Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

By showing that the integrand is an exact differential, evaluate a) \(\int_{(1,1,2)}^{(3.5 .0)} y z d x+x z d y+x y d z\) on any path; b) \(\int_{z=t}^{(1.0 .2 \pi)} \sin y z d x+x z \cos y z d y+x y \cos y z d z\). on the helix \(x=\cos t . y=\sin t\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
#Conclusion# In conclusion, we have solved the two given line integrals and found the following results: a) For the line integral \(\int_{(1,1,2)}^{(3,5,0)} yz\,dx + xz\,dy + xy\,dz\), since the integrand is an exact differential, we found its value to be \(\frac{-8}{3}\) on any path. b) For the line integral \(\int_{z=t}^{(1,0,2\pi)} \sin(yz)\,dx + xz\cos(yz)\,dy + xy\cos(yz)\,dz\) on the helix \(x=\cos t, y=\sin t\), its value cannot be expressed in a closed form. Instead, it can only be approximated using numerical methods or evaluated using numerical softwares like Wolfram Alpha or Matlab.

Step by step solution

01

Determine if the integrand is an exact differential

To check if \(\int_{(1,1,2)}^{(3,5,0)} yz\,dx + xz\,dy + xy\,dz\) is an exact differential, we must first check if \(\frac{\partial (yz)}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial (xz)}{\partial x}\), \(\frac{\partial (xz)}{\partial z} = \frac{\partial (xy)}{\partial y}\), and \(\frac{\partial (xy)}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial (yz)}{\partial z}\). Calculate the partial derivatives: \(\frac{\partial (yz)}{\partial y} = z\) \(\frac{\partial (xz)}{\partial x} = z\) \(\frac{\partial (xz)}{\partial z} = x\) \(\frac{\partial (xy)}{\partial y} = x\) \(\frac{\partial (xy)}{\partial x} = y\) \(\frac{\partial (yz)}{\partial z} = y\) Since these partial derivatives are equal, the integrand is an exact differential.
02

Evaluate the integral on any path

Since the integrand is an exact differential, we can choose any path between the two points \((1,1,2)\) and \((3,5,0)\), and the result will be the same. The simplest path to choose is a straight line between the two points, with the parameterization \(\vec{r}(t) = \langle1+t(3-1),1+t(5-1),2+t(0-2)\rangle\), where \(0\leq t \leq1\). Differentiate \(\vec{r}(t)\) with respect to \(t\) to get \(\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}=\langle2,4,-2\rangle\). We can rewrite the integral as \(\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}\), where \(\vec{F}=\langle yz, xz, xy \rangle = \langle (1+4t)2t, (1+2t)(-2t), (1+2t)(1+4t) \rangle\). Now, evaluate the dot product \(\vec{F}\cdot\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} = (1+4t)2t\cdot2+(1+2t)(-2t)\cdot4+(1+2t)(1+4t)\cdot(-2)\). Integrating this expression with respect to \(t\) from \(0\) to \(1\), we get the value of our line integral: \(\int_0^1 [(1+4t)2t\cdot2+(1+2t)(-2t)\cdot4+(1+2t)(1+4t)\cdot(-2)]dt =\frac{-8}{3}\). b)
03

Parameterize the helix

The helix is given by \(x=\cos t, y=\sin t\). We can parameterize this curve as \(\vec{r}(t) = \langle\cos t, \sin t, t\rangle\), where \(0\leq t \leq 2\pi\).
04

Substitute parameterization into the integral

Now, we will replace \(x,y,z\) with their corresponding parameterized expressions and then compute the dot product. Calculate the derivatives of \(\vec{r}(t)\) with respect to \(t\). We get \(\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} = \langle -\sin t, \cos t, 1\rangle\). The given integral is \(\int_C \sin(yz)\,dx + xz\cos(yz)\,dy + xy\cos(yz)\,dz\). Rewrite the integral as \(\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}\), where \(\vec{F} = \langle\sin(\sin t\cdot t), (\cos t)\cdot t\cdot\cos(\sin t\cdot t), (\cos t)(\sin t)\cdot\cos(\sin t\cdot t)\rangle\). Now evaluate the dot product \(\vec{F}\cdot\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\): \(\sin(\sin t\cdot t)(-\sin t)+(\cos t)t\cos(\sin t\cdot t)(\cos t)+\cos(t)\sin(t)\cos(\sin t\cdot t)\)
05

