Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the sequence \(\left\\{x_{n}\right\\}\) defined for \(n=1,2,3, \ldots\) by $$x_{n}=\sum_{k=n+1}^{2 n} \frac{1}{k}=\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n+2}+\dots+\frac{1}{2 n}.$$ a. Write out the terms \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}\). b. Show that \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_{n}<1,\) for \(n=1,2,3, \ldots\). c. Show that \(x_{n}\) is the right Riemann sum for \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{d x}{x}\) using \(n\) subintervals. d. Conclude that \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{n}=\ln 2\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Calculate and write out the terms \(x_1\), \(x_2\), and \(x_3\) for the sequence \(x_n = \frac{1}{n+1} + \frac{1}{n+2} + \dots + \frac{1}{2n}\). Prove that the inequality \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_n < 1\) holds for all \(n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\) and show that \(x_n\) represents the right Riemann sum for \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{1}{x} dx\) using \(n\) subintervals. Finally, conclude the limit of the sequence. Answer: The terms for the sequence are: \(x_1 = \frac{1}{2}, x_2 = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4}, x_3 = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6}\). The inequality \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_n < 1\) holds for all \(n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\) by induction. The sequence \(x_n\) represents the right Riemann sum for \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{1}{x} dx\) using \(n\) subintervals. As a result, the limit of the sequence is \(\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_n = \ln 2\).

Step by step solution

01

(a) Calculate the terms x1, x2, x3

From the given sum, we can directly calculate the first three terms as follows: \(x_1 = \frac{1}{2}\), \(x_2 = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4}\), \(x_3 = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6}\).
02

(b) Prove the inequality using induction

We will prove the inequality \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_n < 1\) using induction. For the base case, we have already calculated \(x_1 = \frac{1}{2}\), which clearly meets the inequality. Now assume the inequality holds for \(x_k\): \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_k < 1\) for some \(k \ge 1\). We need to prove the inequality holds for \(x_{k+1}\): \(x_{k+1} = \frac{1}{k+2} + \frac{1}{k+3} + \dots + \frac{1}{2(k+1)}\) Notice that for all terms, the denominators are greater than \(k+1\). Therefore, each term on the right-hand side is less than \(\frac{1}{k+1}\), and there are \(k+1\) terms in total. So, \(x_{k+1} < 1\). Now, consider the difference between \(x_{k}\) and \(x_{k+1}\): \(x_{k+1} - x_k = \big( \frac{1}{k+2} + \frac{1}{k+3} + \dots + \frac{1}{2(k+1)} \big) - \big( \frac{1}{k+1} + \frac{1}{k+2} + \dots + \frac{1}{2k} \big)\) The right-hand side simplifies to: \(\frac{1}{k+1} - \frac{1}{2k} = \frac{1}{2(k+1)}\). By induction hypothesis, we have \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_k\), so \(x_{k+1} = x_k + \frac{1}{2(k+1)} > x_k \ge \frac{1}{2}\). Therefore, \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_{k+1} < 1\), and the inequality holds for all \(n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\).
03

(c) Show that xn is the right Riemann sum for the integral

We need to show that \(x_n\) is the right Riemann sum for \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{1}{x} dx\) with \(n\) subintervals. We will partition the interval \([1,2]\) into \(n\) equal subintervals, each of width \(\Delta x = \frac{2-1}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\), so the endpoints of the subintervals are \(1, 1+\frac{1}{n}, 1+\frac{2}{n}, \ldots, 2\). We will choose the right endpoint of each subinterval as the representative point. The right Riemann sum will be: \(R_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i^*) \Delta x_i = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{1+\frac{i}{n}}\). Now, we change the index by redefining \(k = n + i\), which then simplifies the sum: \(R_n = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=n+1}^{2n} \frac{1}{k}\). This sum is precisely the definition of \(x_n\). Therefore, \(x_n\) is the right Riemann sum for \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{dx}{x}\) using \(n\) subintervals.
04

(d) Conclude the limit of the sequence

Now we know that \(x_n\) represents the right Riemann sum for the integral \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{1}{x} dx\). This integral can be calculated as: \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{1}{x} dx = \ln|x| \Big|_1^2 = \ln 2 - \ln 1 = \ln 2\). As \(n\) approaches infinity, the right Riemann sum \(x_n\) gets closer to the actual value of the integral. Therefore, we can conclude that \(\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_n = \ln 2\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Riemann sum
Understanding the concept of a Riemann sum is crucial for analyzing the behavior of sequences and the convergence of series. Think of a Riemann sum like a painter approximating a famous masterpiece with a mosaic. Each tile in the mosaic represents a portion of the integral over a small interval; similarly, each term in a Riemann sum represents the area under a curve over a slice of the domain.

The Riemann sum is a method to approximate the definite integral of a function, denoted as \(\int_a^b f(x)dx\), where \(a\) and \(b\) represent the interval over which we are integrating. The way it works is by dividing the interval \[a,b\] into smaller subintervals, each with a width we can call \(\Delta x\), and then multiplying the function value at certain points within those subintervals (usually left, right, or midpoints) by the width of the subintervals. The sum of all these products gives us a Riemann sum:
\[\sum_{i=1}^n f(c_i)\Delta x_i\]
where \(c_i\) represents the chosen point in the \(i\)-th subinterval. As the number of subintervals increases, and \(\Delta x\) gets smaller, the Riemann sum becomes a better approximation of the true definite integral, and in the case of an infinite number of infinitely small subintervals, it converges to the exact value of the integral.
Sequences and series
Sequences and series are the bread and butter of analysis, providing a foundational language for discussing convergence. A sequence is an ordered list of numbers that can continue indefinitely. We denote a sequence by \(\{a_n\}\), where \(a_n\) represents the \(n\)-th term in the sequence. It can be thought of as a function where the domain is the set of natural numbers, and the range is the set of real numbers associated with each natural number.

