Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the proof of Case (2) of Theorem 4.1, show that R[x] is a subring of S[x] that contains R.

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is proved thatR[x] is a subring of S[x].

Step by step solution

01

Definition of integral domain 

The commutative ring with identity with no zero divisor is known as integral domain.

02

Show that R[x] is a subring of S[x] that contains R 

Consider theorem 4.1 as if Ris a ring then there exist ring Tcontaining an element xthat is not in Rand has these properties;

Ris a subring ofT , andxa=ax for everyaR

ConsiderR does not have identity and consider thatR[x] is not a subring ofS .

Consider thatS[x]=T the polynomial inS[x] . ButR is a subring of T, which is a contradiction of the assumption thatR[x] is not a subring of S. This implies thatR[x] is a subring of S[x].

Therefore, it is proved thatR[x] is a subring of S[x].

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let n be a positive integer. Suppose that there are three pegs and on one of them n rings are stacked, with each ring being smaller in diameter than the one below it, as shown here for n = 5:

The game is to transfer all the rings to another peg according to these rules:

(i) only one ring may be moved at a time; (ii) a ring may be moved to any

peg but may never be placed on top of a smaller ring; (iii) the final order of

the rings on the new peg must be the same as their original order on the first

peg. Prove that the game can be completed in 2n-1 moves and cannot be

completed in fewer moves.

Let [π] be the set of all real numbers of the form,r0+r1π+r2π2++rnπn where n0and each role="math" localid="1658915882981" ri.

a. Show that [π]is a subring of role="math" localid="1658915951771" .

b. Assume that r0+r1π+r2π2++rnπn=0 if and only if each ri=0. (This fact was first proved in 1882; the proof is beyond the scope of this book.) Prove thatrole="math" localid="1658916066626" [π] is isomorphic to the polynomial ring role="math" localid="1658916075331" [x].

Prove that 3 is a factor of4n-1for every positive integer n.

What is wrong with the following "proof" that all roses are the same color. It suffices to prove the statement: In every set of n roses, all the roses in

the set are the same color. If n = 1, the statement is certainly true. Assume

the statement is true for n = k. Let S be a set of k + 1 roses. Remove one

rose (call it rose A) from S; there are k roses remaining, and they must all

be the same color by the induction hypothesis. Replace rose A and remove

a different rose (call it rose B). Once again there are k roses remaining that

must all be the same color by the induction hypothesis. Since the remaining

roses include rose A, all the roses in Shave the same color. This proves that

the statement is true when n = k + 1. Therefore, the statement is true for all

n by induction.

(a) Prove that the following relation on the set R of real numbers is an equivalence relation:a~b if and only ifcosa=cosb .

(b) Describe the equivalence class of 0 and the equivalence class ofπ/2 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free