Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Find the inverse Laplace transform of the given function. $$ \frac{3 s}{s^{2}-s-6} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The inverse Laplace transform of the function \(\frac{3s}{s^2 - s - 6}\) is \(\frac{6}{5}e^{-2t}+\frac{9}{5}e^{3t}\).

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Perform Partial Fraction Decomposition

First, we need to factor the denominator of the given function: $$ s^{2} - s - 6 = (s+2)(s-3) $$ Now, we can perform partial fraction decomposition on the given function: $$ \frac{3s}{(s+2)(s-3)} = \frac{A}{s+2} + \frac{B}{s-3} $$ To find the constants A and B, we can clear the fractions by multiplying both sides of the equation by \((s+2)(s-3)\): $$ 3s = A(s-3) + B(s+2) $$
02

Solve for the Constants A and B

Now we need to find the values of A and B. We can do this by solving the equation \(3s = A(s-3) + B(s+2)\) for different values of s. To find A, we can let s = 3: $$ 3(3) = A(3-3) + B(3+2) \\ 9 = 5B \\ B = \frac{9}{5} $$ To find B, we can let s = -2: $$ 3(-2) = A(-2-3) + B(-2+3) \\ -6 = -5A \\ A = \frac{6}{5} $$
03

Rewrite the Function with A and B

Now that we have the values of A and B, we can rewrite the function as: $$ \frac{3s}{(s+2)(s-3)} = \frac{\frac{6}{5}}{s+2} + \frac{\frac{9}{5}}{s-3} $$
04

Use Laplace Transform Table to Find Inverse Laplace Transform

Now we can use the Laplace transform table to find the inverse Laplace transform of each term: $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1} \left\{\frac{\frac{6}{5}}{s+2}\right\} = \frac{6}{5} \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{s+2}\right\} = \frac{6}{5} e^{-2t} \\ \mathcal{L}^{-1} \left\{\frac{\frac{9}{5}}{s-3}\right\} = \frac{9}{5} \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{s-3}\right\} = \frac{9}{5} e^{3t} $$ Finally, we can sum the two transformed terms to find the inverse Laplace transform of the original function: $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{3s}{(s+2)(s-3)}\right\} = \frac{6}{5} e^{-2t} + \frac{9}{5} e^{3t} $$ So the inverse Laplace transform of the given function is: $$ \frac{6}{5} e^{-2t} + \frac{9}{5} e^{3t} $$

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Partial Fraction Decomposition
When working with complex rational functions, particularly when trying to find their inverse Laplace transforms, partial fraction decomposition is an invaluable tool. This technique involves breaking down a complex fraction into simpler components called 'partial fractions,' which can be more easily transformed or integrated.

The process starts with factorizing the denominator of the original function. Once the denominator is factorized, the fraction is expressed as a sum of terms where each term has one of the factors in its denominator and an unknown constant in its numerator. These constants are what we seek to determine in order to complete the decomposition.

Solving this set-up usually requires setting up an equation by multiplying both sides by the denominator, thus clearing the fractions. You then solve for the unknown constants by substituting strategic values for the variable that simplify the equation or by equating coefficients of like terms. In our example, we substituted the roots of the denominator to quickly find the constants.

The correctly decomposed form enables easier computation when dealing with integral transforms like the Laplace transform, and is crucial for handling more complex differential equations.
Laplace Transform Table
A Laplace transform table is an indispensable reference in the realm of differential equations and control systems, listing many transforms of common functions. The table allows us to directly obtain the Laplace transform or its inverse without going through the laborious process of integration that defines the Laplace transform.

For each entry in the table, there is a function in the time domain and its counterpart in the Laplace or frequency domain. For instance, the exponential function \(e^{at}\) has a Laplace transform of \(\frac{1}{s-a}\) if we're looking at the unilateral transform.

Once we've decomposed a function using partial fractions, these tables allow us to write down the inverse transforms from memory or by quick reference, rather than performing complex integrations. With the constants A and B identified, and the corresponding standard forms located in the table, we can precisely map our function back to the time domain, simplifying our solution considerably.
Solving Linear Equations
Linear equations form the backbone of a wide range of mathematical problems, including the process of finding constants in partial fraction decomposition. These equations, which can represent lines in two-dimensional space, are vital in describing relationships where each term is either a constant or the product of a constant and a single variable.

