Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

determine whether the given boundary value problem is self-adjoint. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+\lambda y=0, \quad y(0)=0, \quad y(\pi)+y^{\prime}(\pi)=0 $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the given boundary value problem is self-adjoint since its ODE is already in self-adjoint form and its boundary conditions are also in self-adjoint form.

Step by step solution

01

Transform the ODE to the self-adjoint form if needed.

The given ODE is already in the self-adjoint form: $$ \frac{d}{dx} \left[ 1 \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} \right] + 0 \cdot \frac{dy}{dx} + \lambda y = 0 \Rightarrow y'' + \lambda y = 0. $$
02

Check if the given boundary conditions are self-adjoint.

The given boundary conditions for the problem are: $$ y(0) = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad y(\pi) + y'(\pi) = 0. $$ These boundary conditions can be written as $$ 1 \cdot y(0) + 0 \cdot y'(0) = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad 1 \cdot y(\pi) + 1 \cdot y'(\pi) = 0. $$ They are both in the self-adjoint form: $$ \alpha_1 y(a) + \alpha_2 y'(a) = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad \beta_1 y(b) + \beta_2 y'(b) = 0. $$ Since the given ODE is already in self-adjoint form and the boundary conditions are also self-adjoint, the given boundary value problem is self-adjoint.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each of Problems I through 6 state whether the given boundary value problem is homogeneous or non homogeneous. $$ y^{\prime \prime}+4 y=0, \quad y(-1)=0, \quad y(1)=0 $$

In this problem we show that pointwise convergence of a sequence \(S_{n}(x)\) does not imply mean convergence, and conversely. (a) Let \(S_{n}(x)=n \sqrt{x} e^{-n x^{2} / 2}, 0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Show that \(S_{n}(x) \rightarrow 0\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty\) for each \(x\) in \(0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Show also that $$ R_{n}=\int_{0}^{1}\left[0-S_{n}(x)\right]^{2} d x=\frac{n}{2}\left(1-e^{-n}\right) $$ and hence that \(R_{n} \rightarrow \infty\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty .\) Thus pointwise convergence does not imply mean convergence. (b) Let \(S_{n}(x)=x^{n}\) for \(0 \leq x \leq 1\) and let \(f(x)=0\) for \(0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Show that $$ R_{n}=\int_{0}^{1}\left[f(x)-S_{n}(x)\right]^{2} d x=\frac{1}{2 n+1} $$ and hence \(S_{n}(x)\) converges to \(f(x)\) in the mean. Also show that \(S_{n}(x)\) does not converge to \(f(x)\) pointwise throughout \(0 \leq x \leq 1 .\) Thus mean convergence does not imply pointwise convergence.

Use eigenfunction expansions to find the solution of the given boundary value problem. $$ \begin{array}{ll}{u_{t}=u_{x x}-x,} & {u(0, t)=0, \quad u_{x}(1, t)=0, \quad u(x, 0)=\sin (\pi x / 2)} \\ {\text { see Problem } 2}\end{array} $$

Consider the boundary value problem $$ r(x) u_{t}=\left[p(x) u_{x}\right]_{x}-q(x) u+F(x) $$ $$ u(0, t)=T_{1}, \quad u(1, t)=T_{2}, \quad u(x, 0)=f(x) $$ (a) Let \(v(x)\) be a solution of the problem $$ \left[p(x) v^{\prime}\right]-q(x) v=-F(x), \quad v(0)=T_{1}, \quad v(1)=T_{2} $$ If \(w(x, t)=u(x, t)-v(x),\) find the boundary value problem satisfied by \(w\), Note that this problem can be solved by the method of this section. (b) Generalize the procedure of part (a) to the case \(u\) satisfies the boundary conditions $$ u_{x}(0, t)-h_{1} u(0, t)=T_{1}, \quad u_{x}(1, t)+h_{2} u(1, t)=T_{2} $$

State whether the given boundary value problem is homogeneous or non homogeneous. $$ -y^{\prime \prime}=\lambda\left(1+x^{2}\right) y, \quad y(0)=0, \quad y^{\prime}(1)+3 y(1)=0 $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free