Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Let \(\mathscr{O}=\mathscr{O}_{P}\left(\mathbb{A}^{2}\right)\) for some \(P \in \mathbb{A}^{2}, \mathfrak{m}=\mathfrak{m}_{P}\left(\mathbb{A}^{2}\right) .\) Calculate \(\chi(n)=\operatorname{dim}_{k}\left(\mathscr{O} / \mathrm{m}^{n}\right)\). (b) Let \(\mathscr{O}=\mathscr{O}_{P}\left(\mathbb{A}^{r}(k)\right)\). Show that \(\chi(n)\) is a polynomial of degree \(r\) in \(n\), with leading coefficient \(1 / r !\) (see Problem 2.36).

Short Answer

Expert verified
(b) In part (b) of the solution, we used induction to prove that the dimension of the quotient \(\mathscr{O}/\mathfrak{m}^n\) is a polynomial of degree \(r\) in \(n\) with leading coefficient \(1/r!\) for \(P \in \mathbb{A}^r(k)\). State the formula for the Hilbert function \(\chi(n)\) in terms of \(r\).

Step by step solution

01

Set up the problem

We are given that \(\mathscr{O} = \mathscr{O}_P(\mathbb{A}^2) \) and \(\mathfrak{m} = \mathfrak{m}_P(\mathbb{A}^2)\). We need to compute the dimension of the quotient \(\mathscr{O}/\mathfrak{m}^n\).
02

Understand the structure of \(\mathscr{O}_P(\mathbb{A}^{2})\) and \(\mathfrak{m}_P(\mathbb{A}^{2})\)

\(\mathscr{O}_P(\mathbb{A}^2)\) is the localization of the coordinate ring \(k[x, y]\) at the prime ideal \(\mathscr{P}_P\), so \(\mathscr{O}_P(\mathbb{A}^2)= k[x,y]_{\mathscr{P}_P}\). Then the maximal ideal \(\mathfrak{m}_P(\mathbb{A}^2)\) consists of all fractions \(\dfrac{f}{g} \in\mathscr{O}_P(\mathbb{A}^2)=k[x,y]_{\mathscr{P}_P}\) with \(f, g \in k[x, y]\) and \(g \notin \mathscr{P}_P\) such that \(f(0,0) = 0\).
03

Determine the basis for the quotient

Consider the polynomial ring \(k[x, y]\). Let \(f \in k[x, y]\) be a polynomial of degree \(n\). Observe that its leading monomials are of the form \(x^{n-j}y^j\) for \(j=0,1,2,\ldots,n\). Therefore, the possible monomials for a polynomial of degree less than or equal to \(n\) are of the form \(x^iy^j\), where \(i+j \leq n\). These monomials form a basis for \(k[x, y]/(x, y)^{n+1}\). Next, the elements of \(\mathfrak{m}^n\) are of the form \(\dfrac{f}{g}\), where \(f\in(x,y)^n\) and \(g\notin (x,y)\). There are \(n\) basis elements of \(k[x,y]/(x,y)^{n+1}\) going from the diagonal to the left in the following pattern: $$ x^ny^0, x^{n-1}y^1, x^{n-2}y^2, \ldots, x^0y^n $$ Hence, the dimension of the quotient \(\mathscr{O}/\mathfrak{m}^n\) is \(n+1\). Therefore, \(\chi(n)=\operatorname{dim}_{k}\left(\mathscr{O}/\mathfrak{m}^n\right)=n+1\). (b)
04

Set up the problem

We are given that \(\mathscr{O} = \mathscr{O}_P(\mathbb{A}^r)\) and now we need to show that the dimension of the quotient \(\mathscr{O}/\mathfrak{m}^n\) is a polynomial of degree \(r\) in \(n\) with leading coefficient \(1/r!\).
05

Use induction to derive the general formula

We will use induction on \(r\). We have already proved the base case for \(r=2\) in part (a). Suppose that the formula holds true for \(r=k\), i.e., \(\chi_k(n) = \frac{1}{k!}\left(n^k + \text{lower order terms}\right)\). Now we need to show that it holds for \(r=k+1\).
06

