Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Resistors in parallel Two resistors in an electrical circuit with resistance \(R_{1}\) and \(R_{2}\) wired in parallel with a constant voltage give an effective resistance of \(R,\) where \(\frac{1}{R}=\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{2}}\). (Check your book to see figure) a. Find \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{1}}\) and \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{2}}\) by solving for \(R\) and differentiating. b. Find \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{1}}\) and \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{2}}\) by differentiating implicitly. c. Describe how an increase in \(R_{1}\) with \(R_{2}\) constant affects \(R\) d. Describe how a decrease in \(R_{2}\) with \(R_{1}\) constant affects \(R\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: When R_1 increases while R_2 remains constant, the effective resistance R increases. When R_2 decreases while R_1 remains constant, the effective resistance R decreases.

Step by step solution

01

Part a: Solving for R and differentiating explicitly

To differentiate \(R\) with respect to \(R_1\) and \(R_2\), we first need to solve the equation \(\frac{1}{R}=\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{2}}\) for \(R\). 1. Find a common denominator for the right-hand side of the equation: \(\frac{1}{R}=\frac{R_{1}+R_{2}}{R_{1}R_{2}}\) 2. Invert both sides of the equation to get \(R\) by itself: \(R = \frac{R_{1}R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}\) Now we can take the partial derivatives with respect to \(R_1\) and \(R_2\):
02

Part a: Derivative with respect to R_1

Differentiate \(\frac{R_{1}R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}\) with respect to \(R_1\) using the quotient rule: \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{1}} = \frac{(R_{1} + R_{2})(R_{2}) - (R_{1}R_{2})(1)}{(R_{1} + R_{2})^2} = \frac{R_{2}^2}{(R_{1}+R_{2})^2}\)
03

Part a: Derivative with respect to R_2

Differentiate \(\frac{R_{1}R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}\) with respect to \(R_2\) using the quotient rule: \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{2}} = \frac{(R_{1} + R_{2})(R_{1}) - (R_{1}R_{2})(1)}{(R_{1} + R_{2})^2} = \frac{R_{1}^2}{(R_{1}+R_{2})^2}\)
04

Part b: Differentiating implicitly

Now let's find the partial derivatives of R with respect to \(R_{1}\) and \(R_{2}\) by differentiating implicitly. We start with the original equation \(\frac{1}{R}=\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{2}}\).
05

Part b: Implicit derivative with respect to R_1

Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to \(R_1\), treating \(R, R_1, R_2\) as functions of \(R_1\), and solve for \(-\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_1}\): \(\frac{-\partial R/\partial R_1}{R^2} = \frac{-1}{R_1^2} \Rightarrow \frac{\partial R}{\partial R_1} = \frac{R^2}{R_1^2}\) Replace \(R\) with the expression found in part a: \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_1} = \frac{(R_1R_2/(R_1+R_2))^2}{R_1^2} = \frac{R_2^2}{(R_1+R_2)^2}\)
06

Part b: Implicit derivative with respect to R_2

Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to \(R_2\), treating \(R, R_1, R_2\) as functions of \(R_2\), and solve for \(-\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_2}\): \(\frac{-\partial R/\partial R_2}{R^2} = \frac{-1}{R_2^2} \Rightarrow \frac{\partial R}{\partial R_2} = \frac{R^2}{R_2^2}\) Replace \(R\) with the expression found in part a: \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_2} = \frac{(R_1R_2/(R_1+R_2))^2}{R_2^2} = \frac{R_1^2}{(R_1+R_2)^2}\) Since the results match with those from part a, we have successfully found the partial derivatives by using implicit differentiation.
07

c. Effect on R of increasing R_1

Now we will examine how an increase in \(R_1\) with \(R_2\) constant affects \(R\). We can analyze this based on the partial derivative with respect to \(R_1\), which is: \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_1} = \frac{R_2^2}{(R_1+R_2)^2}\) This expression is positive (assuming \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) are positive), which means that as \(R_1\) increases, \(R\) also increases. Thus, if \(R_1\) increases while \(R_2\) remains constant, the effective resistance \(R\) increases.
08

