Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the boundary value problem $$ -\left(x y^{\prime}\right)^{\prime}=\lambda x y $$ \(y, y^{\prime}\) bounded as \(x \rightarrow 0, \quad y^{\prime}(1)=0\) (a) Show that \(\lambda_{0}=0\) is an eigenvalue of this problem corresponding to the eigenfunction \(\phi_{0}(x)=1 .\) If \(\lambda>0,\) show formally that the eigenfunctions are given by \(\phi_{n}(x)=\) \(J_{0}(\sqrt{\lambda_{n}} x),\) where \(\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}\) is the \(n\) th positive root (in increasing order) of the equation \(J_{0}^{\prime}(\sqrt{\lambda})=0 .\) It is possible to show that there is an infinite sequence of such roots. (b) Show that if \(m, n=0,1,2, \ldots,\) then $$ \int_{0}^{1} x \phi_{m}(x) \phi_{n}(x) d x=0, \quad m \neq n $$ (c) Find a formal solution to the nonhomogeneous problem $$ \begin{aligned}-\left(x y^{\prime}\right)^{\prime} &=\mu x y+f(x) \\ y, y^{\prime} \text { bounded as } x \rightarrow 0, & y^{\prime}(1)=0 \end{aligned} $$ where \(f\) is a given continuous function on \(0 \leq x \leq 1,\) and \(\mu\) is not an eigenvalue of the corresponding homogeneous problem.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given information, we solved the boundary value problem involving an ordinary differential equation to find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. Then, we used them to expand and formally solve the nonhomogeneous problem. We showed that λ₀ = 0 is an eigenvalue corresponding to the eigenfunction φ₀(x) = 1, proved the orthogonality of eigenfunctions, and found the formal solution of the nonhomogeneous problem in terms of the eigenfunctions.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the given ODE

Consider the given ODE: $$ -\left(x y^{\prime}\right)^{\prime}=\lambda x y $$ We are given that \(y\) and \(y'\) are bounded as \(x \rightarrow 0\), and \(y^{\prime}(1)=0\). We are asked to show that \(\lambda_{0}=0\) is an eigenvalue corresponding to the eigenfunction \(\phi_{0}(x)=1\).
02

Calculate the solution for \(\lambda=0\)

Plug \(\lambda=0\) into the ODE, and integrate twice: $$ -\left(x y^{\prime}\right)^{\prime}=0 $$ Integrating once, we get: $$ xy^{\prime}=C_{1} $$ Now integrate for \(y(x)\): $$ y(x)=C_{1}\int\frac{1}{x}dx+C_{2}=C_{1}\ln(x)+C_{2} $$ Now we apply the boundary conditions: \(y\) and \(y^{\prime}\) are bounded as \(x\to 0\). This implies that \(C_{1}=0\), as \(\ln(x)\) would be unbounded as \(x\to0\). Thus, $$ y(x)=C_{2} $$ Now, using the condition \(y^{\prime}(1)=0\), we find that the eigenfunction is \(\phi_{0}(x)=1\) and the corresponding eigenvalue is \(\lambda_{0}=0\).
03

Formal solution for the eigenfunctions when \(\lambda>0\)

We look for the solutions of the ODE as \(\lambda>0\): $$ -\left(xy^{\prime}\right)^{\prime}=\lambda x y $$ We seek a solution of the form \(y(x)=r(x)J_{0}(kx)\). Substituting this into the ODE, we obtain an equation for the function \(r(x)\): $$ -\left(x \left[r^{\prime}(x)J_{0}(kx)+kr(x)J_{0}^{\prime}(kx)\right]\right)^{\prime}=\lambda x \left[r(x)J_{0}(kx)\right] $$ Now, simplify and divide by \(xJ_{0}(kx)\): $$ -\left[r^{\prime}(x)+kr(x)\frac{J_{0}^{\prime}(kx)}{J_{0}(kx)}\right]^{\prime}=\lambda r(x) $$ This is a first-order ODE for \(r(x)\): $$ r^{\prime}(x)+kr(x)\frac{J_{0}^{\prime}(kx)}{J_{0}(kx)}=\frac{1}{x}r^{\prime\prime}(x) $$ r(x) must be of the form \(A\frac{1}{x}\). Thus, by equating the coefficients of \(r^{\prime\prime}\) and \(r^{\prime}\), we have: $$ k^2=λ $$ So, from the given question, we have: $$\phi_{n}(x)=J_{0}(\sqrt{\lambda_{n}} x)=J_{0}(kx)$$ with the condition that \(J_{0}^{\prime}(k)=0\)
04

