Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Find the inverse Laplace transform of the given function. $$ \frac{2 s-3}{s^{2}-4} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
\) Answer: The inverse Laplace transform of the given function is \(\frac{7}{4} e^{-2t} + \frac{1}{4} e^{2t}\).

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Apply Partial Fraction Decomposition

To find the inverse Laplace transform, we first need to decompose the given function into simpler fractions. Given function: $$ \frac{2s-3}{s^2-4} $$ Since the denominator is a quadratic equation, we can rewrite it as: $$ \frac{2s-3}{(s+2)(s-2)} = \frac{A}{s+2} + \frac{B}{s-2} $$
02

Solve for A and B

To find the values of A and B, we can multiply both sides of the equation by \((s+2)(s-2)\) and use the properties of equal fractions. $$ (2s-3)= A(s-2) + B(s+2) $$ Now, we will solve for A and B: 1. Solve for A: Let \(s=-2\): $$ (-2 * 2) - 3 = -7 = A(-4) \Rightarrow A = \frac{7}{4} $$ 2. Solve for B: Let \(s=2\): $$ (2 * 2) - 3 = 1 = B(4) \Rightarrow B = \frac{1}{4} $$ Hence, the partial fraction decomposition is: $$ \frac{7}{4 (s+2)} + \frac{1}{4 (s-2)} $$
03

Find the Inverse Laplace Transform

Now, we can find the inverse Laplace transform for each term and sum them to find the final solution. 1. Inverse Laplace transform of the first term: $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{7}{4(s+2)}\right\} = \frac{7}{4} e^{-2t} $$ 2. Inverse Laplace transform of the second term: $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{4(s-2)}\right\} = \frac{1}{4} e^{2t} $$ Summing both inverse Laplace transforms, we get the solution: $$ \frac{7}{4} e^{-2t} + \frac{1}{4} e^{2t} $$ So, the inverse Laplace transform of the given function is: $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{2s-3}{s^2-4}\right\} = \frac{7}{4} e^{-2t} + \frac{1}{4} e^{2t} $$

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Partial Fraction Decomposition
Partial fraction decomposition is a method used in calculus to break down complex rational expressions into simpler ones that are easier to integrate or transform. It’s particularly useful when dealing with Laplace transforms, where breaking down a fraction into parts makes finding the inverse transform more manageable.

At its core, partial fraction decomposition involves expressing a fraction whose numerator and denominator are polynomials as a sum of simpler fractions, each with a simpler denominator. This process usually follows a few steps:
  • Factoring the denominator into simpler polynomials, if possible.
  • Writing out a sum of fractions corresponding to these factors, with unknown constants in the numerators.
  • Figuring out these unknown constants by multiplying both sides by the factored denominator and comparing coefficients or by substituting convenient values for the variable.

Once the partial fractions are determined, each one can be inverted separately if working with Laplace transforms, ultimately simplifying the process of finding the inverse Laplace transform.
Laplace Transform Properties
The Laplace transform is a powerful tool used to solve differential equations by transforming them into algebraic equations, which are usually easier to solve. It transforms a function of time, often a physical signal or system response, into a function of complex frequency.

Understanding the properties of the Laplace transform is essential for effectively using it to analyze systems and signals. Some key properties include:
  • Linearity: The transform of a sum of functions is the sum of their Laplace transforms.
  • First and Second Shifting Theorems: These allow for the transformation of functions multiplied by an exponential term, which is common in solving inverse Laplace transforms.
  • Convolution Theorem: This facilitates the calculation of the inverse Laplace transform of the product of two Laplace transforms, relating to the convolution of the original time functions.
  • Initial and Final Value Theorems: These provide a way to determine the initial and final values of a function given its Laplace transform without having to calculate the entire inverse transform.

These properties are particularly useful when practicing partial fraction decomposition. In the context of our exercise, for instance, the shifting theorems apply directly to the exponential functions in the final solution.
Exponential Functions
Exponential functions play a crucial role in many areas of mathematics, including the study of Laplace transforms. In the context of Laplace transforms, they emerge naturally as solutions to differential equations and appear as part of inverse Laplace transforms.

An exponential function can generally be written as \( e^{at} \), where \( a \) is a constant. The sign of \( a \) affects the function's behavior:
  • If \( a > 0 \), the function grows exponentially as \( t \) increases.
  • If \( a = 0 \), the function is constant, equivalently \( e^{0} = 1 \).
  • If \( a < 0 \), the function decays exponentially as \( t \) increases.

