Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(N, P\) be submodules of a module \(M\). Show that the subgroup \(N+P=\) \(\\{n+p \mid n \in N, p \in P\\}\) is a submodule of \(M\). Show that there is a natural \(R\)-module isomorphism of \(N / N \cap P\) onto \(N+P / P\) (“First Noether Isomorphism Theorem").

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove the First Noether Isomorphism Theorem, which states that for any two submodules N and P of a module M, there exists a natural R-module isomorphism between the quotient modules N / (N ∩ P) and (N+P) / P. Solution: To prove the First Noether Isomorphism Theorem, we documented the following steps: 1. We showed that the sum of N and P, denoted as N+P, is a submodule of M. 2. We demonstrated the existence of a natural homomorphism between N and (N+P) / P. 3. We proved that the kernel of this homomorphism is N ∩ P. 4. We applied the First Isomorphism Theorem to show that there exists an R-module isomorphism between N / (N ∩ P) and (N+P) / P. By completing these steps, we established the First Noether Isomorphism Theorem, which demonstrates a natural R-module isomorphism between the quotient modules N / (N ∩ P) and (N+P) / P.

Step by step solution

01

Show that the Sum is a submodule of M

To prove this, we need to check if N+P satisfies the submodule conditions: a. It contains the zero element. b. It is closed under addition. c. It is closed under scalar multiplication. Let n ∈ N and p ∈ P, then n+p ∈ N+P. To prove that N+P is a submodule, we check the criteria. (a) Since 0 ∈ N and 0 ∈ P, we have 0+0 ∈ N+P, which implies that 0 ∈ N+P. (b) Let (n_1 + p_1), (n_2 + p_2) ∈ N+P. Then, (n_1 + n_2) ∈ N and (p_1 +p_2) ∈ P, because both N and P are submodules. So, (n_1 + p_1) + (n_2 + p_2) = (n_1 + n_2) + (p_1 + p_2) ∈ N+P. (c) For any r ∈ R and any (n + p) ∈ N+P, we have r(n + p) = rn + rp. Since N and P are submodules, rn ∈ N and rp ∈ P, hence rn + rp ∈ N+P. So, N+P is a submodule of M.
02

Show the existence of a natural homomorphism between N and (N+P) / P

Consider the map ψ: N → (N+P) / P, defined as ψ(n) = n + P for every n ∈ N. We first need to show that this map is a homomorphism. Let n_1, n_2 ∈ N and r ∈ R. Then: ψ(n_1 + n_2) = (n_1 + n_2) + P = n_1 + P + n_2 + P = ψ(n_1) + ψ(n_2), ψ(rn_1) = rn_1 + P = r(n_1 + P) = rψ(n_1). Since ψ preserves addition and scalar multiplication, it is a homomorphism.
03

Prove that the kernel of the homomorphism is N ∩ P

Consider the homomorphism ψ: N → (N+P) / P, with ψ(n) = n + P. The kernel of ψ is defined as Ker(ψ) = {n ∈ N | ψ(n) = P}, which means that n + P = P or n ∈ P. Therefore, Ker(ψ) = N ∩ P.
04

Apply the First Isomorphism Theorem to show that there exists an R-module isomorphism between N / (N ∩ P) and (N+P) / P

Given the homomorphism ψ: N → (N+P) / P and Ker(ψ) = N ∩ P, by the First Isomorphism Theorem, we have: N / (N ∩ P) ≅ (N+P) / P. Hence, there exists a natural R-module isomorphism between N / (N ∩ P) and (N+P) / P, which is the First Noether Isomorphism Theorem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Submodules of a Module
In the vast world of algebra, modules play a fundamental role, much like vector spaces, but with more generality. A submodule, analogous to a subspace in vector spaces, is a subset that retains the structure of the module in a smaller scope. For a set to qualify as a submodule, it must contain the zero element, be closed under addition, and scalar multiplication by elements of the ring R.

Let's look at a practical example. If we take submodules N and P of a module M, we see this submodule structure in action. When we consider the sum N+P, defined as the set of all sums of elements from N and P, we find it's a submodule because it satisfies these three critical properties. Even if you are just starting to grasp the fundamental aspects of algebra, seeing how submodules function within a larger structure makes the abstract more tangible and accessible.
Module Isomorphism
Fascinating connections emerge in algebra when we look at the structure-preserving maps between entities, and module isomorphisms stand out among these. An isomorphism is a bijective homomorphism; it's a two-way relationship that maintains operations between two algebraic structures.

In simpler terms, imagine you have two different images made out of the same puzzle pieces. A module isomorphism is the guide that shows how these pieces fit together in both images without any leftover or missing pieces. It implies that the two structures are essentially the same, even if their presentations differ. This concept reassures us that for all the apparent complexity of algebra, there's an underlying order and symmetry that can often be unveiled.
R-module Homomorphism
As we journey through the realm of modules, we stumble upon R-module homomorphisms, which are the pathways allowing us to move from one module to another while respecting the module's operations - addition and multiplication by scalars from the ring R.