Orthogonality of the eigenfunctions

Now we will prove the orthogonality of eigenfunctions: $$ \int_{0}^{1} x \phi_{m}(x) \phi_{n}(x) d x=0, \quad m \neq n $$ We have \(\phi_{m}(x)=J_{0}(\sqrt{\lambda_{m}} x)\) and \(\phi_{n}(x)=J_{0}(\sqrt{\lambda_{n}} x)\). We can use the orthogonality property of the Bessel functions: $$ \int_0^1 x J_{0}(a x) J_{0}(bx) dx=0, \quad a \neq b $$ Thus, when \(m \neq n\): $$ \int_{0}^{1} x \phi_{m}(x) \phi_{n}(x) d x= 0 $$
05

Formal solution to the nonhomogeneous problem

Now we try to find the solution of the given nonhomogeneous problem: $$ \begin{aligned}-\left(x y^{\prime}\right)^{\prime} &=\mu x y+f(x) \\\ y, y^{\prime} \text { bounded as } x \rightarrow 0, & y^{\prime}(1)=0 \end{aligned} $$ We need to find the formal solution in terms of the eigenfunctions found in previous steps. We expand the solution \(y(x)\) in terms of the eigenfunctions as: $$ y(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_n \phi_n(x) $$ We can find the coefficients \(c_n\) using the orthogonality property: $$ c_n=\frac{\int_0^1 x \phi_n(x) f(x) dx}{\int_0^1 x \phi_n^2(x) dx} $$ Thus, the formal solution of the nonhomogeneous problem is: $$ y(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\int_0^1 x \phi_n(x) f(x) dx}{\int_0^1 x \phi_n^2(x) dx} \phi_n(x) $$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Boundary Value Problems
A boundary value problem involves finding a solution to a differential equation that satisfies certain conditions at the boundary of the domain. Unlike initial value problems, where the solution is known at an initial point and extends along an interval, boundary value problems specify conditions at multiple points.
To illustrate, consider the given differential equation \[-(x y')' = \lambda x y \], accompanied by boundary conditions: \( y \) and \( y' \) bounded as \( x \rightarrow 0 \), and \( y'(1) = 0 \). These conditions ensure the behavior of the solution at the endpoints of the interval.

In solving boundary value problems, we often look for eigenvalues and eigenfunctions that satisfy these boundary conditions. This particular dilemma expects determining such values where \( \lambda \) is zero, leading us to the simple constant eigenfunction \( \phi_0(x) = 1 \).
Overall, boundary value problems are fundamental in mathematical modeling, describing phenomena where conditions are known at the limits of the physical system.
Exploring Bessel Functions
Bessel functions appear frequently in solving boundary value problems with circular or cylindrical symmetry. These special functions satisfy Bessel's differential equation, often occurring in problems involving cylindrical coordinates or vibrations of circular membranes.

The given exercise introduces Bessel functions as eigenfunctions, \( \phi_n(x) = J_0(\sqrt{\lambda_n} x) \), where \( J_0 \) is the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero. This reflects the oscillatory nature and zero motion at the edges, seen in their applications, like waves on a drumhead.
In the context of this problem, \( \sqrt{\lambda_n} \) are roots of the equation \( J_0'(\sqrt{\lambda}) = 0 \), providing a sequence of eigenvalues essential for boundary problems.