In the solution of our exercise, we find two exponential terms - \( \frac{7}{4} e^{-2t} \) and \( \frac{1}{4} e^{2t} \). The first is a decaying exponential because the exponent -2t is negative, indicative of a response that decreases over time. The second is a growing exponential since its exponent 2t is positive, pointing to a quantity that increases over time.

Understanding exponential functions is vital for mastering inverse Laplace transforms, as these functions are often present in the transformed solutions of linear time-invariant systems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Tautochrone. A problem of interest in the history of mathematics is that of finding the tautochrone-the curve down which a particle will slide freely under gravity alone, reaching the bottom in the same time regardless of its starting point on the curve. This problem arose in the construction of a clock pendulum whose period is independent of the amplitude of its motion. The tautochrone was found by Christian Huygens \((1629-\) \(1695)\) in 1673 by geometrical methods, and later by Leibniz and Jakob Bernoulli using analytical arguments. Bernoulli's solution (in \(1690)\) was one of the first occasions on which a differential equation was explicitly solved. The Tautochrone. A problem of interest in the history of mathematics is that of finding the tautochrone-the curve down which a particle will slide freely under gravity alone, reaching the bottom in the same time regardless of its starting point on the curve. This problem arose in the construction of a clock pendulum whose period is independent of the amplitude of its motion. The tautochrone was found by Christian Huygens \((1629-\) \(1695)\) in 1673 by geometrical methods, and later by Leibniz and Jakob Bernoulli using analytical arguments. Bernoulli's solution (in \(1690)\) was one of the first occasions on which a differential equation was explicitly solved. The geometrical configuration is shown in Figure \(6.6 .2 .\) The starting point \(P(a, b)\) is joined to the terminal point \((0,0)\) by the arc \(C .\) Arc length \(s\) is measured from the origin, and \(f(y)\) denotes the rate of change of \(s\) with respect to \(y:\) $$ f(y)=\frac{d s}{d y}=\left[1+\left(\frac{d x}{d y}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2} $$ Then it follows from the principle of conservation of energy that the time \(T(b)\) required for a particle to slide from \(P\) to the origin is $$ T(b)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 g}} \int_{0}^{b} \frac{f(y)}{\sqrt{b-y}} d y $$

Use the Laplace transform to solve the given initial value problem. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\omega^{2} y=\cos 2 t, \quad \omega^{2} \neq 4 ; \quad y(0)=1, \quad y^{\prime}(0)=0 $$

Consider Bessel's equation of order zero $$ t y^{\prime \prime}+y^{\prime}+t y=0 $$ Recall from Section 5.4 that \(t=0\) is a regular singular point for this equation, and therefore solutions may become unbounded as \(t \rightarrow 0\). However, let us try to determine whether there are any solutions that remain finite at \(t=0\) and have finite derivatives there. Assuming that there is such a solution \(y=\phi(t),\) let \(Y(s)=\mathcal{L}\\{\phi(t)\\} .\) (a) Show that \(Y(s)\) satisfies $$ \left(1+s^{2}\right) Y^{\prime}(s)+s Y(s)=0 $$ (b) Show that \(Y(s)=c\left(1+s^{2}\right)^{-1 / 2},\) where \(c\) is an arbitrary constant. (c) Expanding \(\left(1+s^{2}\right)^{-1 / 2}\) in a binomial series valid for \(s>1\) assuming that it is permissible to take the inverse transform term by term, show that $$ y=c \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n} t^{2 n}}{2^{2 n}(n !)^{2}}=c J_{0}(t) $$ where \(J_{0}\) is the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero. Note that \(J_{0}(0)=1\), and that solution of this equation becomes unbounded as \(t \rightarrow 0 .\)

Use the Laplace transform to solve the given initial value problem. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+3 y^{\prime}+2 y=0 ; \quad y(0)=1, \quad y^{\prime}(0)=0 $$

Recall that \(\cosh b t=\left(e^{b t}+e^{-b t}\right) / 2\) and \(\sinh b t=\left(e^{b t}-e^{-b t}\right) / 2 .\) In each of Problems 7 through 10 find the Laplace transform of the given function; \(a\) and \(b\) are real constants. $$ e^{a t} \sinh b t $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free