x_{2}^{\prime} &=-q(t) x_{1}-p(t) x_{2} \end{aligned} $$ Show that if \(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}\) and \(\mathbf{x}^{(2)}\) are a fundamental set of solutions of Eqs. (ii), and if \(y^{(1)}\) and \(y^{(2)}\) are a fundamental set of solutions of Eq. (i), then \(W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right]=c W\left[\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}\right],\) where \(c\) is a nonzero constant. Hint: \(y^{(1)}(t)\) and \(y^{(2)}(t)\) must be linear combinations of \(x_{11}(t)\) and \(x_{12}(t)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Show that the Wronskian of the second-order equation \(y^{\prime \prime}+p(t) y^{\prime}+q(t) y=0\) is equal to a nonzero constant times the Wronskian of the system \(\begin{aligned} x_{1}^{\prime} &= x_{2} \\ x_{2}^{\prime} &=-q(t) x_{1}-p(t) x_{2} \end{aligned}\), given that \(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}\) and \(\mathbf{x}^{(2)}\) are a fundamental set of solutions of the system, and \(y^{(1)}\) and \(y^{(2)}\) are a fundamental set of solutions of the second-order equation.

Step by step solution

01

Expressing y^{(1)} and y^{(2)} as linear combinations of x_{11} and x_{12}

According to the hint, we can write \(y^{(1)}(t)\) and \(y^{(2)}(t)\) as linear combinations of \(x_{11}(t)\) and \(x_{12}(t)\): $$ \begin{aligned} y^{(1)}(t) &= a_{1} x_{11}(t) + a_{2} x_{12}(t) \\ y^{(2)}(t) &= b_{1} x_{11}(t) + b_{2} x_{12}(t) \end{aligned} $$ where \(a_1, a_2, b_1,\) and \(b_2\) are constants.
02

Finding the Wronskians of the second-order equation and the system

Now, let's find the Wronskian for the second-order equation, \(W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right]\), which is given by: $$ W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right] = \begin{vmatrix} y^{(1)} & y^{(2)} \\ y^{(1) \prime} & y^{(2) \prime} \end{vmatrix}= y^{(1)}y^{(2) \prime} - y^{(1) \prime} y^{(2)} $$ Similarly, we find the Wronskian for the system, \(W\left[\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}\right]\), as: $$ W\left[\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}\right] = \begin{vmatrix} x_{11} & x_{12} \\ x_{21} & x_{22} \end{vmatrix}= x_{11}x_{22} - x_{21}x_{12} $$
03

Relating the Wronskians

Now, we need to show that the Wronskians are related by the equation \(W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right]=c W\left[\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}\right]\), where \(c\) is a nonzero constant. We express the Wronskian for the second-order equation in terms of \(x_{11}\) and \(x_{12}\) using the linear combinations derived in Step 1: $$ W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right] = (a_{1}x_{11} + a_{2}x_{12})(b_{1}x_{22} - b_{2}x_{21}) - (a_{1}x_{21} + a_{2}x_{22})(b_{1}x_{11} - b_{2}x_{12}) $$ $$ W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right] = a_{1}b_{1}(x_{11}x_{22} - x_{21}x_{12}) $$ Now we can see that \(W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right]\) is equal to the Wronskian of the system, \(W\left[\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}\right]\), times the constant \(c=a_{1}b_{1}\), and since \(a_1\) and \(b_1\) are constants, \(c\) is a nonzero constant. Therefore, the relationship between the Wronskians is proven: $$ W\left[y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}\right]=c W\left[\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}\right] $$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Second-Order Linear Equations
Second-order linear equations are differential equations of the form \(y'' + p(t)y' + q(t)y = 0 \). These equations involve the second derivative of an unknown function \(y\) with respect to a variable \(t\), as well as its first derivative and the function itself. A typical example would be found in physics, such as the damped harmonic oscillator equation.

Understanding and solving second-order linear equations is crucial because they describe a wide range of phenomena in science and engineering. Key properties of these equations include their linearity and constant coefficients, which allow us to apply superposition principles in finding their solutions.

One method of solving such equations involves the use of a system of first-order linear equations, which can simplify the analysis and solution process. By translating a second-order equation into a system, we can use powerful mathematical tools like matrix theory and the Wronskian to find solutions.
Wronskian
The Wronskian is a determinant used in the theory of differential equations to determine whether a set of solutions is linearly independent. For two functions, \(y^{(1)}\) and \(y^{(2)}\), the Wronskian is defined as:

\[ W(y^{(1)}, y^{(2)}) = y^{(1)}y^{(2)\prime} - y^{(1)\prime} y^{(2)} \]

This can be extended to more functions by using appropriately larger determinants. The Wronskian is vital because if it is nonzero at some point, it indicates that the functions \(y^{(1)}\) and \(y^{(2)}\) are linearly independent over some interval. Linear independence is crucial for forming a fundamental set of solutions to differential equations.

In the context of the original exercise, the Wronskian relates to both the second-order differential equation and the corresponding first-order system. Demonstrating the relationship between these Wronskians shows the equivalence of solutions across both representations of the problem.
Fundamental Set of Solutions
A fundamental set of solutions is a collection of solutions to a differential equation that forms a basis for the solution space of that equation. This means that any solution to the differential equation can be expressed as a linear combination of the solutions in the fundamental set.

For a second-order linear differential equation like \(y'' + p(t)y' + q(t)y = 0 \), a fundamental set of solutions would typically consist of two linearly independent solutions. The general solution can be written as \(c_1 y^{(1)}(t) + c_2 y^{(2)}(t)\), where \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) are constants.

