Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(P \left( {x, y} \right)\) be a propositional function. Show that \(\exists x\forall y P \left( {x, y} \right) \to \forall y\exists x P \left( {x, y} \right)\) is a tautology.

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(\exists x\forall y P \left( {x, y} \right) \to \forall y\exists x P \left( {x, y} \right)\) is a tautology.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

A tautology is a logical argument that has the same conclusion as the premise.

02

Prove for tautology

Let us assume the hypothesis that \(\exists x\forall y P \left( {x, y} \right) \to \forall y\exists x P \left( {x, y} \right)\) is a tautology.

This means that there is some\({x_0}\) such that\(P\left( {{x_0},y} \right)\) holds for all y.

Then it is certainly true that for all y there exists an x such that \(P\left( {x,y} \right)\) is true, since each case we can take\(x = {x_0}\).

Hence, proved

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Construct a truth table for each of these compound propositions.

a) (pโˆจq)โˆจr

b) (pโˆจq)โˆงr

c) (pโˆงq)โˆจr

d)(pโˆงq)โˆจr

e) (pโˆจq)โˆงยฌr

f)(pโˆงr)โˆจยฌr


Let P(x),Q(x),R(x)andS(x)be the statements โ€œxis a baby,โ€ โ€œxis logical,โ€ โ€œxis able to manage a crocodile,โ€ and โ€œxis despised,โ€ respectively. Suppose that the domain consists of all people. Express each of these statements using quantifiers; logical connectives; andP(x),Q(x),R(x)andS(x).

a) Babies are illogical.

b) Nobody is despised who can manage a crocodile.

c) Illogical persons are despised.

d) Babies cannot manage crocodiles.

e) Does (d) follow from (a), (b), and (c)? If not, is there a correct conclusion?

Show that the logical equivalences in Table 6, except for the double negation law, come in pairs, where each pair contains compound propositions that are duals of each other.

Construct a combinatorial circuit using inverters, OR gates, and AND gates that produces the output(pโˆงยฌr)โˆจ(ยฌqโˆงr)from input bitsand p,q,r

Let P(x),Q(x),and R(x)be the statements โ€œxis a clear explanation,โ€ โ€œxis satisfactory,โ€ and โ€œxis an excuse,โ€ respectively. Suppose that the domain for x consists of all English text. Express each of these statements using quantifiers, logical connectives, and P(x),Q(x),and R(x).

a) All clear explanations are satisfactory.

b) Some excuses are unsatisfactory.

c) Some excuses are not clear explanations.

d) Does (c) follow from (a) and (b)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free