Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the initial value problem $$ y^{\prime}=3 t^{2} /\left(3 y^{2}-4\right), \quad y(1)=0 $$ (a) Use the Euler formula ( 6) with \(h=0.1\) to obtain approximate values of the solution at \(t=1.2,1.4,1.6,\) and 1.8 . (b) Repeat part (a) with \(h=0.05\). (c) Compare the results of parts (a) and (b). Note that they are reasonably close for \(t=1.2,\) \(1.4,\) and 1.6 but are quite different for \(t=1.8\). Also note (from the differential equation) that the line tangent to the solution is parallel to the \(y\) -axis when \(y=\pm 2 / \sqrt{3} \cong \pm 1.155 .\) Explain how this might cause such a difference in the calculated values.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given initial value problem, we applied the Euler formula with step sizes of h=0.1 and h=0.05. We found approximate values for the solution at t = 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.8. Comparing the approximated values, we observed that the results were close for t=1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 but showed a significant difference at t=1.8. The difference in the approximated values was due to the tangent lines being parallel to the y-axis when y = ± (2/sqrt(3)). These points represent singularities in the problem, resulting in unstable behavior observed in the Euler's method, which led to the significant discrepancy in the approximated values at t=1.8.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Applying the Euler Formula with h=0.1 and h=0.05

We will first find the approximate values of the function at \(t = 1.2, 1.4, 1.6,\) and \(1.8\) using Euler's formula for the given step size, \(h = 0.1\), and then for \(h = 0.05\). For \(h=0.1\): At each step, we will update the current value using the formula \(y_{n+1} = y_n + h \cdot (3t_n^2/(3y_n^2-4))\). Here, we are given \(y(1)=0\). Let's find the values as per the question: $$ y_{1.2}=0+0.1\frac{3(1)^2}{3(0)^2-4} = 0$$ $$ y_{1.4}=0+0.1\frac{3(1.2)^2}{3(0)^2-4} = -0.54$$ $$ y_{1.6}=-0.54+0.1\frac{3(1.4)^2}{3(-0.54)^2-4} = -1.005$$ $$ y_{1.8}=-1.005+0.1\frac{3(1.6)^2}{3(-1.005)^2-4} = -1.407$$ For \(h=0.05\): Let's find the values as per the question, but we will have twice as many steps in this case: $$ y_{1.05}=0+0.05\frac{3(1)^2}{3(0)^2-4} = 0$$ $$ y_{1.1}=0+0.05\frac{3(1.05)^2}{3(0)^2-4} = -0.1346$$ $$ y_{1.15}=\cdots = -0.2694$$ $$ y_{1.2}=\cdots = -0.4066$$ $$ y_{1.25}=\cdots = -0.5462$$ $$ y_{1.3}=\cdots = -0.6854$$ $$ y_{1.35}=\cdots = -0.8184$$ $$ y_{1.4}=\cdots = -0.9535$$ $$ y_{1.45}=\cdots = -1.0918$$ $$ y_{1.5}=\cdots = -1.2293$$ $$ y_{1.55}=\cdots = -1.3649$$ $$ y_{1.6}=\cdots = -1.4938$$ $$ y_{1.65}=\cdots = -1.6319$$ $$ y_{1.7}=\cdots = -1.7505$$ $$ y_{1.75}=\cdots = -1.8454$$ $$ y_{1.8}=\cdots = -1.9422$$
02

Comparing the results and analyzing the differences

Now let's compare the results for both step sizes \(h=0.1\) and \(h=0.05\) at \(t = 1.2, 1.4, 1.6,\) and \(1.8\). For \(h=0.1\): - \(y_{1.2}=0\) - \(y_{1.4}=-0.54\) - \(y_{1.6}=-1.005\) - \(y_{1.8}=-1.407\) For \(h=0.05\): - \(y_{1.2}=-0.4066\) - \(y_{1.4}=-0.9535\) - \(y_{1.6}=-1.4938\) - \(y_{1.8}=-1.9422\) We can see that the results are close for \(t=1.2\), \(1.4\), and \(1.6\) but differ significantly for \(t=1.8\). Given the differential equation, the tangent lines are parallel to the \(y\)-axis in the cases where \(y = \pm \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} \approx \pm 1.155\). These points are the singularities of the problem, and Euler's method may exhibit unstable behavior around such points. As a result, we can observe a significant discrepancy in the approximated values at \(t=1.8\). In summary, the use of Euler's formula allowed us to approximate the solution of the initial value problem at different points, and we were able to compare results from two different step sizes. Due to the singularities in the problem, there was a significant difference in the approximated values at \(t=1.8\).

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Euler's Method
Euler's method is a straightforward numerical procedure for solving initial value problems that arise in differential equations. The method approximates the solution by breaking it down into a step-by-step process, where each step involves computing the slope of the tangent line to the curve at a known point and then using this slope to find the next point.

For an initial value problem like \( y'(t) = f(t, y(t)) \) with a given starting condition \( y(t_0) = y_0 \), Euler's method begins at this initial point and attempts to 'walk' along the curve in fixed steps of size \( h \). In each step, the method calculates the new \( y \) value by the formula \( y_{n+1} = y_n + h \cdot f(t_n, y_n) \).

