Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In this problem we show that pointwise convergence of a sequence \(S_{n}(x)\) does not imply mean convergence, and conversely. (a) Let \(S_{n}(x)=n \sqrt{x} e^{-n x^{2} / 2}, 0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Show that \(S_{n}(x) \rightarrow 0\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty\) for each \(x\) in \(0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Show also that $$ R_{n}=\int_{0}^{1}\left[0-S_{n}(x)\right]^{2} d x=\frac{n}{2}\left(1-e^{-n}\right) $$ and hence that \(R_{n} \rightarrow \infty\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty .\) Thus pointwise convergence does not imply mean convergence. (b) Let \(S_{n}(x)=x^{n}\) for \(0 \leq x \leq 1\) and let \(f(x)=0\) for \(0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Show that $$ R_{n}=\int_{0}^{1}\left[f(x)-S_{n}(x)\right]^{2} d x=\frac{1}{2 n+1} $$ and hence \(S_{n}(x)\) converges to \(f(x)\) in the mean. Also show that \(S_{n}(x)\) does not converge to \(f(x)\) pointwise throughout \(0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Thus mean convergence does not imply pointwise convergence.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Provide counterexamples showing that pointwise convergence and mean convergence are not equivalent. Answer: For part (a), consider the sequence \(S_{n}(x)=n \sqrt{x} e^{-n x^{2} / 2}\). This sequence converges pointwise to 0 as \(n\rightarrow\infty\), but its mean square error, \(R_n = \frac{n}{2}(1-e^{-n})\), diverges to infinity as \(n\rightarrow\infty\). This demonstrates that pointwise convergence does not imply mean convergence. For part (b), consider the sequence \(S_{n}(x)=x^{n}\). This sequence converges in the mean to \(f(x)=0\), since the mean square error \(R_n = \frac{1}{2n+1}\) goes to 0 as \(n\rightarrow\infty\). However, the sequence does not converge pointwise to \(f(x)\) in the entire interval \([0, 1]\), as the limit of \(S_{n}(x)\) is 0 for \(0 < x < 1\), and 1 for \(x=1\). This shows that mean convergence does not imply pointwise convergence throughout the entire domain.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Part (a): Pointwise Convergence

To show pointwise convergence of the sequence \(S_{n}(x)\) to 0 as \(n\rightarrow\infty\), we will find the limit of \(S_{n}(x)\) as \(n\rightarrow\infty\) for each fixed \(x\) in \(0 \leq x \leq 1\): $$ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} S_{n}(x) = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(n \sqrt{x} e^{-n x^{2} / 2}\right) = 0 $$ The limit is 0 because \(e^{-n x^{2} / 2}\) approaches 0 faster than the remaining term \(n \sqrt{x}\) grows.
02

Part (a): Compute \(R_{n}\)

Next, we will compute the mean square error \(R_n\) as follows: \begin{align*} R_{n}&=\int_{0}^{1}\left[0-S_{n}(x)\right]^{2} dx \\ &=\int_{0}^{1}\left[n^{2} x e^{-n x^{2}}\right] dx \\ &= \frac{n}{2}\int_{0}^{1}\left[n x^{3} e^{-n x^{2}}\right] dx\quad\text{(Let } u = n x^2 \text{, then }du=2nx dx\text{)}\\ &= \frac{n}{2}\int_{0}^{n}\left[u^{3/2} e^{-u}\right] du \\ &= \frac{n}{2}\left(1-e^{-n}\right) \end{align*}
03

Part (a): Show \(R_n\) Diverges

Finally, we will show that \(R_{n}\) diverges as \(n\rightarrow\infty\): $$ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} R_{n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{n}{2}\left(1-e^{-n}\right)=\infty $$ Therefore, pointwise convergence does not imply mean convergence.
04

Part (b): Convergence in Mean

First, we will compute the mean square error for the sequence \(S_{n}(x)=x^{n}\) and show it converges to 0 as \(n\rightarrow\infty\): $$ R_{n}=\int_{0}^{1}\left[f(x)-S_{n}(x)\right]^{2} dx=\int_{0}^{1}\left[x^{2n}\right] dx=\frac{1}{2n+1} $$ We notice that, $$ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} R_{n} =\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{2n+1}=0 $$ Thus, the sequence \(S_{n}(x)\) converges to \(f(x)=0\) in the mean.
05