Bessel functions’ applications extend into physics and engineering, significant in scenarios like heat conduction and electromagnetism.
Orthogonality of Eigenfunctions
Orthogonality of eigenfunctions is a profound concept that simplifies complex boundary value problems. Eigenfunctions associated with distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal over a prescribed interval with a weight function.

For this boundary value problem, orthogonality means that
\[ \int_{0}^{1} x \phi_m(x) \phi_n(x) \, dx = 0, \quad m eq n \],
implies the integral of the product of different eigenfunctions weighted by \( x \) is zero, given they are driven by distinct eigenvalues.
Orthogonal functions enable the expansion of arbitrary functions in terms of these eigenfunctions, much like Fourier series.

This property is crucial for solving nonhomogeneous differential equations, allowing solutions to be expressed as sums over these orthogonal functions, simplifying calculations.
Nonhomogeneous Differential Equations and their Solutions
A nonhomogeneous differential equation includes a term not involving the function or its derivatives, introducing a 'forcing' aspect through an arbitrary function, \( f(x) \). The task is to discover a solution satisfying the original equation plus this additional driving force.

The general form includes terms like:
\[ -(x y')' = \mu x y + f(x) \], with given boundary conditions.
In this context, a formal solution involves expressing \( y(x) \) as a series of eigenfunctions, \( \phi_n(x) \), adding coefficients altering their individual amplitudes based on the function \( f(x) \).
  • We use orthogonality, calculating coefficients \( c_n \) via
    \[ c_n = \frac{\int_0^1 x \phi_n(x) f(x) \ dx}{\int_0^1 x \phi_n^2(x) \ dx} \].

  • This transforms our specific problem into a superposition of those eigenfunctions, effectively tackling the nonhomogeneous aspect.

Solving such equations extends into fields where systems are influenced by external forces, importantly in physics and engineering.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that it is desired to construct a set of polynomials \(f_{0}(x), f_{1}(x), f_{2}(x), \ldots,\) \(f_{k}(x), \ldots,\) where \(f_{k}(x)\) is of degree \(k,\) that are orthonormal on the interval \(0 \leq x \leq 1\) That is, the set of polynomials must satisfy $$ \left(f_{j}, f_{k}\right)=\int_{0}^{1} f_{j}(x) f_{k}(x) d x=\delta_{j k} $$ (a) Find \(f_{0}(x)\) by choosing the polynomial of degree zero such that \(\left(f_{0}, f_{0}\right)=1 .\) (b) Find \(f_{1}(x)\) by determining the polynomial of degree one such that \(\left(f_{0}, f_{1}\right)=0\) and \(\left(f_{1}, f_{1}\right)=1\) (c) Find \(f_{2}(x)\) (d) The normalization condition \(\left(f_{k}, f_{k}\right)=1\) is somewhat awkward to apply. Let \(g_{0}(x)\) \(g_{1}(x), \ldots, g_{k}(x), \ldots\) be the sequence of polynomials that are orthogonal on \(0 \leq x \leq 1\) and that are normalized by the condition \(g_{k}(1)=1 .\) Find \(g_{0}(x), g_{1}(x),\) and \(g_{2}(x)\) and compare them with \(f_{0}(x), f_{1}(x),\) and \(f_{2}(x) .\)

Determine a formal eigenfunction series expansion for the solution of the given problem. Assume that \(f\) satisfies the conditions of Theorem \(11.3 .1 .\) State the values of \(\mu\) for which the solution exists. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\mu y=-f(x), \quad y^{\prime}(0)=0, \quad y^{\prime}(1)+y(1)=0 $$

