Chapter 3: Problem 59
Leibniz's Proof of the Product Rule Here's how Leibniz explained the Product Rule in a letter to his colleague John Wallis: It is useful to consider quantities infinitely small such that when their ratio is sought, they may not be considered zero, but which are rejected as often as they occur with quantities incomparably greater. Thus if we have \(x+d x, d x\) is rejected. Similarly we cannot have \(x d x\) and \(d x d x\) standing together, as \(x d x\) is incomparably greater than \(d x d x\) . Hence if we are to differentiate \(u v,\) we write $$\begin{aligned} d(u v) &=(u+d u)(v+d v)-u v \\ &=u v+v d u+u d v+d u d v-u v \\ &=v d u+u d v \end{aligned}$$ Answer the following questions about Leibniz's proof. (a) What does Leibniz mean by a quantity being rejected? (b) What happened to dudv in the last step of Leibniz's proof? (c) Divide both sides of Leibniz's formula $$d(u v)=v d u+u d v$$ by the differential \(d x .\) What formula results? (d) Why would the critics of Leibniz's time have objected to dividing both sides of the equation by \(d x ?\) (e) Leibniz had a similar simple (but not-so-clean) proof of the Quotient Rule. Can you reconstruct it?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.