Chapter 4: Problem 51
Solve the exponential equation algebraically. Approximate the result to three decimal places.\(e^{2 x}-3 e^{x}-4=0\)
Short Answer
Expert verified
The approximate solution to the equation \(e^{2 x}-3 e^{x}-4=0\) is \(x = 1.386\)
Step by step solution
01
Transformation
The equation \(e^{2 x}-3 e^{x}-4=0\) can be arranged in quadratic form if we let \(y = e^{x}\). This simplifies the equation to: \(y^2 - 3y - 4 = 0\).
02
Solving the quadratic equation
We can solve the quadratic equation by using the quadratic formula \(y = [-b ± sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)] / (2a)\). Applying this formula, we find that \(y1 = 4\) and \(y2 = -1\).
03
Back-substitution
Now that we have our 'y' values, we substitute them back into the original substitution \(y = e^{x}\), to find x. This gives us: \(x = ln(y)\), and with \(y1 = 4\) and \(y2= -1\), we get two cases. Remembering that the logarithm of any negative number is undefined, only \(x = ln(4)\) gives us meaningful result.
04
Calculating result
We now calculate the value of \(x = ln(4)\), which is approximately \(x = 1.386\), when rounded to three decimal places.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Algebraic Solving Methods
When facing exponential equations, algebraic solving methods are a great tool, as they provide a structured way to isolate the variable of interest. The key is to transform or simplify complex equations into more manageable forms. Here's how you can approach it:
- Identifying the structure: Recognize patterns that would help reduce the equation into a simpler form. Look for ways to convert exponential terms into algebraic ones using substitutions.
- Substitution Method: For the equation \(e^{2x} - 3e^x - 4 = 0\), we used substitution. By letting \(y = e^x\), the equation turns into a quadratic equation, \(y^2 - 3y - 4 = 0\). This is a powerful way to handle complex exponents.
- Solving the simplified equation: Once transformed, the problem becomes one of solving a familiar quadratic equation. This method not only simplifies things but also makes it easier to retrieve the original variable by back substitution.
Quadratic Equations
Quadratic equations frequently appear when solving algebraic problems that involve square terms. A quadratic equation has the form \(ax^2 + bx + c = 0\), and can be solved using various methods:
- Quadratic Formula: This formula \(x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}\) allows us to solve any quadratic equation by simply substituting the coefficients \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\).
- Factoring: This involves expressing the quadratic equation as a product of its roots. It is efficient but not always applicable, especially if the roots aren't integers or rational numbers.
- Completing the Square: This method reconfigures the equation to make the variable easier to isolate. Although more involved, this technique can offer insights into the properties of quadratic equations.
Natural Logarithms
Natural logarithms, denoted as \(\ln\), are essential in dealing with exponential equations, especially when trying to solve for unknown exponents. They are the inverse of the exponential function with base \(e\), the natural constant, approximately equal to 2.71828. Here's how they work:
- Properties of Natural Logarithms: Understanding its properties, such as \(\ln(e^x) = x\) and \(e^{\ln(x)} = x\), is crucial. These properties allow us to transition seamlessly between exponential and logarithmic forms.
- Using \(\ln\) in Solving Equations: In the exercise, after finding the possible values of \(y\) from the quadratic equation, back-substitution with the formula \(x = \ln(y)\) was used to find \(x\). For example, \(x = \ln(4)\) calculated to approximately 1.386.
- Handling Undefined Logarithms: It's important to remember that \(\ln\) of a negative or zero value is undefined, which was why \(y = -1\) was disregarded in the solution.