In the exercise, the task is to show that solutions to a system of first-order equations can also form a fundamental set for the original second-order problem. This involves expressing the solutions of the original differential equation in terms of solutions from the derived system, thus providing a deep connection between different representations of differential problems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In this problem we indicate how to show that \(\mathbf{u}(t)\) and \(\mathbf{v}(t)\), as given by Eqs. (9), are linearly independent. Let \(r_{1}=\lambda+i \mu\) and \(\bar{r}_{1}=\lambda-i \mu\) be a pair of conjugate eigenvalues of the coefficient matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) of \(\mathrm{Fq}(1)\); let \(\xi^{(1)}=\mathbf{a}+i \mathbf{b}\) and \(\bar{\xi}^{(1)}=\mathbf{a}-i \mathbf{b}\) be the corresponding eigenvectors. Recall that it was stated in Section 7.3 that if \(r_{1} \neq \bar{r}_{1},\) then \(\boldsymbol{\xi}^{(1)}\) and \(\bar{\xi}^{(1)}\) are linearly independent. (a) First we show that a and b are linearly independent. Consider the equation \(c_{1} \mathrm{a}+\) \(c_{2} \mathrm{b}=0 .\) Express a and \(\mathrm{b}\) in terms of \(\xi^{(1)}\) and \(\bar{\xi}^{(1)},\) and then show that \(\left(c_{1}-i c_{2}\right) \xi^{(1)}+\) \(\left(c_{1}+i c_{2}\right) \bar{\xi}^{(1)}=0\) (b) Show that \(c_{1}-i c_{2}=0\) and \(c_{1}+i c_{2}=0\) and then that \(c_{1}=0\) and \(c_{2}=0 .\) Consequently, a and b are linearly independent. (c) To show that \(\mathbf{u}(t)\) and \(\mathbf{v}(t)\) are linearly independent consider the equation \(c_{1} \mathbf{u}\left(t_{0}\right)+\) \(c_{2} \mathbf{v}\left(t_{0}\right)=\mathbf{0}\), where \(t_{0}\) is an arbitrary point. Rewrite this equation in terms of a and \(\mathbf{b}\), and then proceed as in part (b) to show that \(c_{1}=0\) and \(c_{2}=0 .\) Hence \(\mathbf{u}(t)\) and \(\mathbf{v}(t)\) are linearly independent at the arbitrary point \(t_{0}\). Therefore they are linearly independent at every point and on every interval.

Deal with the problem of solving \(\mathbf{A x}=\mathbf{b}\) when \(\operatorname{det} \mathbf{A}=0\) Suppose that det \(\mathbf{A}=0\) and that \(y\) is a solution of \(\mathbf{A}^{*} \mathbf{y}=\mathbf{0} .\) Show that if \((\mathbf{b}, \mathbf{y})=0\) for every such \(\mathbf{y},\) then \(\mathbf{A} \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\) has solutions. Note that the converse of Problem \(27 ;\) the form of the solution is given by Problem \(28 .\)

Let \(\Phi(t)\) denote the fundamental matrix satisfying \(\Phi^{\prime}=A \Phi, \Phi(0)=L\) In the text we also denoted this matrix by \(\exp (A t)\), In this problem we show that \(\Phi\) does indeed have the principal algebraic properties associated with the exponential function. (a) Show that \(\Phi(t) \Phi(s)=\Phi(t+s) ;\) that is, \(\exp (\hat{\mathbf{A}} t) \exp (\mathbf{A} s)=\exp [\mathbf{A}(t+s)]\) Hint: Show that if \(s\) is fixed and \(t\) is variable, then both \(\Phi(t) \Phi(s)\) and \(\Phi(t+s)\) satisfy the initial value problem \(\mathbf{Z}^{\prime}=\mathbf{A} \mathbf{Z}, \mathbf{Z}(0)=\mathbf{\Phi}(s)\) (b) Show that \(\Phi(t) \Phi(-t)=\mathbf{I}\); that is, exp(At) \(\exp [\mathbf{A}(-t)]=\mathbf{1}\). Then show that \(\Phi(-t)=\) \(\mathbf{\Phi}^{-1}(t) .\) (c) Show that \(\mathbf{\Phi}(t-s)=\mathbf{\Phi}(t) \mathbf{\Phi}^{-1}(s)\)

The electric circuit shown in Figure 7.6 .6 is described by the system of differential equations \(\frac{d}{d t}\left(\begin{array}{l}{I} \\\ {V}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{cc}{0} & {\frac{1}{L}} \\\ {-\frac{1}{C}} & {-\frac{1}{R C}}\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{l}{I} \\\ {V}\end{array}\right)\) where \(I\) is the current through the inductor and \(V\) is the voltage drop across the capacitor. These differential equations were derived in Problem 18 of Section \(7.1 .\) (a) Show that the eigenvalues of the coefficient matrix are real and different if \(L>4 R^{2} C\); show they are complex conjugates if \(L<4 R^{2} C .\) (b) Suppose that \(R=1\) ohm, \(C=\frac{1}{2}\) farad, and \(L=1\) henry. Find the general solution of the system (i) in this case. (c) Find \(I(t)\) and \(V(t)\) if \(I(0)=2\) amperes and \(V(0)=1\) volt (d) For the circuit of part (b) determine the limiting values of \(I(t)\) and \(V(t)\) as \(t \rightarrow \infty\) Do these limiting values depend on the initial conditions?

Find the general solution of the given system of equations. $$ \mathbf{x}^{\prime}=\left(\begin{array}{ll}{2} & {-5} \\ {1} & {-2}\end{array}\right) \mathbf{x}+\left(\begin{array}{c}{0} \\ {\cos t}\end{array}\right), \quad 0

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free