Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20



Show that each of these conditional statements is a tautology by using truth tables.

(a) [¬p(pq]q

(b) [(pq)(qr)](pr)

(c) [p(pq)]q

(d) [(pq)(pr)(qr)]r

Short Answer

Expert verified

For showing the given conditional statement is a tautology, it is proved that the outcome of these statements in a truth table contains an onlyTvalue.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Truth Tables  

A logic gatetruth table depicts each feasible input sequence to the gate or circuit, as well as the resulting output based on the combination of these inputs.

02

To Show conditional statement is a tautology using a truth table

(a) [¬p(pq)]q

Prepare the truth table for [¬p(pq)]q.

pqlocalid="1668170251222" ¬p
localid="1668170264238" pq
localid="1668170278223" ¬p(pq)
[¬p(pq)]q
TTFTFT
TFFTFT
FTTTTT
FFTFFT

Truth Table

The conditional statement [¬p(pq)]qis a tautology as the output of the truth table consists of only T.

(b) [(pq)(qr)](pr)

Prepare the truth table for [(pq)(qr)](pr).

pqr(pq)
(qr)
(pq)(qr)
(pr)
[(pq)(qr)](pr)
TTTTTTTT
TTFTFFFT
TFTFTFTT
TFFFTFFT
FTTTTTTT
FTFTFFTT
FFTTTTTT
FFFTTTTT

Truth Table

The conditional statement localid="1668173717311" [(pq)(qr)](pr)is a tautology as the output of the truth table consists of only T.

(c) [p(pq)]q

Prepare the truth table for [p(pq)]q

pqpq
p(pq)
¬p(pq)
TTTTT
TFFFT
FTTFT
FFTFT

Truth Table

The conditional statement [p(pq)]qis a tautology as the output of the truth table consists of only T.

(d) [(pq)(pr)(qr)]r

Prepare the truth table for localid="1668174934663" [(pq)(pr)(qr)]r .

SupposeE=[(pq)(pr)(qr)]r

pqr(pq)
(pr)
(qr)
(pq)(pr)
(pq)(pr)(qr)
E
TTTTTTTTT
TTFTFFFTT
TFTFTFTTT
TFFFTFFTT
FTTTTTTTT
FTFTFFTTT
FFTTTTTTT
FFFTTTTTT

Truth Table

The conditional statement [(pq)(pr)(qr)]ris a tautology as the output of the truth table consists of onlyT.

Therefore, it has been shown that the given conditional statements are tautologies using truth tables.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let P(x),Q(x),R(x),andS(x) be the statements “xis a duck,” “xis one of my poultry,” “xis an officer,” and “xis willing to waltz,” respectively. Express each of these statements using quantifiers; logical connectives; andP(x),Q(x),R(x),andS(x).

(a) No ducks are willing to waltz.

(b) No officers ever decline to waltz.

(c) All my poultry are ducks.

(d) My poultry are not officers.

(e) Does (d) follow from (a), (b), and (c)? If not, is there a correct conclusion?

Suppose that a truth table in propositional variables is specified. Show that a compound proposition with this truth table can be formed by taking the disjunction of conjunctions of the variables or their negations, with one conjunction included for each combination of values for which the compound proposition is true. The resulting compound proposition is said to be in disjunctive normal form

The police have three suspects for the murder of Mr. Cooper: Mr. Smith, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Williams. Smith, Jones, and Williams each declare that they did not kill Cooper. Smith also states that Cooper was a friend of Jones and that Williams disliked him. Jones also states that he did not know Cooper and that he was out of town the day Cooper was killed. Williams also states that he saw both Smith and Jones with Cooper the day of the killing and that either Smith or Jones must have killed him. Can you determine who the murderer was if

a) One of the three men is guilty, the two innocent men are telling the truth, but the statements of the guilty man may or may not be true?

b) Innocent men do not lie?

What is the negation of each of these propositions?

a) Jennifer and Teja are friends.

b) There are 13items in a baker’s dozen.

c) Abby sent more than100text messages every day.

d) 121is a perfect square.

Use truth tables to verify these equivalences

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free