Part (b): Showing Absence of Pointwise Convergence

Now, let's show that \(S_{n}(x)\) does not converge to \(f(x)=0\) pointwise throughout the whole interval \(0 \leq x \leq 1\): For \(0 < x < 1\), we have pointwise convergence: $$ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} S_{n}(x) = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(x^{n}\right)=0 $$ However, at \(x=1\), we have: $$ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} S_{n}(x) = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(1^{n}\right)=1 $$ This shows that mean convergence does not imply pointwise convergence throughout the entire domain.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Pointwise Convergence
Pointwise convergence occurs when, for each individual point in a domain, a sequence of functions approaches a limiting function. In mathematical terms, a sequence \( S_n(x) \) is pointwise convergent to another function \( f(x) \) if for every \( x \) within a particular interval, \( \lim_{n \to \infty} S_n(x) = f(x) \) holds.
For example, if we consider the sequence \( S_n(x) = n \sqrt{x} e^{-nx^2 / 2} \) over the interval \( 0 \leq x \leq 1 \), it converges pointwise to 0, since for each fixed \( x \), the exponential term \( e^{-nx^2/2} \) tends towards zero more swiftly than the \( n \sqrt{x} \) term increases. Thus, \( S_n(x) \to 0 \) as \( n \to \infty \) for every \( x \) within this range.
However, as this scenario also demonstrates, pointwise convergence does not ensure convergence of related integrals or averages, underscoring the need to distinguish it from other convergence types.
Mean Convergence
Mean convergence takes a holistic view rather than a point-specific one. It involves the convergence of the averages (mean values) of a sequence of functions. It's often analyzed by calculating the mean square error between a sequence and a limit function.
In the context of our example, mean convergence checks whether \( \int_{0}^{1}[S_n(x) - f(x)]^2 dx \) tends towards zero as \( n \to \infty \).
For the function \( S_n(x) = x^n \), it can be shown that it converges in the mean to \( f(x) = 0 \) because the integral of \( x^{2n} \) across \( 0 \leq x \leq 1 \) results in \( \frac{1}{2n+1} \), which approaches zero as \( n \to \infty \).
Mean convergence provides an average-based measure and doesn't require the function to converge at every individual point, thus capturing a different aspect of convergence than pointwise convergence.
Mean Square Error
The mean square error (MSE) quantifies the difference between a sequence of functions and a target function over an interval, serving as a crucial tool for understanding mean convergence. It is calculated as the integral of the squared differences: \[R_n = \int_{0}^{1} [f(x) - S_n(x)]^2 dx.\]
When \( R_n \to 0 \) as \( n \to \infty \), it indicates that the sequence converges to the target function in the mean. For instance, in the sequence \( S_n(x) = x^n \) converging to \( f(x) = 0 \), the MSE becomes \( \frac{1}{2n+1} \), illustrating mean convergence as \( R_n \to 0 \).
On the other hand, for the sequence \( S_n(x) = n \sqrt{x} e^{-nx^2/2} \), the MSE \( R_n = \frac{n}{2}(1 - e^{-n}) \) does not tend to zero as \( n \to \infty \), thus demonstrating that despite pointwise convergence to zero, the mean convergence fails, with MSE offering an insightful perspective into these dynamics.
Limit of Functions
Understanding the limit of functions within a sequence is crucial for analyzing convergence. In a sequence \( S_n(x) \), the limit identifies whether \( \lim_{n \to \infty} S_n(x) = f(x) \) can hold for each, some, or none of the points \( x \) in the domain under consideration.
When dealing with the sequence \( S_n(x) = n \sqrt{x} e^{-nx^2/2} \), despite each point converging separately to 0, the integrated or average behavior diverges, illustrating the intricacies of function limits in sequences.
The concept of limits is central to distinguishing algorithmic patterns in convergence analyses, indicating whether the progression towards a target function is succeeded or not across different convergence types. As exemplified, function limits can reveal inconsistencies between individual and collective convergence behaviors, which is vital when determining the overall fidelity of function approximation in sequences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that if the functions \(u\) and \(v\) satisfy \(\mathrm{Eqs}\). (2), and either \(a_{2}=0\) or \(b_{2}=0,\) or both, then $$ \left.p(x)\left[u^{\prime}(x) v(x)-u(x) v^{\prime}(x)\right]\right|_{0} ^{1}=0 $$

Consider Laplace's equation \(u_{x x}+u_{y y}=0\) in the parallelogram whose vertices are \((0,0),\) \((2,0),(3,2),\) and \((1,2) .\) Suppose that on the side \(y=2\) the boundary condition is \(u(x, 2)=\) \(f(x) \text { for } 1 \leq x \leq 3, \text { and that on the other three sides } u=0 \text { (see Figure } 11.5 .1) .\) (a) Show that there are nontrivial solutions of the partial differential equation of the form \(u(x, y)=X(x) Y(y)\) that also satisfy the homogeneous boundary conditions. (b) Let \(\xi=x-\frac{1}{2} y, \eta=y .\) Show that the given parallelogram in the \(x y\) -plane transforms into the square \(0 \leq \xi \leq 2,0 \leq \eta \leq 2\) in the \(\xi \eta\) -plane. Show that the differential equation transforms into $$ \frac{5}{4} u_{\xi \xi}-u_{\xi \eta}+u_{\eta \eta}=0 $$ How are the boundary conditions transformed? (c) Show that in the \(\xi \eta\) -plane the differential equation possesses no solution of the form $$ u(\xi, \eta)=U(\xi) V(\eta) $$ Thus in the \(x y\) -plane the shape of the boundary precludes a solution by the method of the separation of variables, while in the \(\xi \eta\) -plane the region is acceptable but the variables in the differential equation can no longer be separated.

Consider the boundary value problem $$ r(x) u_{t}=\left[p(x) u_{x}\right]_{x}-q(x) u+F(x) $$ $$ u(0, t)=T_{1}, \quad u(1, t)=T_{2}, \quad u(x, 0)=f(x) $$ (a) Let \(v(x)\) be a solution of the problem $$ \left[p(x) v^{\prime}\right]-q(x) v=-F(x), \quad v(0)=T_{1}, \quad v(1)=T_{2} $$ If \(w(x, t)=u(x, t)-v(x),\) find the boundary value problem satisfied by \(w\), Note that this problem can be solved by the method of this section. (b) Generalize the procedure of part (a) to the case \(u\) satisfies the boundary conditions $$ u_{x}(0, t)-h_{1} u(0, t)=T_{1}, \quad u_{x}(1, t)+h_{2} u(1, t)=T_{2} $$

determine the normalized eigenfunctions of the given problem. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\lambda y=0, \quad y^{\prime}(0)=0, \quad y(1)=0 $$

Show that the problem $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\pi^{2} y=\pi^{2} x, \quad y(0)=1, \quad y(1)=0 $$ has the solution $$ y=c_{1} \sin \pi x+\cos \pi x+x $$ Also show that this solution cannot be obtained by splitting the problem as suggested in Problem \(15,\) since neither of the two subsidiary problems can be solved in this case.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free