Calculate the dimension of the quotient for \(r=k+1\)

Consider a polynomial of degree less than or equal to \(n\) in the polynomial ring \(k[x_1, \ldots, x_{k+1}]\). This polynomial can be written as a linear combination of monomials \(x_1^{i_1}\cdots x_{k+1}^{i_{k+1}}\) with \(\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}i_j \leq n\). It is known that the number of basis elements for this space is the binomial coefficient \(\binom{n+k}{k}\). By the induction hypothesis, \(\chi_{k+1}(n) - \chi_k(n) = \binom{n+k}{k} - \frac{1}{k!}\left(n^k + \text{lower order terms}\right)\). By induction, we need to show that: $$ \chi_{k+1}(n) = \frac{1}{(k+1)!}\left(n^{k+1}+\text{lower order terms}\right) $$ We will proceed by using an algebraic trick.
07

Use an algebraic trick to derive the formula

Observe that \(\binom{n+k}{k} = \frac{n(n-1)\cdots(n-k+1)}{k!}\). We can write \(\binom{n+k}{k} - \frac{1}{k!}\left(n^k + \text{lower order terms}\right)\) as: $$ \frac{n(n-1)\cdots(n-k+1)}{k!}-\frac{1}{k!}\left(n^k+\text{lower order terms}\right) $$ $$ \frac{n^{k+1}+\text{lower order terms}}{k!} $$ Multiplying by a factor of \((k+1)\), we obtain: $$ \chi_{k+1}(n) = \frac{1}{(k+1)!}\left(n^{k+1}+\text{lower order terms}\right) $$ which is what we wanted to show. Therefore, the result holds for \(r=k+1\) by induction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Dimension of Quotient
Understanding the dimension of a quotient space in algebraic geometry is essential for grasping more complex topics. When we talk about the dimension of the quotient \( \mathscr{O} / \mathfrak{m}^n \), we're counting the number of linearly independent elements that can exist in this space.
In our specific problem, we determine the dimension by finding a basis for the quotient \(k[x, y]/(x, y)^{n+1}\) and counting the number of monomials in it, which ends up being \(n+1\), reflecting the polynomial's degree and the binomial coefficient. This conceptual understanding also lays the groundwork for tackling more complex dimensions in higher-dimensional spaces.
Localization of Coordinate Ring
Localization is a process that allows us to focus on the properties of algebraic objects at a particular point or set of points. For a point \(P\) in the affine space \(\mathbb{A}^2\), the localization of the coordinate ring, often denoted as \( \mathscr{O}_P(\mathbb{A}^2) \), is essentially the coordinate ring \(k[x, y]\) but with an altered structure that takes into account the localization at a prime ideal. This provides a magnified look at the algebraic structure near that point, offering a way to understand the behaviour of functions within a local neighbourhood.
Maximal Ideal
In algebraic structures, an ideal is a subset that retains certain characteristics that align with the ring it's part of.
A maximal ideal is particularly interesting because it's an ideal that is not contained in any larger ideal (except for the ring itself), which indicates that it plays a significant role in the underlying algebraic structure.
In our case, the maximal ideal \(\mathfrak{m}_P(\mathbb{A}^2)\) relates to the point \(P\), embodying functions that vanish at \(P\). This concept is pivotal in defining local properties and facilitating a deeper understanding of algebraic curves at specific points.
Polynomial Degree
The degree of a polynomial is a fundamental concept in algebra that refers to the highest power of the variable in the expression.
It's crucial in determining the polynomial's properties, such as the number of roots it might have or its end behaviour. Investigating the polynomial degree connects closely to understanding the structure of the function it represents.
In our exercise, the degree dictated the number of basis elements in the space and related directly to the dimension of the quotient, showcasing the intersection of algebraic and geometric reasoning in the problem-solving process.
Binomial Coefficient
The binomial coefficient, symbolically represented as \( \binom{n}{k} \), quantifies the number of ways to choose \(k\) elements from a set of \(n\) items without regard to the order of selection.
An essential element in combinatorics, it also arises in algebraic contexts, such as in our solution where it's used to count the number of monomials of a certain degree. This number then feeds into the determination of the dimension of our quotient space — illustrating that these coefficients are more than just combinatorial tools; they have important algebraic implications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The object of this problem is to find a property of the local ring \(\mathscr{O}_{P}(F)\) that determines whether or not \(P\) is an ordinary multiple point on \(F\). Let \(F\) be an irreducible plane curve, \(P=(0,0), m=m_{P}(F)>1\). Let \(\mathfrak{m}=\mathfrak{m}_{P}(F)\). For \(G \in k[X, Y]\), denote its residue in \(\Gamma(F)\) by \(g ;\) and for \(g \in \mathfrak{m}\), denote its residue in \(\mathfrak{m} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) by \(\bar{g}\). (a) Show that the map from \\{forms of degree 1 in \(k[X, Y]\\}\) to \(\mathfrak{m} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) taking \(a X+\) \(b Y\) to \(\overline{a x+b y}\) is an isomorphism of vector spaces (see Problem 3.13). (b) Suppose \(P\) is an ordinary multiple point, with tangents \(L_{1}, \ldots, L_{m}\). Show that \(I\left(P, F \cap L_{i}\right)>m\) and \(\bar{l}_{i} \neq \lambda \overline{l_{j}}\) for all \(i \neq j\), all \(\lambda \in k\). (c) Suppose there are \(G_{1}, \ldots, G_{m} \in k[X, Y]\) such that \(I\left(P, F \cap G_{i}\right)>m\) and \(\bar{g}_{i} \neq \lambda \bar{g}_{j}\) for all \(i \neq j\), and all \(\lambda \in k\). Show that \(P\) is an ordinary multiple point on \(F .\) (Hint:: Write \(G_{i}=L_{i}+\) higher terms. \(\bar{l}_{i}=\bar{g}_{i} \neq 0\), and \(L_{i}\) is the tangent to \(G_{i}\), so \(L_{i}\) is tangent to \(F\) by Property (5) of intersection numbers. Thus \(F\) has \(m\) tangents at \(P .\) ) (d) Show that \(P\) is an ordinary multiple point on \(F\) if and only if there are \(g_{1}, \ldots, g_{m} \in \mathfrak{m}\) such that \(\bar{g}_{i} \neq \lambda \bar{g}_{j}\) for all \(i \neq j, \lambda \in k\), and \(\operatorname{dim} \mathscr{O}_{P}(F) /\left(g_{i}\right)>m\)

