Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that if \(G\) is a weighted graph with distinct edgeweights, then for every simple circuit of \(G\), the edge of maximum weight in this circuit does not belong to anyminimum spanning tree of \(G\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

The edge of maximum weight in some circuit of a weighted graph cannot be included in the minimum spanning tree of the graph.

Step by step solution

01

Definition

A minimum spanning tree of a weighted graph \(G\) is a spanning tree of \(G\) with minimal weight.

Given: \(G\) is a connected undirected weighted graph

\(G\)has distinct edge weights

\(C\)is a simple circuit in \(G\)

\(T\) is a minimum spanning tree of \(G\)

02

Proof by contradiction

To proof: The edge of maximum weight in \(C\) does not belong to \(T\)

Let the edge of maximum weight in \(C\)be\({\bf{e = \{ u,v\} }}\)and let \(e\) belong to \(T\).

Let \({\bf{T' = T - \{ e\} }}\). \({\bf{T''}}\) is then a forest with \(2\) connected components.

Let \(f\) be the edge in the path \({\bf{C - \{ e\} }}\) that is used to "jump" between the \(2\) connected components (this edge has to exists, as \(C\) was a circuit). \(f\) is not an edge in \(T\) (because else \(T\) would contain a circuit).

Since \(e\) is the edge in \(C\) with maximum weight and since \(G\) has distinct edge weights, \(e\) has a larger weight than \(f\)

\(w(e){\bf{ > }}w(f)\)

03

Weight of edge

Let \(T''{\bf{ = }}T \cup \{ f\} {\bf{ - }}\{ e\} \), then the weight of \({\bf{T''}}\) is less than or equal to the weight of \(T\) since \(w(e){\bf{ > }}w(f)\)

\(w(T''){\bf{ < }}w(T)\)

Thus \({\bf{T''}}\) is then a spanning tree with a smaller weight than \(T\). However as \(T\) was the minimum spanning tree, there should not exist a spanning tree with a lower weight and thus we have derived a contradiction. This means that the assumption that \(e\) belongs to \(T\) was wrong (and thus \(e\) cannot belong to \(T\)).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Three couples arrive at the bank of a river. Each of the wives is jealous and does not trust her husband when he is with one of the other wives (and perhaps with other people), but not with her. How can six people cross to the other side of the river using a boat that can hold no more than two people so that no husband is alone with a woman other than his wife? Use a graph theory model.

Answer these questions about the rooted tree illustrated.

  1. Which vertex is the root\(?\)
  2. Which vertices are internal\(?\)
  3. Which vertices are leaves\(?\)
  4. Which vertices are children of \({\bf{j}}\)\(?\)
  5. Which vertex is the parent of \({\bf{h}}\)\(?\)
  6. Which vertices are siblings of \({\bf{o}}\)\(?\)
  7. Which vertices are ancestors of \({\bf{m}}\)\(?\)
  8. Which vertices are descendants of \({\bf{b}}\)\(?\)

How many comparisons are needed to locate or to addeach of these wordsin the search tree for Exercise 1, starting fresh each time?

a) pear

b) banana

c) kumquat

d) orange

Show that every tree can be colored using two colors. The rooted Fibonacci trees \({\bf{Tn}}\) are defined recursively in the following way. \({\bf{T1}}\)and\({\bf{T}}2\) are both the rooted tree consisting of a single vertex, and for \({\bf{n = 3, 4,}}...{\bf{,}}\) the rooted tree \({\bf{Tn}}\) is constructed from a root with \({\bf{Tn - }}1\) as its left subtree and \({\bf{Tn - 2}}\) as its right subtree.

Show that any well-formed formula in prefix notation over a set of symbols and a set of binary operators contains exactly one more symbol than the number of operators.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free