To solve linear equations, one might isolate the variable or equate coefficients from both sides of the equation. This commonly involves addition, subtraction, multiplication or division to manipulate the equation into a more manageable form. In the context of our example with partial fraction decomposition, we strategically choosen values for the variable that simplify the equation, allowing for the straightforward isolation of our unknown constants.

The knowledge of solving linear equations is fundamental. It allows students to progress into more complex areas such as calculus, linear algebra, and beyond, and is practiced frequently in engineering fields, where systems are often modeled or controlled using linear relationships.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Concerned with differentiation of the Laplace transform. Let $$ F(s)=\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-s i} f(t) d t $$ It is possible to show that as long as \(f\) satisfics the conditions of Theorem \(6.1 .2,\) it is legitimate to differentiate under the integral sign with respect to the parameter \(s\) when \(s>a .\) (a) Show that \(F^{\prime}(s)=\mathcal{L}\\{-l f(t)\\}\) (b) Show that \(F^{(n)}(s)=\mathcal{L}\left\\{(-t)^{n} f(t)\right\\} ;\) hence differentiating the Laplace transform corresponds to multiplying the original function by \(-t .\)

Suppose that \(F(s)=\mathcal{L}\\{f(t)\\}\) exists for \(s>a \geq 0\) (a) Show that if \(c\) is a positive constant, then $$ \mathcal{L}\\{f(c t)\\}=\frac{1}{c} F\left(\frac{s}{c}\right), \quad s>c a $$ (b) Show that if \(k\) is a positive constant, then $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}\\{F(k s)\\}=\frac{1}{k} f\left(\frac{t}{k}\right) $$ (c) Show that if \(a\) and \(b\) are constants with \(a>0,\) then $$ \mathcal{L}^{-1}\\{F(a s+b)\\}=\frac{1}{a} e^{-b / d} f\left(\frac{t}{a}\right) $$

Use the result of Problem 28 to find the Laplace transform of the given function; \(a\) and \(b\) are real numbers and \(n\) is a positive integer. $$ t e^{a t} \cos b t $$

The Tautochrone. A problem of interest in the history of mathematics is that of finding the tautochrone-the curve down which a particle will slide freely under gravity alone, reaching the bottom in the same time regardless of its starting point on the curve. This problem arose in the construction of a clock pendulum whose period is independent of the amplitude of its motion. The tautochrone was found by Christian Huygens \((1629-\) \(1695)\) in 1673 by geometrical methods, and later by Leibniz and Jakob Bernoulli using analytical arguments. Bernoulli's solution (in \(1690)\) was one of the first occasions on which a differential equation was explicitly solved. The Tautochrone. A problem of interest in the history of mathematics is that of finding the tautochrone-the curve down which a particle will slide freely under gravity alone, reaching the bottom in the same time regardless of its starting point on the curve. This problem arose in the construction of a clock pendulum whose period is independent of the amplitude of its motion. The tautochrone was found by Christian Huygens \((1629-\) \(1695)\) in 1673 by geometrical methods, and later by Leibniz and Jakob Bernoulli using analytical arguments. Bernoulli's solution (in \(1690)\) was one of the first occasions on which a differential equation was explicitly solved. The geometrical configuration is shown in Figure \(6.6 .2 .\) The starting point \(P(a, b)\) is joined to the terminal point \((0,0)\) by the arc \(C .\) Arc length \(s\) is measured from the origin, and \(f(y)\) denotes the rate of change of \(s\) with respect to \(y:\) $$ f(y)=\frac{d s}{d y}=\left[1+\left(\frac{d x}{d y}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2} $$ Then it follows from the principle of conservation of energy that the time \(T(b)\) required for a particle to slide from \(P\) to the origin is $$ T(b)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 g}} \int_{0}^{b} \frac{f(y)}{\sqrt{b-y}} d y $$

Recall that \(\cosh b t=\left(e^{b t}+e^{-b t}\right) / 2\) and \(\sinh b t=\left(e^{b t}-e^{-b t}\right) / 2 .\) In each of Problems 7 through 10 find the Laplace transform of the given function; \(a\) and \(b\) are real constants. $$ e^{a t} \cosh b t $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free