Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For the following telescoping series, find a formula for the nth term of the sequence of partial sums \(\left\\{S_{n}\right\\} .\) Then evaluate lim \(S_{n}\) to obtain the value of the series or state that the series diverges. \(^{n \rightarrow \infty}\) $$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(3 k+1)(3 k+4)}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The value of the series is $\frac{1}{8}$.

Step by step solution

01

Rewrite the general term k

To start, let's rewrite the given sum in terms of k: $$\frac{1}{(3 k+1)(3 k+4)}$$ We will try to decompose it into partial fractions: $$\frac{1}{(3 k+1)(3 k+4)}=\frac{A}{3 k+1} + \frac{B}{3 k+4}$$ Where A and B are constants we need to find.
02

Determine the constants A and B

To determine values of A and B, we can clear denominators by multiplying both sides by \((3 k+1)(3 k+4)\): $$1=A(3 k+4)+B(3 k+1)$$ For k = 0, we get: $$1=4A \Rightarrow A=\frac{1}{4}$$ For k = -1, we get: $$1 = -2B \Rightarrow B=-\frac{1}{2}$$ Now we can rewrite our sum with the determined values of A and B: $$\frac{1}{(3 k+1)(3 k+4)}=\frac{1/4}{3 k+1} + \frac{-1/2}{3 k+4}$$
03

Write the partial sum formula

Let's find the formula for the sequence of partial sums \(S_n\): $$S_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n} \left\{ \frac{1/4}{3 k+1} + \frac{-1/2}{3 k+4} \right\}$$ As the sums telescopes, we can write it as: $$S_{n}=\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{1+3}+\frac{1}{3+1}-\frac{1}{3+1+3}+\dots+\frac{1}{3(n-1)+1}-\frac{1}{3(n-1)+1+3}\right)-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{4+3}+\frac{1}{3+4}-\frac{1}{3+4+3}+\dots+\frac{1}{3n+1}-\frac{1}{3n+1+3}\right)$$ This simplifies to: $$S_{n}=\frac{1}{4}\left(1-\frac{1}{3n+4}\right)-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{3n+7}\right)$$
04

Find the limit of the partial sum

Now, we will find the limit of the partial sum as n approaches infinity to check the convergence of the series: $$\lim_{n\to\infty} S_{n}=\lim_{n\to\infty} \left[\frac{1}{4}\left(1-\frac{1}{3n+4}\right)-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{3n+7}\right)\right]$$ Since the limit of (\(1/(3n+4)\)) and (\(1/(3n+7)\)) as n approaches infinity is 0, we get: $$\lim_{n\to\infty} S_{n} = \frac{1}{4}(1) - \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{4}\right) = \frac{1}{4} - \frac{1}{8} = \frac{1}{8}$$ The limit exists and is equal to \(\frac{1}{8}\). Therefore, the series converges, and the value of the series is: $$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(3 k+1)(3 k+4)}=\frac{1}{8}$$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Partial Fractions
Partial fractions play a key role in simplifying complex rational expressions. When you have a fraction with a polynomial in the denominator, like \( \frac{1}{(3k+1)(3k+4)} \), you can't easily perform operations with it, such as integration or finding partial sums. This is where partial fraction decomposition comes in handy.
This process involves breaking down a complicated fraction into a sum of simpler fractions. For a partial fraction decomposition, we express:
  • \( \frac{1}{(3k+1)(3k+4)} \)
  • as \( \frac{A}{3k+1} + \frac{B}{3k+4} \)
Using algebra, we need to determine the constants \(A\) and \(B\). By clearing the denominators and matching coefficients, we find suitable values for these constants that satisfy the original equation. In the example, \(A = \frac{1}{4}\) and \(B = -\frac{1}{2}\), allowing for a simplified computation of sums over the series. This makes the math manageable and opens the door for telescoping, greatly simplifying subsequent steps.
Convergence of Series
Understanding the convergence or divergence of a series is crucial in determining if the series adds to a specific, finite value.For the series \(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(3 k+1)(3 k+4)}\), we're interested in finding if the infinite sum results in a finite number or not. One way to approach this is by examining the partial sums \(S_n\), defined as the sum of the first \(n\) terms of the series.
If the sequence of partial sums \(\{S_n\}\) converges to a limit as \(n\) approaches infinity, then the series itself converges to this limit. In our problem, we use this approach to find if the series converges.
After simplifying the series with partial fractions, we observe the series undergoes telescoping, where many terms cancel. This kind of simplification helps reveal the convergence properties. Ultimately, the limit \(\lim_{n\to\infty} S_n\) will tell us if the sum is finite. If it reaches a finite value, the series is convergent, as we confirm with the value \( \frac{1}{8} \).
Partial Sums
Partial sums, denoted usually by \(S_n\), form the basis of summing infinite series incrementally. For the series in question, the partial sum \(S_n\) is defined as:
  • \( S_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \left( \frac{1/4}{3k+1} + \frac{-1/2}{3k+4} \right) \)
This expression shows how partial sums are constructed from the series' terms up to the \(n\)-th term. The telescoping nature of this series means that many terms cancel each other out when computed for consecutive \(n\), simplifying the expression for \(S_n\).
With simplification, \(S_n\) becomes:
  • \( S_{n}=\frac{1}{4}\left(1-\frac{1}{3n+4}\right)-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{3n+7}\right) \)
These partial sums give us insights into the overall behavior of the series. Evaluating the limit of \(S_n\) as \(n\) grows helps us determine the convergence of the series.
Limits of Sequences
Calculating the limit of a sequence of partial sums gives us critical information about the convergence of an entire series. This is the last, essential step, where we examine the behavior of \(\lim_{n\to\infty} S_n\).
In the example provided, we find the limit of:
  • \(\frac{1}{4}(1-\frac{1}{3n+4})-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{3n+7})\)
As \(n\) approaches infinity, certain components \(\left(\frac{1}{3n+4}\) and \(\frac{1}{3n+7}\right)\) go to zero. This allows us to focus on constants in the expression, leading to a finite limit.
In our case, the limiting process results in \(\frac{1}{4} - \frac{1}{8} = \frac{1}{8}\), indicating that the series converges to this value. By finding this limit, we learn not only about the sum of the series but also verify the convergence. It reassures us that even though an infinite number of terms are involved, they summarize to a finite and predictable value.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following sequences defined by a recurrence relation. Use a calculator, analytical methods, and/or graphing to make a conjecture about the value of the limit or determine that the limit does not exist. $$a_{n+1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(a_{n}+2 / a_{n}\right) ; a_{0}=2, n=0,1,2, \dots$$

