Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In this problem we show by examples that the (Riemann) integrability of \(f\) and \(f^{2}\) are independent. (a) Let \(f(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}{x^{-1 / 2},} & {0

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Show that the integrability of \(f\) and \(f^2\) are independent when \(f\) is defined as the following functions. (a) \(f(x) = x^{-1/2}\) for \(0 < x \leq 1\) (b) \(f(x) = 1\) if \(x\) is rational and \(f(x) = -1\) if \(x\) is irrational for \(0 \leq x \leq 1\) Answer: (a) We have shown in the solution that the improper integral \(\int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx\) exists but \(\int_{0}^{1} f^2(x) dx\) does not exist. (b) We have shown in the solution that the integral \(\int_{0}^{1} f^2(x) dx\) exists but \(f(x)\) does not have an integral because it is discontinuous at every point in the interval. This demonstrates that the integrability of \(f\) and \(f^2\) are indeed independent.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Compute the integral of \(f(x)\)

For \(0<x\leq 1\), we have \(f(x)=x^{-1/2}\). To show that the integral \(\int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx\) exists as an improper integral, we need to compute its limit: $$\lim_{a \to 0^+} \int_{a}^{1} x^{-1/2} dx$$ This is an improper integral, so we first compute the antiderivative of \(x^{-1/2}\) which is \(2x^{1/2}\), and then calculate the limit.
02

Evaluate the limit

Now, let's evaluate the limit: $$\lim_{a \to 0^+} \left[ 2x^{1/2} \right]_a^1 = \lim_{a \to 0^+} (2(1)^{1/2} - 2a^{1/2}) = 2-0 =2$$ Since the limit exists, the improper integral \(\int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx\) exists.
03

Compute the integral of \(f^2(x)\)

For \(0<x\leq 1\), we have \(f^2(x)=x^{-1}\). To show that the integral \(\int_{0}^{1} f^2(x) dx\) does not exist, we need to compute its limit: $$\lim_{a \to 0^+} \int_{a}^{1} x^{-1} dx$$ First, compute the antiderivative of \(x^{-1}\), which is \(\ln(x)\), and then calculate the limit.
04

Evaluate the limit

Let's evaluate the limit: $$\lim_{a \to 0^+} \left[ \ln(x) \right]_a^1 = \lim_{a \to 0^+} (\ln(1) - \ln(a)) = \lim_{a \to 0^+} -\ln(a)$$ Since the limit does not exist (it goes to infinity), the improper integral \(\int_{0}^{1} f^2(x) dx\) does not exist. ##Part (b)##
05

Compute the integral of \(f^2(x)\)

Since \(f^2(x)\) would be 1 for all x, we have a simple integral from 0 to 1: $$\int_{0}^{1} f^2(x) dx = \int_{0}^{1} 1 dx$$ We can compute the antiderivative of 1, which is \(x\), and evaluate it from 0 to 1. The integral is \(1-0=1\), so the integral of \(f^2(x)\) exists.
06

Show that the integral of \(f(x)\) does not exist

The function \(f(x)\) is not Riemann integrable because it is not continuous on any interval, as it takes the values 1 and -1 at every point. When the function is discontinuous at every point in the interval, it is not Riemann integrable. Therefore, \(\int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx\) does not exist. This demonstrates that the integrability of \(f\) and \(f^2\) are indeed independent.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Improper Integrals
Improper integrals are a crucial concept when dealing with certain types of functions where the traditional definite integral cannot be applied directly. These integrals are used when the function has infinite discontinuities or the limits of integration extend to infinity.
To evaluate an improper integral, we often take a limit to handle these complexities. For instance, in the integral \( \int_{0}^{1} x^{-1/2} \, dx \), instead of directly solving from 0 to 1, we examine \( \lim_{a \to 0^+} \int_{a}^{1} x^{-1/2} \, dx \). This approach allows us to bypass the point of discontinuity at \( x = 0 \), ensuring a solution.
  • Convert the integral into a limit problem.
  • Focus on the antiderivatives during evaluation.
  • Approach highlights handling infinite boundaries or singularities.
Properly understanding improper integrals is key to solving problems with limits and discontinuities effectively.
Antiderivatives
Antiderivatives, or indefinite integrals, reverse the process of differentiation. They are essential in evaluating integrals, especially when dealing with improper integrals.
  • An antiderivative of a function \( f(x) \) is a function \( F(x) \) such that \( F'(x) = f(x) \).
  • For example, the antiderivative of \( x^{-1/2} \) is \( 2x^{1/2} \).
  • This concept helps convert an integral problem into a simpler evaluation using limits.
In problems involving improper integrals, antiderivatives simplify the calculations.We compute the antiderivative first, then evaluate it through limits.This sequential approach helps handle the infinite behaviors present in certain functions, ensuring we can effectively evaluate their integrals.
Discontinuous Functions
Discontinuous functions pose a challenge for standard Riemann integrability as they might not behave nicely across an interval. When a function isn't continuous over any part of the interval, Riemann integration becomes problematic.
  • If a function constantly switches between two values, like 1 or -1, across its domain, it is discontinuous at every point.
  • This leads to difficulties in integrating because there is no stable area under the curve that can be quantified.
  • Examples include functions that alternate values based on whether \( x \) is rational or irrational.
Despite these challenges, it is essential to recognize how such behaviors impact integrability.Traditional methods may fail, so alternative integration approaches or reviews of the function's behavior are vital for analysis.
Limit Evaluation
Limit evaluation is often necessary when dealing with improper integrals, since we can't evaluate normally at points of discontinuity or boundaries of infinity. By incorporating limits, we work around these points.
  • Transition infinite bounds or discontinuous behaviors into a limit expression.
  • Handle evaluations by substituting limits that approach the problematic points.
  • Observe the results to ascertain if a reasonable finite limit exists.
In the example of \( \int_{0}^{1} x^{-1/2} \, dx \), using \( \lim_{a \to 0^+} (2(1)^{1/2} - 2a^{1/2}) \) let us evaluate around \( x = 0 \) gracefully without encountering undefined solutions.Thus, limit evaluation ensures integral solutions in complex scenarios, crucial for determining the behavior and area under curves that are problematic for traditional methods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider Laplace's equation \(u_{x x}+u_{y y}=0\) in the parallelogram whose vertices are \((0,0),\) \((2,0),(3,2),\) and \((1,2) .\) Suppose that on the side \(y=2\) the boundary condition is \(u(x, 2)=\) \(f(x) \text { for } 1 \leq x \leq 3, \text { and that on the other three sides } u=0 \text { (see Figure } 11.5 .1) .\) (a) Show that there are nontrivial solutions of the partial differential equation of the form \(u(x, y)=X(x) Y(y)\) that also satisfy the homogeneous boundary conditions. (b) Let \(\xi=x-\frac{1}{2} y, \eta=y .\) Show that the given parallelogram in the \(x y\) -plane transforms into the square \(0 \leq \xi \leq 2,0 \leq \eta \leq 2\) in the \(\xi \eta\) -plane. Show that the differential equation transforms into $$ \frac{5}{4} u_{\xi \xi}-u_{\xi \eta}+u_{\eta \eta}=0 $$ How are the boundary conditions transformed? (c) Show that in the \(\xi \eta\) -plane the differential equation possesses no solution of the form $$ u(\xi, \eta)=U(\xi) V(\eta) $$ Thus in the \(x y\) -plane the shape of the boundary precludes a solution by the method of the separation of variables, while in the \(\xi \eta\) -plane the region is acceptable but the variables in the differential equation can no longer be separated.

