Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let K be the ring that contains 6 as a subring. Show that px=3x2+16xhas no roots in K. Thus, Corollary 5.12 may be false if F is not a field. [Hint: If u were a root, then 0=2·3, and 3u2+1=0. Derive a contradiction.]

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is proved thatpx=3x2+16x has no roots in K.

Step by step solution

01

Statement of Exercise 3.2.17

Exercise 3.2.17states that if uisa unit in a ringR with an identity, then uwillnot be a zero divisor.

02

Show that px=3x2+1∈ℤ6x has no roots in K

Assume thatuis a root of px=3x2+1; therefore, 3u2+1=0. There is 1=3-u2, andas a result, 3 is a unit in K.

Moreover, 3·2=0; therefore, 3willbe a zero divisor in K, and xx2-33.

It is also observed thatx2-3contains a root in3(according toTheorem5.11).

This contradictsthe result that units in a ring with unity are not zero divisors.

Hence, it is provedpx=3x2+16x has no roots in K.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free