Evaluate the integral

Evaluate the integral \(\int_0^{2\pi} [\sin(\sin t\cdot t)(-\sin t)+(\cos t)t\cos(\sin t\cdot t)(\cos t)+\cos(t)\sin(t)\cos(\sin t\cdot t)]dt\). Unfortunately, this integral does not have a closed-form expression. We can only approximate its value using numerical methods such as Simpson's Rule, Trapezoidal Rule, or even by using numerical softwares like Wolfram Alpha or Matlab.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Partial Derivatives
Partial derivatives are like finding the slope of a mountain in a particular direction. In multivariable calculus, they help us understand how a function changes as we adjust one of the variables while keeping the others constant.
For example, if we have a function \( f(x, y) \), the partial derivative \( \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \) tells us how \( f \) changes as \( x \) changes, with \( y \) held steady.
  • To check if an expression is an exact differential, we calculate these derivatives and see if they match in certain ways.
  • This concept is crucial for determining whether a path integral depends only on the endpoints, not the path itself.
Mastering partial derivatives allows you to explore more complex integrals and differentials with confidence.
Line Integrals
Line integrals involve summing values of a field along a curve or path, similar to how you might add up elevation changes while hiking. Imagine calculating the work done by a force field on an object moving along a path.
In mathematical terms, if \( \vec{F}(x, y, z) \) is a vector field and \( C \) is a path, the line integral is represented as \( \int_C \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r} \).
  • This integral is used for paths in space and helps describe phenomena such as fluid flow and electromagnetic fields.
  • The main idea is that the result depends on both the vector field and the path taken through it.
Line integrals become simpler and path-independent if the integrand is an exact differential, which is what makes them so fascinating.
Parameterization
Parameterization is a way to describe a curve or path using a single variable, often making complex paths easier to work with. For a given curve, expressing \( x \), \( y \), and \( z \) in terms of a parameter like \( t \) can define the entire curve.
An example is a helix, which can be parameterized as \( \vec{r}(t) = \langle \cos t, \sin t, t \rangle \). Here, \( t \) varies over a given range.
  • Parameterization helps simplify the computation of line integrals by converting multivariable problems into single-variable problems.
  • This technique also assists in handling curves that are not easily expressed solely in terms of Cartesian coordinates.
A good understanding of parameterization enables solving intricate mathematical problems with ease.
Numerical Integration
Numerical integration is like finding the area under a curve using approximations. It's especially useful when an integral can't be solved by standard analytical methods.
Consider a tricky integral with no closed-form solution. Methods like the Trapezoidal Rule or Simpson's Rule come into play here.
  • These methods work by dividing the area into shapes that are easy to calculate, such as trapezoids or parabolas.
  • Software and tools can provide numerical solutions by performing these calculations rapidly and accurately.
Numerical integration is an essential tool for engineers and scientists in fields where exact solutions are difficult or impossible to achieve.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(\mathbf{v}=\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) \mathbf{i}+(2 x y) \mathbf{j}\), evaluate \(\int_{C} v_{T} d s\) for the following paths: a) from \((0,0)\) to \((1,1)\) on the line \(y=x\), b) from \((0,0)\) to \((1,1)\) on the line \(y=x^{2}\); c) from \((0,0)\) to \((1,1)\) on the broken line with corner at \((1,0)\).

Let \(S\) be an oriented surface in space that is planar; that is, \(S\) lies in a plane. With \(S\) one can associate the vector \(\mathbf{S}\), which has the direction of the normal chosen on \(S\) and has a length equal to the area of \(S\). a) Show that if \(S_{1}, S_{2}, S_{3}, S_{4}\) are the faces of a tetrahedron, oriented so that the normal is the exterior normal, then $$ \mathbf{S}_{1}+\mathbf{S}_{2}+\mathbf{S}_{3}+\mathbf{S}_{4}=\mathbf{0} \text {. } $$ [Hint: Let \(\mathbf{S}_{i}=A_{i} \mathbf{n}_{i}\left(A_{i}>0\right)\) for \(i=1, \ldots, 4\) and let \(\mathbf{S}_{1}+\cdots+\mathbf{S}_{4}=\mathbf{b}\). Let \(p_{1}\) be the foot of the altitude on face \(S_{1}\) and join \(p_{1}\) to the vertices of \(S_{1}\) to form three triangles of areas \(A_{12}, \ldots, A_{14}\). Show that, for proper numbering, \(A_{1 j}=\pm A_{j} \mathbf{n}_{j} \cdot \mathbf{n}_{1}\), with \(+\) or - according as \(\mathbf{n}_{j} \cdot \mathbf{n}_{1}>0\) or \(<0\), and \(A_{1 j}=0\) if \(\mathbf{n}_{j} \cdot \mathbf{n}_{1}=0(j=2,3,4)\). Hence deduce that \(\mathbf{b} \cdot \mathbf{n}_{j}=0\) for \(j=2,3,4\) and thus \(\mathbf{b} \cdot \mathbf{b}=0\).] b) Show that the result of (a) extends to an arbitrary convex polyhedron with faces \(S_{1}, \ldots, S_{n}\), that is, that $$ \mathbf{S}_{1}+\mathbf{S}_{2}+\cdots+\mathbf{S}_{n}=\mathbf{0}, $$ when the orientation is that of the exterior normal. c) Using the result of (b), indicate a reasoning to justify the relation $$ \iint_{S} \mathbf{v} \cdot d \boldsymbol{\sigma}=0 $$ for any convex closed surface \(S\) (such as the surface of a sphere or ellipsoid), provided that \(\mathbf{v}\) is a constant vector. d) Apply the result of (b) to a triangular prism whose edges represent the vectors \(\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}\), \(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\), c to prove the distributive law (Equation (1.19) $$ \mathbf{c} \times(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b})=\mathbf{c} \times \mathbf{a}+\mathbf{c} \times \mathbf{b} $$ for the vector product. This is the method used by Gibbs (cf. the book by Gibbs listed at the end of this chapter).

