Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

\(\sqrt[3]{998}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The cube root of 998 is approximately 9.993327.

Step by step solution

01

Initialize and Estimate

Start by identifying a number that when cubed comes close to 998. A good starting guess would be 10 because 10^3 is 1000 which is very close to 998.
02

Refine Your Estimate Using Newton's Method

Newton's Method is a way to quickly find more accurate roots of functions. Here, the iterative formula will be \(x1 = x0 - (x0^3 - n) / (3x0^2)\) where \(x0\) is the initial guess (10 in this case) and \(n\) is 998. For the first iteration, \(x1 = 10 - (10^3 - 998) / (3 * 10^2)\), which results in 9.993333, which is the refined estimate.
03

Repeat Step 2 until Convergence

Repeat the process in Step 2 using the new value from the previous iteration. For example in the second iteration, \(x2 = 9.993333 - (9.993333^3 - 998) / (3 * 9.993333^2)\) . Continue until the value changes very little or not at all between iterations, indicating convergence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cubic Root Approximation
Calculating the cubic root of a number, like \(\sqrt[3]{998}\), may pose a challenge without the use of a calculator. However, an effective method to approximate this value is by using an iteration technique known as Newton's Method.

Let's begin by understanding the basic premise of a cubic root. When you calculate the cubic root of a number, you're looking for a value that, when multiplied by itself three times (cubed), gives the original number. For instance, the cubic root of 8 is 2, because \(2 \times 2 \times 2 = 8\).

In our exercise, a simple estimation is used as the initial guess. The choice of 10 is logical since \(10^3 = 1000\), which is near our target number, 998. This method of estimation is crucial as it sets the stage for the iterative process, improving accuracy with each step while being time-efficient.
Iterative Methods for Roots
Newton's Method is a shining example of an iterative method used for finding roots of real numbers, and it is particularly useful for finding square roots, cubic roots, and roots of other non-linear functions. An iterative method is one that involves repetition: you start with an initial approximation and then refine it using a set formula or process.

In the context of our exercise, after starting with an initial guess, the method applies the formula \(x_{i+1} = x_i - \frac{x_i^3 - n}{3x_i^2}\) repetitively. Each repetition, referred to as an iteration, refines the estimate of the cubic root. In essence, with every iteration, you're edging closer to the actual cubic root by correcting the previous estimation using the behavior of the function's curve.

Because of its speed and efficiency, iterative methods like Newton's are widely used in computational mathematics and scientific computation where approximate solutions are sufficient, and exact arithmetic can be computationally intensive.
Convergence in Numerical Methods
In numerical analysis, convergence is a key concept that describes how close a sequence of approximations gets to the exact solution. For an iterative method to be effective, the sequence generated by the iterative process must converge to the actual root. If the method does not converge, we either diverge away from the solution or oscillate around it without getting closer.

In our case, we seek to find when the values of successive iterations of Newton's Method for \(\sqrt[3]{998}\) change very little or remain constant, indicating that we have 'converged' on an approximation close enough to the true value. To ensure convergence, the initial guess must be chosen wisely and the function well-behaved in the vicinity of that guess.

Convergence in numerical methods is essential for efficiency and accuracy. It avoids excessive computation by signaling when an approximation is sufficiently close to the true value, thus saving computational resources and time while providing an ample degree of precision for practical purposes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Production Level Suppose \(c(x)=x^{3}-20 x^{2}+20,000 x\) is the cost of manufacturing \(x\) items. Find a production level that will minimize the average cost of making \(x\) items.

Motion on a Line The positions of two particles on the \(s\) -axis are \(s_{1}=\sin t\) and \(s_{2}=\sin (t+\pi / 3),\) with \(s_{1}\) and \(s_{2}\) in meters and \(t\) in seconds. (a) At what time \((\mathrm{s})\) in the interval \(0 \leq t \leq 2 \pi\) do the particles meet? (b) What is the farthest apart that the particles ever get? (c) When in the interval \(0 \leq t \leq 2 \pi\) is the distance between the particles changing the fastest?

Group Activity In Exercises \(39-42,\) sketch a graph of a differentiable function \(y=f(x)\) that has the given properties. $$\begin{array}{l}{\text { A local minimum value that is greater than one of its local maxi- }} \\ {\text { mum values. }}\end{array}$$

Calculus and Geometry How close does the curve \(y=\sqrt{x}\) come to the point \((3 / 2,0) ?[\)Hint: If you minimize the square of the distance, you can avoid square roots.

Stiffness of a Beam The stiffness S of a rectangular beam is proportional to its width times the cube of its depth. (a) Find the dimensions of the stiffest beam that can be cut from a 12-in. diameter cylindrical log. (b) Writing to Learn Graph \(S\) as a function of the beam's width \(w,\) assuming the proportionality constant to be \(k=1 .\) Reconcile what you see with your answer in part (a). (c) Writing to Learn On the same screen, graph \(S\) as a function of the beam's depth \(d,\) again taking \(k=1 .\) Compare the graphs with one another and with your answer in part (a). What would be the effect of changing to some other value of \(k ?\) Try it.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free