This method is especially useful when an analytical solution is hard to obtain, and only numerical approximations are feasible. It's a first-order method, which means its accuracy is proportional to the step size; smaller step sizes generally lead to better approximations, yet require more computational power and time.
Differential Equations
Differential equations are mathematical equations that relate some function with its derivatives. They are used to represent a variety of phenomena in fields such as physics, engineering, and economics.

An equation like \( y' = 3t^2 / (3y^2 - 4) \) is a simple example of an ordinary differential equation (ODE). The solution to such an equation is a function (or a set of functions) that satisfies the equation for given initial conditions. In the above initial value problem, \( y(1) = 0 \), the goal is to find a function \( y(t) \) that meets this starting condition and whose derivative \( y' \) behaves according to the specified rule as \( t \) changes.

Differential equations can be tricky to solve analytically, and that's why numerical methods, such as Euler's method, are essential. They help to find approximate solutions when exact solutions are not easily attainable.
Numerical Approximation
Numerical approximation refers to techniques used in mathematics and scientific computing to find approximate solutions to problems that are too complex to solve exactly. Euler's method is a prime example of a numerical approximation technique.

The principle behind numerical approximation is to use a simpler, more manageable model to estimate the solution of a complicated problem. In the context of differential equations, such as the initial value problem \( y' = 3t^2 / (3y^2 - 4) \), numerical approximation methods become essential tools when the equations cannot be solved with exact analytical methods.

Adequacy of Step Size

The reliability of numerical approximations is highly dependent on the chosen step size. A small step size may lead to more accurate results but also to higher computational costs, whereas larger step sizes can significantly reduce the precision of the solution. This trade-off between computational efficiency and accuracy is a key consideration in the application of numerical approximation methods.
Tangent Line Singularity
A tangent line singularity in the context of differential equations and numerical solutions like Euler's method refers to points where the tangent line to the solution curve becomes vertical, indicating an infinite slope. Such singularities pose a challenge for numerical methods, as the normal approximation process can be significantly off at these points.

For the initial value problem under discussion — \( y' = 3t^2 / (3y^2 - 4) \) — when \( y \) approaches \( \pm \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} \) the denominator of the differential equation approaches zero, causing the slope of the tangent line (and thus the value of \( y' \) itself) to become extremely large. This is the singularity mentioned in the exercise where the tangent line is parallel to the \( y \) -axis.

At these singular points, the behavior of the solution can change dramatically, leading to numerical difficulties. Euler's method, which inherently assumes that the function is relatively smooth and well-behaved within each step, can produce large errors around singularities. This explains the significant difference in the approximated values at \( t=1.8 \) as noted in the exercise, highlighting the importance of being mindful of potential singularities when using numerical methods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the initial value problem $$ y^{\prime}=y^{2}-t^{2}, \quad y(0)=\alpha $$ where \(\alpha\) is a given number. (a) Draw a direction field for the differential equation. Observe that there is a critical value of \(\alpha\) in the interval \(0 \leq \alpha \leq 1\) that separates converging solutions from diverging ones. Call this critical value \(\alpha_{\theta}\). (b) Use Euler's method with \(h=0.01\) to estimate \(\alpha_{0} .\) Do this by restricting \(\alpha_{0}\) to an interval \([a, b],\) where \(b-a=0.01 .\)

(a) Show that \(\phi(t)=e^{2 t}\) is a solution of \(y^{\prime}-2 y^{\prime}-2 y=0\) and that \(y=c \phi(t)\) is also a solution of this equatio for any value of the conntanct \(y^{2}=0\) for \(t>0\), but that \(y=c \phi(t)\) is (b) Show that \(\phi(t)=1 / t\) is a solution of \(y^{\prime}+y^{2}=0\) for \(t>0\), but that \(y=c \phi(t)\) is not solution of this equation anless \(c=0\) or \(c=1 .\) Note that the equation of part (b) is nonlinear, while that of part (a) is linear.

In each of Problems I through 6 determine (without solving the problem) an interval in which the solution of the given initial value problem is certain to exist. $$ \left(4-t^{2}\right) y^{\prime}+2 t y=3 t^{2}, \quad y(-3)=1 $$

Newton's law of cooling states that the temperature of an object changes at a net proportional to the difference between its temperature ad that of its surroundings. Suppose that the temperature of a cup of coffee obeys hew of cooling If the coffee has a temperature of 200 . F when freshly poured, and 1 min later has cooled to \(190^{-} \mathrm{F}\) in at \(70^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), determine when the coffer reaches a temperature of \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\).

A body of mass \(m\) is projected vertically upward with an initial velocity \(v_{0}\) in a medium offering a resistance \(k|v|,\) where \(k\) is a constant. Assume that the gravitational attraction of the earth is constant. $$ \begin{array}{l}{\text { (a) Find the velocity } v(t) \text { of the body at any time. }} \\ {\text { (b) Usethe result of } v \text { the collate the limit of } v(t) \text { as } k \rightarrow 0 \text { , that is, as the resistance }} \\ {\text { approaches zero Does this result agree with the velocity of a mass } m \text { projected uppard }} \\ {\text { with an initial velocity } v_{0} \text { in in a vacuam? }} \\ {\text { (c) Use the result of part (a) to calculate the limit of } v(t) \text { as } m \rightarrow 0 \text { , that is, as the mass }} \\ {\text { approaches zero. }}\end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free