Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that if \(L[y]=x^{2} y^{\prime \prime}+\alpha x y^{\prime}+\beta y,\) then $$ L\left[(-x)^{r}\right]=(-x)^{r} F(r) $$ for all \(x<0,\) where \(F(r)=r(r-1)+\alpha r+\beta .\) Hence conclude that if \(r_{1} \neq r_{2}\) are roots of \(F(r)=0,\) then linearly independent solutions of \(L[y]=0\) for \(x<0\) are \((-x)^{r_{1}}\) and \((-x)^{r_{2}}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Show that if \(L[(-x)^r] = (-x)^r F(r)\), where the linear second-order homogeneous differential operator \(L[y] = x^2 y'' + \alpha x y' + \beta y\), then two functions \((-x)^{r_1}\) and \((-x)^{r_2}\) are linearly independent solutions for \(x<0\), where \(r_1\) and \(r_2\) are distinct roots. Solution: Let \(F(r)=r(r-1)+\alpha r+\beta\). Then, when \(F(r_1)=0\) and \(F(r_2)=0\), we have two linearly independent solutions \((-x)^{r_1}\) and \((-x)^{r_2}\) for the equation \(L[y]=0\) for \(x<0\) as their Wronskian determinant is non-zero.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Derive \((-x)^r\) and \((-x)^r\)

Firstly, we need to find the first and second derivatives of the function \((-x)^r\) with respect to \(x\). Using the chain rule, we find: $$ \frac{d}{dx}\left[(-x)^r\right] = r(-x)^{r-1}(-1), $$ and, $$ \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\left[(-x)^r\right] = r(r-1)(-x)^{r-2}(-1)^2. $$
02

Plug the derivatives into \(L[y]\)

We now plug these derivatives into the given equation for \(L[y]\), which is: $$ L[y] = x^2 y'' + \alpha x y' + \beta y. $$ Substituting the derivatives, we get: $$ L[(-x)^r] = x^2 r(r-1)(-x)^{r-2}(-1)^2 + \alpha x r(-x)^{r-1}(-1) + \beta(-x)^r. $$
03

Simplify the expression

Now, we simplify the expression as follows: $$ L[(-x)^r] = (-x)^r (r(r-1) + \alpha r + \beta). $$ Comparing this to the given result, $$ (-x)^r F(r) = L[(-x)^r], $$ where \(F(r) = r(r-1) + \alpha r + \beta\).
04

Determine the roots of \(F(r)=0\)

To find the roots \(r_1\) and \(r_2\), we need to solve the equation \(F(r) = 0\). This gives us: $$ r(r-1) + \alpha r + \beta = 0. $$
05

Verify linearly independent solutions

If \(r_1\) and \(r_2\) are distinct roots of \(F(r) = 0\), then the functions \((-x)^{r_1}\) and \((-x)^{r_2}\) are solutions of the equation \(L[y]=0\). To show that they are linearly independent for \(x<0\), we will use the Wronskian determinant. The Wronskian determinant for these two functions is: $$ W\left((-x)^{r_1}, (-x)^{r_2}\right) = \begin{vmatrix} (-x)^{r_1} & (-x)^{r_2} \\ r_1(-x)^{r_1 - 1}(-1) & r_2(-x)^{r_2-1}(-1) \end{vmatrix} $$ Upon evaluating the determinant, we get: $$ W\left((-x)^{r_1}, (-x)^{r_2}\right) = r_1(-x)^{r_1 - 1}(-x)^{r_2} - r_2(-x)^{r_1}(-x)^{r_2-1}, $$ $$ W\left((-x)^{r_1}, (-x)^{r_2}\right) = (-x)^{r_1 + r_2 - 1}(r_1 - r_2). $$ Since \(r_1\) and \(r_2\) are distinct, \(r_1 - r_2 \neq 0\), and \(W((-x)^{r_1}, (-x)^{r_2}) \neq 0\) for \(x < 0\). This means that \((-x)^{r_1}\) and \((-x)^{r_2}\) are linearly independent solutions of \(L[y]=0\) for \(x < 0\).