Determine whether there is any value of the constant \(a\) for which the problem has a solution. Find the solution for each such value. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\pi^{2} y=a, \quad y^{\prime}(0)=0, \quad y^{\prime}(1)=0 $$

Suppose that it is desired to construct a set of polynomials \(f_{0}(x), f_{1}(x), f_{2}(x), \ldots,\) \(f_{k}(x), \ldots,\) where \(f_{k}(x)\) is of degree \(k,\) that are orthonormal on the interval \(0 \leq x \leq 1\) That is, the set of polynomials must satisfy $$ \left(f_{j}, f_{k}\right)=\int_{0}^{1} f_{j}(x) f_{k}(x) d x=\delta_{j k} $$ (a) Find \(f_{0}(x)\) by choosing the polynomial of degree zero such that \(\left(f_{0}, f_{0}\right)=1 .\) (b) Find \(f_{1}(x)\) by determining the polynomial of degree one such that \(\left(f_{0}, f_{1}\right)=0\) and \(\left(f_{1}, f_{1}\right)=1\) (c) Find \(f_{2}(x)\) (d) The normalization condition \(\left(f_{k}, f_{k}\right)=1\) is somewhat awkward to apply. Let \(g_{0}(x)\) \(g_{1}(x), \ldots, g_{k}(x), \ldots\) be the sequence of polynomials that are orthogonal on \(0 \leq x \leq 1\) and that are normalized by the condition \(g_{k}(1)=1 .\) Find \(g_{0}(x), g_{1}(x),\) and \(g_{2}(x)\) and compare them with \(f_{0}(x), f_{1}(x),\) and \(f_{2}(x) .\)

Consider the boundary value problem $$ -\left(x y^{\prime}\right)^{\prime}=\lambda x y $$ \(y, y^{\prime}\) bounded as \(x \rightarrow 0, \quad y^{\prime}(1)=0\) (a) Show that \(\lambda_{0}=0\) is an eigenvalue of this problem corresponding to the eigenfunction \(\phi_{0}(x)=1 .\) If \(\lambda>0,\) show formally that the eigenfunctions are given by \(\phi_{n}(x)=\) \(J_{0}(\sqrt{\lambda_{n}} x),\) where \(\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}\) is the \(n\) th positive root (in increasing order) of the equation \(J_{0}^{\prime}(\sqrt{\lambda})=0 .\) It is possible to show that there is an infinite sequence of such roots. (b) Show that if \(m, n=0,1,2, \ldots,\) then $$ \int_{0}^{1} x \phi_{m}(x) \phi_{n}(x) d x=0, \quad m \neq n $$ (c) Find a formal solution to the nonhomogeneous problem $$ \begin{aligned}-\left(x y^{\prime}\right)^{\prime} &=\mu x y+f(x) \\ y, y^{\prime} \text { bounded as } x \rightarrow 0, & y^{\prime}(1)=0 \end{aligned} $$ where \(f\) is a given continuous function on \(0 \leq x \leq 1,\) and \(\mu\) is not an eigenvalue of the corresponding homogeneous problem.

Use the method of Problem 11 to transform the given equation into the form \(\left[p(x) y^{\prime}\right]'+q(x) y=0\) $$ x^{2} y^{\prime \prime}+x y^{\prime}+\left(x^{2}-v^{2}\right) y=0, \quad \text { Bessel equation } $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free