These functions are like translators that faithfully convert ideas from one language to another, maintaining the essence of the original message. Continuing with our example from the exercise, when we take a module N and map it to (N+P) / P using a certain homomorphism, we are creating a dialogue between these two modules, where the structure of N is reflected in how it relates to the other within the quotient module (N+P) / P.
Kernel of a Homomorphism
One of the key concepts in module theory is the kernel of a homomorphism. It functions like a filter that captures any elements from the domain that become zero in the codomain under the homomorphism. It reveals which parts of one module correspond to the 'nothingness' or zero element of another.

If we turn our math lenses on our example, the kernel of the homomorphism ψ from N to (N+P) / P is the set of elements in N that, when mapped, become the zero element of the codomain. In this case, it's the intersection of N and P: the common ground shared by both submodules, furthering our understanding of how these structures interact.
Algebraic Curves
When our gaze shifts from the abstract algebraic structures, we might land on the enchanting landscape of algebraic curves. These curves represent solutions to polynomial equations in two variables, like footprints left on the sand marking the journey of possible values that satisfy a shared equation.

Although they don't appear directly in the Noether Isomorphism Theorem, algebraic curves embody the interaction between algebra and geometry, which is a beacon of understanding throughout higher mathematics. By exploring the properties of these curves, one delves further into the connections between algebraic structures and their geometric interpretations, enriching the overall appreciation of mathematical beauty and symmetry.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(\varphi: V \rightarrow W\) is a polynomial map, and \(X\) is an algebraic subset of \(W\), show that \(\varphi^{-1}(X)\) is an algebraic subset of \(V\). If \(\varphi^{-1}(X)\) is irreducible, and \(X\) is contained in the image of \(\varphi\), show that \(X\) is irreducible. This gives a useful test for irreducibility.

Let \(R\) be a DVR with quotient field \(K\), ord the order function on \(K\). (a) If \(\operatorname{ord}(a)<\operatorname{ord}(b)\), show that ord \((a+b)=\operatorname{ord}(a)\). (b) If \(a_{1}, \ldots, a_{n} \in K\), and for some \(i, \operatorname{ord}\left(a_{i}\right)<\operatorname{ord}\left(a_{j}\right)\) (all \(j \neq i\) ), then \(a_{1}+\cdots+a_{n} \neq 0\).

Let \(P=\left(a_{1}, \ldots, a_{n}\right), Q=\left(b_{1}, \ldots, b_{n}\right)\) be distinct points of \(\mathbb{A}^{n}\). The line through \(P\) and \(Q\) is defined to be \(\left.\left\\{a_{1}+t\left(b_{1}-a_{1}\right), \ldots, a_{n}+t\left(b_{n}-a_{n}\right)\right) \mid t \in k\right\\}\). (a) Show that if \(L\) is the line through \(P\) and \(Q\), and \(T\) is an affine change of coordinates, then \(T(L)\) is the line through \(T(P)\) and \(T(Q)\). (b) Show that a line is a linear subvariety of dimension 1, and that a linear subvariety of dimension 1 is the line through any two of its points. (c) Show that, in \(\mathbb{A}^{2}\), a line is the same thing as a hyperplane. (d) Let \(P\), \(P^{\prime} \in \mathbb{A}^{2}, L_{1}, L_{2}\) two distinct lines through \(P, L_{1}^{\prime}, L_{2}^{\prime}\) distinct lines through \(P^{\prime}\). Show that there is an affine change of coordinates \(T\) of \(\mathbb{A}^{2}\) such that \(T(P)=P^{\prime}\) and \(T\left(L_{i}\right)=L_{i}^{\prime}, i=1,2\).

Let \(R\) be a DVR satisfying the conditions of Problem \(2.30\). Then \(\mathfrak{m}^{n} / \mathrm{m}^{n+1}\) is an \(R\)-module, and so also a \(k\)-module, since \(k \subset R\). (a) Show that \(\operatorname{dim}_{k}\left(\mathfrak{m}^{n} / \mathrm{m}^{n+1}\right)=1\) for all \(n \geq 0\). (b) Show that \(\operatorname{dim}_{k}\left(R / \mathfrak{m}^{n}\right)=n\) for all \(n>0\). (c) Let \(z \in R\). Show that \(\operatorname{ord}(z)=n\) if \((z)=\mathfrak{m}^{n}\), and hence that \(\operatorname{ord}(z)=\operatorname{dim}_{k}(R /(z))\).

(a)] Let \(\varphi: \mathbb{A}^{1} \rightarrow V=V\left(Y^{2}-X^{3}\right) \subset \mathbb{A}^{2}\) be defined by \(\varphi(t)=\left(t^{2}, t^{3}\right)\). Show that although \(\varphi\) is a one-to-one, onto polynomial map, \(\varphi\) is not an isomorphism. (Hint:: \(\left.\tilde{\varphi}(\Gamma(V))=k\left[T^{2}, T^{3}\right] \subset k[T]=\Gamma\left(\mathbb{A}^{1}\right) .\right)\) (b) Let \(\varphi: \mathbb{A}^{1} \rightarrow V=V\left(Y^{2}-X^{2}(X+1)\right)\) be de fined by \(\varphi(t)=\left(t^{2}-1, t\left(t^{2}-1\right)\right)\). Show that \(\varphi\) is one-to-one and onto, except that \(\varphi(\pm 1)=(0,0)\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free