When we add the terms of a sequence together, we get a series. In particular, we consider the sum of a sequence:\[\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n\]where we aim to find out whether, as we add more and more terms, the sum approaches a finite number (converges) or grows without bound (diverges). If a series converges, it means the terms of the sequence are getting smaller in such a way that the total sum is a definite, finite number. Understanding whether a series converges or diverges, and what value it converges to if applicable, is a pivotal concept in advanced mathematics, particularly in calculus and analysis.
Limit of a sequence
The limit of a sequence is the value that the terms of the sequence 'approach' as the index \(n\) increases towards infinity. For a sequence \(\{a_n\}\), we denote the limit as:\[\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = L\]
The limit \(L\) can be thought of as the 'target' that the sequence is aiming for. If the terms of the sequence get arbitrarily close to \(L\) as \(n\) becomes very large, we say that the sequence converges to \(L\). However, if the terms do not settle down but continue to grow without bound or oscillate without approaching a particular value, we say that the sequence diverges.

In order to rigorously establish the limit of a sequence, mathematicians use the concept of an epsilon (\(\varepsilon\))-neighborhood. We say that the limit of a sequence equals \(L\) if, for every positive number \(\varepsilon\), there exists a natural number \(N\), such that for all \(n > N\), the distance between \(a_n\) and \(L\) is less than \(\varepsilon\). This precision in definition ensures that limits are not assigned based on approximations or guesses but based on unequivocal mathematical behavior as \(n\) approaches infinity.
Infinite series
An infinite series takes the concept of a sequence to the next level by considering the sum of infinitely many terms. Determining the convergence or divergence of an infinite series is a central question in mathematical analysis. For example, if we are summing the reciprocals of the natural numbers:\[\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n}\]we want to know if adding up these fractions, as \(n\) grows larger and larger, will lead to a number that exists within the real number system, or if the sum will grow without limit. In the case of the series of reciprocals, the sum diverges, growing beyond all bounds.

However, not all infinite series diverge. Some converge to a real number, and this can often represent a profound and surprising result, particularly when the function being summed is complex or not obviously decreasing. In the exercise provided, we're examining the convergence of a series that results in the natural logarithm of 2, which showcases how an infinite series, through the delicate interplay of its terms, can indeed sum to a precise and finite quantity. Understanding and working with infinite series is foundational for calculus, physics, and many other fields of science and engineering where continuous processes are approximated by discrete sums.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following sequences defined by a recurrence relation. Use a calculator, analytical methods, and/or graphing to make a conjecture about the limit of the sequence or state that the sequence diverges. $$a_{n+1}=2 a_{n}\left(1-a_{n}\right) ; a_{0}=0.3$$

Consider the following situations that generate a sequence. a. Write out the first five terms of the sequence. b. Find an explicit formula for the terms of the sequence. c. Find a recurrence relation that generates the sequence. d. Using a calculator or a graphing utility, estimate the limit of the sequence or state that it does not exist. Jack took a \(200-\mathrm{mg}\) dose of a painkiller at midnight. Every hour, \(5 \%\) of the drug is washed out of his bloodstream. Let \(d_{n}\) be the amount of drug in Jack's blood \(n\) hours after the drug was taken, where \(d_{0}=200 \mathrm{mg}\)

Consider the following infinite series. a. Write out the first four terms of the sequence of partial sums. b. Estimate the limit of \(\left\\{S_{n}\right\\}\) or state that it does not exist. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{k}$$

Repeated square roots Consider the expression \(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\cdots}}}},\) where the process continues indefinitely. a. Show that this expression can be built in steps using the recurrence relation \(a_{0}=1, a_{n+1}=\sqrt{1+a_{n}}\), for \(n=0,1,2,3, \ldots . .\) Explain why the value of the expression can be interpreted as \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n},\) provided the limit exists. b. Evaluate the first five terms of the sequence \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\}\) c. Estimate the limit of the sequence. Compare your estimate with \((1+\sqrt{5}) / 2,\) a number known as the golden mean. d. Assuming the limit exists, use the method of Example 5 to determine the limit exactly. e. Repeat the preceding analysis for the expression \(\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p+\cdots}}},}\) where \(p>0 .\) Make a table showing the approximate value of this expression for various values of \(p .\) Does the expression seem to have a limit for all positive values of \(p ?\)

Given any infinite series \(\sum a_{k}\) let \(N(r)\) be the number of terms of the series that must be summed to guarantee that the remainder is less than \(10^{-r}\) in magnitude, where \(r\) is a positive integer. a. Graph the function \(N(r)\) for the three alternating \(p\) -series \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{k^{p}},\) for \(p=1,2,\) and \(3 .\) Compare the three graphs and discuss what they mean about the rates of convergence of the three series. b. Carry out the procedure of part (a) for the series \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{k !}\) and compare the rates of convergence of all four series.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free