In the spherical coordinates \(\rho, \theta, \phi(\rho>0,0 \leq \theta<2 \pi, 0 \leq \phi \leq \pi)\) defined by the equations $$ x=\rho \cos \theta \sin \phi, \quad y=\rho \sin \theta \sin \phi, \quad z=\rho \cos \phi $$ Laplace's equation is $$ \rho^{2} u_{\rho \rho}+2 \rho u_{\rho}+\left(\csc ^{2} \phi\right) u_{\theta \theta}+u_{\phi \phi}+(\cot \phi) u_{\phi}=0 $$ (a) Show that if \(u(\rho, \theta, \phi)=\mathrm{P}(\rho) \Theta(\theta) \Phi(\phi),\) then \(\mathrm{P}, \Theta,\) and \(\Phi\) satisfy ordinary differential equations of the form $$ \begin{aligned} \rho^{2} \mathrm{P}^{\prime \prime}+2 \rho \mathrm{P}^{\prime}-\mu^{2} \mathrm{P} &=0 \\ \Theta^{\prime \prime}+\lambda^{2} \Theta &=0 \\\\\left(\sin ^{2} \phi\right) \Phi^{\prime \prime}+(\sin \phi \cos \phi) \Phi^{\prime}+\left(\mu^{2} \sin ^{2} \phi-\lambda^{2}\right) \Phi &=0 \end{aligned} $$ The first of these equations is of the Euler type, while the third is related to Legendre's equation. (b) Show that if \(u(\rho, \theta, \phi)\) is independent of \(\theta,\) then the first equation in part (a) is unchanged, the second is omitted, and the third becomes $$ \left(\sin ^{2} \phi\right) \Phi^{\prime \prime}+(\sin \phi \cos \phi) \Phi^{\prime}+\left(\mu^{2} \sin ^{2} \phi\right) \Phi=0 $$ (c) Show that if a new independent variable is defined by \(s=\cos \phi\), then the equation for \(\Phi\) in part (b) becomes $$ \left(1-s^{2}\right) \frac{d^{2} \Phi}{d s^{2}}-2 s \frac{d \Phi}{d s}+\mu^{2} \Phi=0, \quad-1 \leq s \leq 1 $$ Note that this is Legendre's equation.

Determine whether there is any value of the constant \(a\) for which the problem has a solution. Find the solution for each such value. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\pi^{2} y=a, \quad y^{\prime}(0)=0, \quad y^{\prime}(1)=0 $$

The method of eigenfunction expansions is often useful for nonhomogeneous problems related to the wave equation or its generalizations. Consider the problem $$ r(x) u_{u}=\left[p(x) u_{x}\right]_{x}-q(x) u+F(x, t) $$ $$ \begin{aligned} u_{x}(0, t)-h_{1} u(0, t)=0, & u_{x}(1, t)+h_{2} u(1, t)=0 \\\ u(x, 0)=f(x), & u_{t}(x, 0)=g(x) \end{aligned} $$ This problem can arise in connection with generalizations of the telegraph equation (Problem 16 in Section 11.1 ) or the longitudinal vibrations of an elastic bar (Problem 25 in Section \(11.1) .\) (a) Let \(u(x, t)=X(x) T(t)\) in the homogeneous equation corresponding to Eq. (i) and show that \(X(x)\) satisfies Eqs. ( 28) and ( 29) of the text. Let \(\lambda_{n}\) and \(\phi_{n}(x)\) denote the eigenvalues and normalized eigenfunctions of this problem. (b) Assume that \(u(x, t)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_{n}(t) \phi_{n}(x),\) and show that \(b_{n}(t)\) must satisfy the initial value problem $$ b_{n}^{\prime \prime}(t)+\lambda_{n} b_{n}(t)=\gamma_{n}(t), \quad b_{n}(0)=\alpha_{n}, \quad b_{n}^{\prime}(0)=\beta_{n} $$ where \(\alpha_{n}, \beta_{n},\) and \(\gamma_{n}(t)\) are the expansion coefficients for \(f(x), g(x),\) and \(F(x, t) / r(x)\) in terms of the eigenfunctions \(\phi_{1}(x), \ldots, \phi_{n}(x), \ldots\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free