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wronskian Determinant
The Wronskian determinant is a valuable tool in the study of differential equations, particularly for determining whether two functions are linearly independent. When you have two functions, say \( f(x) \) and \( g(x) \), their Wronskian is given by the determinant of the following matrix:
  • The first row contains the functions: \( f(x) \) and \( g(x) \),
  • The second row contains their derivatives: \( f'(x) \) and \( g'(x) \).
The Wronskian is then expressed as: \[ W(f,g) = \begin{vmatrix} f(x) & g(x) \ f'(x) & g'(x) \end{vmatrix} = f(x)g'(x) - g(x)f'(x). \] If the Wronskian of two functions does not equal zero in an interval, it suggests that these functions are linearly independent on that interval. This concept is crucial when analyzing solutions to differential equations since linear independence means that the functions form a complete set of solutions or a basis. To apply this to our specific cases \((-x)^{r_1}\) and \((-x)^{r_2}\), we calculate their Wronskian and find it to be non-zero provided \(r_1 eq r_2\). Thus, this affirms their linear independence for \(x < 0\).
Linearly Independent Solutions
Linearly independent solutions are essential when dealing with differential equations because they form the building blocks for general solutions. In simple terms, two functions are linearly independent if neither function is a constant multiple of the other. In the context of differential equations, particularly those of second order like the one in this exercise, having two linearly independent solutions means that we can express the general solution as a linear combination of these two functions. This principle plays a key role when analyzing second-order linear differential equations. If \( r_1 eq r_2 \) are roots of the characteristic equation \( F(r) = 0 \), the solutions \((-x)^{r_1}\) and \((-x)^{r_2}\) are linearly independent. This is because their Wronskian, a measure of their linear dependence, is non-zero. As a result, the general solution to the associated differential equation can be expressed as: \[ y(x) = C_1 (-x)^{r_1} + C_2 (-x)^{r_2}, \] where \(C_1\) and \(C_2\) are constants determined by boundary or initial conditions.
Roots of Polynomial Equations
Understanding the roots of polynomial equations is crucial when solving differential equations. The polynomial equation in this exercise is \( F(r) = r(r-1) + \alpha r + \beta = 0 \). Finding the roots of this polynomial, namely \( r_1 \) and \( r_2 \), helps in identifying solutions to the differential equation \( L[y]=0 \). Solving polynomial equations often involves factoring or using the quadratic formula. For quadratic polynomials, the solution \( r \) can be found using: \[ r = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}, \] where \( a, b, \) and \( c \) are coefficients from the polynomial equation. In our context, the polynomial \( F(r) \) is of quadratic form, thus having potentially two distinct roots \( r_1 \) and \( r_2 \). Identifying these roots is key because they determine the form of the linearly independent solutions to the differential equation. If the roots are distinct, then the solutions \((-x)^{r_1}\) and \((-x)^{r_2}\) provide a fundamental set of solutions, making it easier to express the most general solution of the differential equation. This demonstrates the interrelationship between the algebraic property of roots and their implications in solving differential equations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find all values of \(\alpha\) for which all solutions of \(x^{2} y^{\prime \prime}+\alpha x y^{\prime}+(5 / 2) y=0\) approach zero as \(x \rightarrow \infty\).

Find two linearly independent solutions of the Bessel equation of order \(\frac{3}{2}\), $$ x^{2} y^{\prime \prime}+x y^{\prime}+\left(x^{2}-\frac{9}{4}\right) y=0, \quad x>0 $$

Find all the regular singular points of the given differential equation. Determine the indicial equation and the exponents at the singularity for each regular singular point. \(x^{2} y^{\prime \prime}-x(2+x) y^{\prime}+\left(2+x^{2}\right) y=0\)

Consider the differential equation $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\frac{\alpha}{x^{s}} y^{\prime}+\frac{\beta}{x^{t}} y=0 $$ where \(\alpha \neq 0\) and \(\beta \neq 0\) are real numbers, and \(s\) and \(t\) are positive integers that for the moment are arbitrary. (a) Show that if \(s>1\) or \(t>2,\) then the point \(x=0\) is an irregular singular point. (b) Try to find a solution of Eq. (i) of the form $$ y=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n} x^{r+n}, \quad x>0 $$ Show that if \(s=2\) and \(t=2,\) then there is only one possible value of \(r\) for which there is a formal solution of Eq. (i) of the form (ii). (c) Show that if \(\beta / \alpha=-1,0,1,2, \ldots,\) then the formal solution terminates and therefore is an actual solution. For other values of \(\beta / \alpha\) show that the formal series solution has a zero radius of convergence, and so does not represent an actual solution in any interval.

Consider the Bessel equation of order \(v\) $$ x^{2} y^{\prime \prime}+x y^{\prime}+\left(x^{2}-v^{2}\right)=0, \quad x>0 $$ Take \(v\) real and greater than zero. (a) Show that \(x=0\) is a regular singular point, and that the roots of the indicial equation are \(v\) and \(-v\). (b) Corresponding to the larger root \(v\), show that one solution is $$ y_{1}(x)=x^{v}\left[1+\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{m}}{m !(1+v)(2+v) \cdots(m-1+v)(m+v)}\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{2 m}\right] $$ (c) If \(2 v\) is not an integer, show that a second solution is $$ y_{2}(x)=x^{-v}\left[1+\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{m}}{m !(1-v)(2-v) \cdots(m-1-v)(m-v)}\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{2 m}\right] $$ Note that \(y_{1}(x) \rightarrow 0\) as \(x \rightarrow 0,\) and that \(y_{2}(x)\) is unbounded as \(x \rightarrow 0\). (d) Verify by direct methods that the power series in the expressions for \(y_{1}(x)\) and \(y_{2}(x)\) converge absolutely for all \(x\). Also verify that \(y_{2}\) is a solution provided only that \(v\) is not an integer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free