Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why the two forms of Green's Theorem are analogs of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain why the two forms of Green's Theorem are analogs of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The two forms of Green's Theorem are analogs of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus because they both establish a connection between differentiation and integration in their respective domains. Green's Theorem generalizes the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to two-dimensional vector fields. Both theorems show that integrating a derivative in some form yields a net change in the underlying function. In specific cases where curl or divergence vanishes in Green's Theorem, there is an analogous relationship to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus concerning potential functions and vector potentials. This correspondence emphasizes the connection between differentiation and integration in both Green's Theorem and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus states that if a function f(x) has an antiderivative F(x) on an interval [a, b], then \[\int_a^b f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a)\] This theorem connects differentiation and integration, showing that integrating the derivative of a function over an interval yields the net change of the function over that interval.
02

Learn Green's Theorem

Green's Theorem is a result in vector calculus that relates the line integral of a vector field around a simple closed curve C to the double integral of the curl of the vector field over the region D enclosed by the curve C. Green's Theorem has two forms: 1. Circulation form: For a vector field \(\vec{F}(x,y) = P(x,y)\vec{i} + Q(x,y)\vec{j}\), Green's theorem states \[\oint_C (P dx + Q dy) = \iint_D (\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}) dA\] 2. Flux form: For a vector field \(\vec{F}(x,y) = P(x,y)\vec{i} + Q(x,y)\vec{j}\), Green's theorem states \[\oint_C (Pdy - Qdx) = \iint_D (\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial Q}{\partial y}) dA\]
03

Analog between the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Green's Theorem in circulation form

In circulation form, vanishing curl (\(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = 0\)) implies that there is a potential function \(\phi(x,y)\) such that \[P = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}\] \[Q = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}\] Now, consider a line integral along curve C in the xy plane, from point A to point B, say, \[\int_A^B (P dx + Q dy)\] Since the curl vanishes, we can write the line integral as \[\int_A^B (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} dx + \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} dy)\] This is analogous to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: \[\int_a^b \frac{d\phi}{dx} dx = \phi(B) - \phi(A)\]
04

Analog between the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Green's Theorem in flux form

The analog in the flux form is similar. For vanishing divergence (\(\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial Q}{\partial y} = 0\)), we can find a vector potential \(\vec{A}(x,y) = A(x,y) \vec{i} + B(x,y) \vec{j}\) such that \[P = \frac{\partial A}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial B}{\partial x} \] \[Q = \frac{\partial A}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial B}{\partial y} \] Now, consider a line integral along curve C in the xy plane, from point A to point B, say, \[\int_A^B (P dy - Q dx)\] We can write the line integral as \[\int_A^B (\frac{\partial A}{\partial y} dy - \frac{\partial A}{\partial x} dx)\] This again corresponds to the Fundamental theorem of calculus: \[\int_a^b \frac{dA}{dx} dx = A(B) - A(A)\] In conclusion, the two forms of Green's Theorem are analogs of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus because they both show the connection between differentiation and integration in their respective domains. In the case of Green's Theorem, the relationships hold for two-dimensional vector fields and the line integrals around closed curves, whereas the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus relates the integral of a function's derivative to the function's antiderivative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For what vectors \(\mathbf{n}\) is \((\operatorname{curl} \mathbf{F}) \cdot \mathbf{n}=0\) when \(\mathbf{F}=\langle y,-2 z,-x\rangle ?\)

Find the work required to move an object in the following force fields along a line segment between the given points. Check to see whether the force is conservative. $$\mathbf{F}=\langle x, y, z\rangle \text { from } A(1,2,1) \text { to } B(2,4,6)$$

The Navier-Stokes equation is the fundamental equation of fluid dynamics that models the flow in everything from bathtubs to oceans. In one of its many forms (incompressible, viscous flow), the equation is $$\rho\left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{V}}{\partial t}+(\mathbf{V} \cdot \nabla) \mathbf{V}\right)=-\nabla p+\mu(\nabla \cdot \nabla) \mathbf{V}.$$ In this notation, \(\mathbf{V}=\langle u, v, w\rangle\) is the three-dimensional velocity field, \(p\) is the (scalar) pressure, \(\rho\) is the constant density of the fluid, and \(\mu\) is the constant viscosity. Write out the three component equations of this vector equation. (See Exercise 40 for an interpretation of the operations.)

Consider the radial field \(\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{r} /|\mathbf{r}|^{p}\) where \(\mathbf{r}=\langle x, y, z\rangle\) and \(p\) is a real number. Let \(S\) be the sphere of radius \(a\) centered at the origin. Show that the outward flux of \(\mathbf{F}\) across the sphere is \(4 \pi / a^{p-3} .\) It is instructive to do the calculation using both an explicit and parametric description of the sphere.

Consider the radial field \(\mathbf{F}=\frac{\mathbf{r}}{|\mathbf{r}|^{p}}=\frac{\langle x, y, z\rangle}{|\mathbf{r}|^{p}},\) where \(p>1\) (the inverse square law corresponds to \(p=3\) ). Let \(C\) be the line from (1,1,1) to \((a, a, a),\) where \(a>1,\) given by \(\mathbf{r}(t)=\langle t, t, t\rangle,\) for \(1 \leq t \leq a\) a. Find the work done in moving an object along \(C\) with \(p=2\) b. If \(a \rightarrow \infty\) in part (a), is the work finite? c. Find the work done in moving an object moving along \(C\) with \(p=4.\) d. If \(a \rightarrow \infty\) in part (c), is the work finite? e. Find the work done in moving an object moving along \(C\) for any \(p>1\) f. If \(a \rightarrow \infty\) in part (e), for what values of \(p\) is the work finite?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free