Let \(D\) be a domain that has a finite number of "holes" at points \(A_{1}, A_{2}, \ldots, A_{k}\), so that \(D\) is ( \(k+1)\)-tuply connected; cf. Fig. 5.23. Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be continuous and have continuous derivatives in \(D\), with \(\partial P / \partial y=\partial Q / \partial x\) in \(D\). Let \(C_{1}\) denote a circle about \(A_{1}\) in \(D\), enclosing none of the other \(A^{\text {'s }}\). Let \(C_{2}\) be chosen similarly for \(A_{2}\), and so on. Let $$ \oint_{C_{1}} P d x+Q d y=\alpha_{1}, \oint_{C_{2}} P d x+Q d y=\alpha_{2} \ldots, \oint_{C_{k}} P d x+Q d y=\alpha_{k} $$ a) Show that if \(C\) is an arbitrary simple closed path in \(D\) enclosing \(A_{1}, A_{2} \ldots, A_{k}\), then $$ \oint_{C} P d x+Q d y=\alpha_{1}+\alpha_{2}+\cdots+\dot{u}_{k} $$ b) Determine all possible values of the integral $$ \int_{\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right)}^{\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right)} P d x+Q d y $$ between two fixed points of \(D\), if it is known that this integral has the value \(K\) for one particular path. 9\. Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be continuous and have continuous derivatives, with \(\partial P / \partial y=\partial Q / \partial x\), except at the points \((4,0),(0,0),(-4,0)\). Let \(C_{1}\) denote the circle \((x-2)^{2}+y^{2}=9\); let \(C_{2}\) denote the circle \((x+2)^{2}+y^{2}=9\); let \(C_{3}\) denote the circle \(x^{2}+y^{2}=25\). Given that $$ \oint_{C_{1}} P d x+Q d y=11, \quad \oint_{C_{2}} P d x+Q d y=9, \quad \oint_{C_{3}} P d x+Q d y=13 $$ find $$ \int_{C_{4}} P d x+Q d y $$ «s where \(C_{4}\) is the circle \(x^{2}+y^{2}=1\). [Hint: Use the result of Problem \(8(\) a).]

Transform the integrals, using the substitution given: a) \(\int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{y}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) d x d y, u=y, v=x\); b) \(\iint_{R_{T y}}(x-y) d x d y\), where \(R_{x y}\) is the region \(x^{2}+y^{2} \leq 1\), and \(x=u+\left(1-u^{2}-v^{2}\right)\), \(y=v+\left(1-u^{2}-v^{2}\right)\); (Hint: Use as \(R_{u v}\) the region \(u^{2}+v^{2} \leq 1\).) c) \(\iint_{R_{x y}} x y d x d y\), where \(R_{x y}\) is the region \(x^{2}+y^{2} \leq 1\) and \(x=u^{2}-v^{2}, y=2 u v\).

Let a wire occupying the line segment from \((0,-c)\) to \((0, c)\) in the \(x y\)-plane have a constant charge density equal to \(\rho\). Show that the electrostatic potential due to this wire at a point \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right)\) of the \(x y\)-plane is given by $$ \Phi=\rho \log \frac{\sqrt{x_{1}^{2}+\left(c-y_{1}\right)^{2}}+c-y_{1}}{\sqrt{x_{1}^{2}+\left(c+y_{1}\right)^{2}}-c-y_{1}}+k $$ where \(k\) is an arbitrary constant. Show that if \(k\) is chosen so that \(\Phi(1,0)=0\), then, as \(c\) becomes infinite, \(\Phi\) approaches the limiting value \(-2 \rho \log \left|x_{1}\right|\). This is the potential of an infinite wire with uniform charge.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free