d. Effect on R of decreasing R_2

Lastly, we will examine how a decrease in \(R_2\) with \(R_1\) constant affects \(R\). We can analyze this based on the partial derivative with respect to \(R_2\): \(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_2} = \frac{R_1^2}{(R_1+R_2)^2}\) This expression is positive (assuming \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) are positive), which means that as \(R_2\) increases, \(R\) also increases. Thus, if \(R_2\) decreases while \(R_1\) remains constant, the effective resistance \(R\) will also decrease (the opposite effect of increasing \(R_2\)).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Implicit Differentiation
Implicit differentiation is a powerful technique when dealing with equations where variables are tangled, and it is challenging to solve for one variable in terms of others. Instead of isolating one variable, we differentiate everything with respect to the variable of interest.
This technique is handy when we have a function defined by an equation, such as \[ \frac{1}{R} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} \]. Here, it's more complex to express R directly in terms of \(R_1\) or \(R_2\), so we differentiate all parts of the equation.
  • To apply implicit differentiation here, differentiate both sides of the given equation with respect to \(R_1\) or \(R_2\), treating every variable that isn't constant as a function.
  • Remember to apply the chain rule when necessary. For example, the derivative of \( \frac{1}{R_1} \) with respect to \(R_1\) is \( -\frac{1}{R_1^2} \).
  • After differentiating, solve for the partial derivatives, such as \( \frac{\partial R}{\partial R_1} \), which provide insight into how the effective resistance \(R\) changes.
Through implicit differentiation, you can still find how changes in one resistor affect the overall resistance without rearranging the formula for \(R\).
Quotient Rule in Calculus
The quotient rule is used to differentiate functions that are given as one function divided by another. If you have a function in the form \( f(x) = \frac{u(x)}{v(x)} \), the derivative is given by:
\[ f'(x) = \frac{v(x)u'(x) - u(x)v'(x)}{(v(x))^2} \]
where \(u'(x)\) and \(v'(x)\) are derivatives of \(u(x)\) and \(v(x)\).
The exercise to find \( \frac{\partial R}{\partial R_1} \) and \( \frac{\partial R}{\partial R_2} \) involves using this rule, applied to the function \( R = \frac{R_1R_2}{R_1 + R_2} \).
  • For \( \frac{\partial R}{\partial R_1} \), treat \(R_2\) as constant and differentiate the function. The result would be \( \frac{R_2^2}{(R_1 + R_2)^2} \).
  • For \( \frac{\partial R}{\partial R_2} \), treat \(R_1\) as constant and apply the quotient rule similarly, yielding \( \frac{R_1^2}{(R_1 + R_2)^2} \).
Understanding the quotient rule lets you systematically differentiate complex ratios, giving you insight into the relationships between varying quantities.
Parallel Resistors Formula
In circuits, resistors can be combined in different configurations to achieve desired electrical properties. When two resistors are in parallel, the effective or total resistance \(R\) can be determined using the formula:
\[ \frac{1}{R} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} \].
This formula shows that the reciprocal of the total resistance is the sum of the reciprocals of the individual resistances.
  • One key takeaway is that the total resistance of resistors in parallel is always less than the smallest individual resistance. This is because adding more paths for the current to flow actually reduces the overall resistance.
  • This concept can be extended to more than two resistors, where the formula would involve adding the reciprocals of all resistances involved.
Using this formula, if you have a network of resistors, you can determine how changes in any one resistor affect the overall resistance by analyzing the partial derivatives. In the exercise, this understanding helps in predicting the effects of changing \(R_1\) or \(R_2\) on the total resistance \(R\).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Give the value of the utility function at the optimal point. $$U=f(\ell, g)=10 e^{1 / 2} g^{1 / 2} \text { subject to } 3 \ell+6 g=18$$

A baseball pitcher's earned run average (ERA) is \(A(e, i)=9 e / i\), where \(e\) is the number of earned runs given up by the pitcher and \(i\) is the number of innings pitched. Good pitchers have low ERAs. Assume \(e \geq 0\) and \(i>0\) are real numbers. a. The single-season major league record for the lowest ERA was set by Dutch Leonard of the Detroit Tigers in \(1914 .\) During that season, Dutch pitched a total of 224 innings and gave up just 24 earned runs. What was his ERA? b. Determine the ERA of a relief pitcher who gives up 4 earned runs in one- third of an inning. c. Graph the level curve \(A(e, i)=3\) and describe the relationship between \(e\) and \(i\) in this case.

Traveling waves in general Generalize Exercise 79 by considering a set of waves described by the function \(z=A+\sin (a x-b y),\) where \(a, b,\) and \(A\) are real numbers. a. Find the direction in which the crests and troughs of the waves are aligned. Express your answer as a unit vector in terms of \(a\) and \(b\). b. Find the surfer's direction- that is, the direction of steepest descent from a crest to a trough. Express your answer as a unit vector in terms of \(a\) and \(b\).

Find the values of \(K\) and \(L\) that maximize the following production functions subject to the given constraint, assuming \(K \geq 0\) and \(L \geq 0\) Given the production function \(P=f(K, L)=K^{a} L^{1-a}\) and the budget constraint \(p K+q L=B,\) where \(a, p, q,\) and \(B\) are given, show that \(P\) is maximized when \(K=\frac{a B}{p}\) and \(L=\frac{(1-a) B}{q}\)

Potential functions Potential functions arise frequently in physics and engineering. A potential function has the property that a field of interest (for example, an electric field, a gravitational field, or a velocity field) is the gradient of the potential (or sometimes the negative of the gradient of the potential). (Potential functions are considered in depth in Chapter \(17 .)\) The electric field due to a point charge of strength \(Q\) at the origin has a potential function \(\varphi=k Q / r,\) where \(r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\) is the square of the distance between a variable point \(P(x, y, z)\) and the charge, and \(k>0\) is a physical constant. The electric field is given by \(\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi,\) where \(\nabla \varphi\) is the gradient in three dimensions. a. Show that the three-dimensional electric field due to a point charge is given by $$\mathbf{E}(x, y, z)=k Q\left\langle\frac{x}{r^{3}}, \frac{y}{r^{3}}, \frac{z}{r^{3}}\right\rangle$$ b. Show that the electric field at a point has a magnitude \(|\mathbf{E}|=\frac{k Q}{r^{2}} .\) Explain why this relationship is called an inverse square law.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free