Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that¬p(qr) and q(pr)are logically equivalent

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is shown that ¬p(qr)and q(pr) are equivalent logically.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Logical equivalence

Logical equivalence is a relationship between two statements in propositional logic.

02

The two statements are logically equivalent

We solve the given expression,

¬q(qr)=p(qr)=p(qr)=¬q(pr)..............[Associativityandcommutativity]=q(pr)

Thus, ¬p(qr)and q(pr)are logically equivalent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let P(x),Q(x),R(x)andS(x)be the statements “xis a baby,” “xis logical,” “xis able to manage a crocodile,” and “xis despised,” respectively. Suppose that the domain consists of all people. Express each of these statements using quantifiers; logical connectives; andP(x),Q(x),R(x)andS(x).

a) Babies are illogical.

b) Nobody is despised who can manage a crocodile.

c) Illogical persons are despised.

d) Babies cannot manage crocodiles.

e) Does (d) follow from (a), (b), and (c)? If not, is there a correct conclusion?

Let P(x),Q(x),R(x),andS(x) be the statements “xis a duck,” “xis one of my poultry,” “xis an officer,” and “xis willing to waltz,” respectively. Express each of these statements using quantifiers; logical connectives; andP(x),Q(x),R(x),andS(x).

(a) No ducks are willing to waltz.

(b) No officers ever decline to waltz.

(c) All my poultry are ducks.

(d) My poultry are not officers.

(e) Does (d) follow from (a), (b), and (c)? If not, is there a correct conclusion?

A says “We are both knaves” and B says nothing. Exercises 24–31 relate to inhabitants of an island on which there are three kinds of people: knights who always tell the truth, knaves who always lie, and spies (called normals by Sullying [Sm78]) who can either lie or tell the truth. You encounter three people, A, B, and C. You know one of these people is a knight, one is a knave, and one is a spy. Each of the three people knows the type of person each of other two is. For each of these situations, if possible, determine whether there is a unique solution and determine who the knave, knight, and spy are. When there is no unique solution, list all possible solutions or state that there are no solutions

A says “I am not the spy,” B says “I am not the spy,” and C says “I am not the spy.”

A says “We are both knaves” and B says nothing. Exercises 24–31 relate to inhabitants of an island on which there are three kinds of people: knights who always tell the truth, knaves who always lie, and spies (called normals by Smullyan [Sm78]) who can either lie or tell the truth. You encounter three people, A, B, and C. You know one of these people is a knight, one is a knave, and one is a spy. Each of the three people knows the type of person each of other two is. For each of these situations, if possible, determine whether there is a unique solution and determine who the knave, knight, and spy are. When there is no unique solution, list all possible solutions or state that there are no solutions.

A says “I am the knave,” B says “I am the knave,” and C says “I am the knave.”

Suppose that a truth table in propositional variables is specified. Show that a compound proposition with this truth table can be formed by taking the disjunction of conjunctions of the variables or their negations, with one conjunction included for each combination of values for which the compound proposition is true. The resulting compound proposition is said to be in disjunctive normal form

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free