Chapter 17: Q12E (page 535)
Is the following relation an equivalence relation on
if and only if there exists such that .
Short Answer
We proved that is an equivalence relation.
Chapter 17: Q12E (page 535)
Is the following relation an equivalence relation on
if and only if there exists such that .
We proved that is an equivalence relation.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeLet G be a group and define if and only if there exists such that . Prove thatis an equivalence relation on G.
(a) If and are polynomials, show that their sum is a polynomial (that is, after some point all coordinates of the sum are zero).
(b) Show thatrole="math" localid="1658910018438" is a polynomial.
Let be subsets of . Prove De Morgan's laws:
(a)
(b)
In the set of all polynomials with real coefficients define if and only if , where ‘ denotes the derivative. Prove thatis an equivalence relation on.
What is wrong with the following "proof" that all roses are the same color. It suffices to prove the statement: In every set of n roses, all the roses in
the set are the same color. If n = 1, the statement is certainly true. Assume
the statement is true for n = k. Let S be a set of k + 1 roses. Remove one
rose (call it rose A) from S; there are k roses remaining, and they must all
be the same color by the induction hypothesis. Replace rose A and remove
a different rose (call it rose B). Once again there are k roses remaining that
must all be the same color by the induction hypothesis. Since the remaining
roses include rose A, all the roses in Shave the same color. This proves that
the statement is true when n = k + 1. Therefore, the statement is true for all
n by induction.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.