Explain the fallacy in the following argument. Let \(x=\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{7}+\cdots\) and \(y=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{6}+\frac{1}{8}+\cdots .\) It follows that \(2 y=x+y\), which implies that \(x=y .\) On the other hand, $$x-y=\left(1-\frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{5}-\frac{1}{6}\right)+\cdots>0$$ is a sum of positive terms, so \(x>y .\) Thus, we have shown that \(x=y\) and \(x>y\).

Consider the following infinite series. a. Write out the first four terms of the sequence of partial sums. b. Estimate the limit of \(\left\\{S_{n}\right\\}\) or state that it does not exist. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{k} k$$

Showing that \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{2}}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{6} \operatorname{In} 1734,\) Leonhard Euler informally proved that \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{2}}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{6} .\) An elegant proof is outlined here that uses the inequality $$ \cot ^{2} x<\frac{1}{x^{2}}<1+\cot ^{2} x\left(\text { provided that } 0

Here is a fascinating (unsolved) problem known as the hailstone problem (or the Ulam Conjecture or the Collatz Conjecture). It involves sequences in two different ways. First, choose a positive integer \(N\) and call it \(a_{0} .\) This is the seed of a sequence. The rest of the sequence is generated as follows: For \(n=0,1,2, \ldots\) $$a_{n+1}=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} a_{n} / 2 & \text { if } a_{n} \text { is even } \\ 3 a_{n}+1 & \text { if } a_{n} \text { is odd. } \end{array}\right.$$ However, if \(a_{n}=1\) for any \(n,\) then the sequence terminates. a. Compute the sequence that results from the seeds \(N=2,3\), \(4, \ldots, 10 .\) You should verify that in all these cases, the sequence eventually terminates. The hailstone conjecture (still unproved) states that for all positive integers \(N,\) the sequence terminates after a finite number of terms. b. Now define the hailstone sequence \(\left\\{H_{k}\right\\},\) which is the number of terms needed for the sequence \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\}\) to terminate starting with a seed of \(k\). Verify that \(H_{2}=1, H_{3}=7,\) and \(H_{4}=2\). c. Plot as many terms of the hailstone sequence as is feasible. How did the sequence get its name? Does the conjecture appear to be true?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free