Show that an irreducible plane curve has only a finite number of multiple points. Is this true for hypersurfaces?

Let \(T: \mathbb{A}^{2} \rightarrow \mathbb{A}^{2}\) be a polynomial map, \(T(Q)=P\). (a) Show that \(m_{Q}\left(F^{T}\right) \geq\) \(m_{P}(F)\). (b) Let \(T=\left(T_{1}, T_{2}\right)\), and define \(J_{Q} T=\left(\partial T_{i} / \partial X_{j}(Q)\right)\) to be the Jacobian matrix of \(T\) at \(Q\). Show that \(m_{Q}\left(F^{T}\right)=m_{P}(F)\) if \(J_{Q} T\) is invertible. (c) Show that the converse of (b) is false: let \(T=\left(X^{2}, Y\right), F=Y-X^{2}, P=Q=(0,0)\).

If a curve \(F\) of degree \(n\) has a point \(P\) of multiplicity \(n\), show that \(F\) consists of \(n\) lines through \(P\) (not necessarily distinct).

Irreducible curves with given tangent lines \(L_{i}\) of multiplicity \(r_{i}\) may be constructed as follows: if \(\sum r_{i}=m\), let \(F=\Pi L_{i}^{r_{i}}+F_{m+1}\), where \(F_{m+1}\) is chosen to make \(F\) irreducible (see Problem 2.34).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free