Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Give a complete inductive proof of the result $$ \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^{3}=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} i\right)^{2} $$ and compare with al-Karaji's proof.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Based on the provided inductive proof, we can deduce that the sum of the first n natural numbers cubed is equal to the square of the sum of the first n natural numbers. In other words, $$ \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^{3}=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} i\right)^{2} $$ This shows a close relationship between the sum of cubes of the first n natural numbers and the sum of the first n natural numbers.

Step by step solution

01

Base Case:

For the base case, we need to prove that the given result holds true for n = 1: $$ \sum_{i=1}^{1} i^3 = \left(\sum_{i=1}^{1} i\right)^2 $$ Substitute n = 1 in the equation: $$ 1^3 = (1)^{2} $$ Since both sides are equal to 1, the base case is proven to be true.
02

Inductive Hypothesis:

Now, we will assume the given result holds true for n = k: $$ \sum_{i=1}^{k} i^{3}=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{k} i\right)^{2} $$ Our goal is to prove the result for n = k + 1.
03

Inductive Step:

For the inductive step, we need to prove the result holds true for n = k + 1: $$ \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} i^{3}=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} i\right)^{2} $$ The left side of the equation can be rewritten as: $$ \sum_{i=1}^{k} i^{3} + (k+1)^3 $$ Using the inductive hypothesis, we can replace the summation with the square of the sum: $$ \left(\sum_{i=1}^{k} i\right)^2 + (k+1)^3 $$ The right side of the equation can be rewritten as: $$ \left[ \left(\sum_{i=1}^{k} i\right) + (k+1) \right]^{ 2 } $$ Now we need to show that these two expressions are equal: $$ \left(\sum_{i=1}^{k} i\right)^2 + (k+1)^3 = \left[ \left(\sum_{i=1}^{k} i\right) + (k+1) \right]^{ 2 } $$ Notice that: $$ \left(\sum_{i=1}^{k} i\right) = \frac{k(k+1)}{2} $$ Plug this in: $$ \left(\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right)^2 + (k+1)^3 = \left[\left(\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right) + (k+1)\right]^{ 2 } $$ Simplify both sides: $$ \frac{k^2(k+1)^2}{4} + (k+1)^3 = \left[\frac{k(k+1)}{2} + 2(k+1)\right]^{2} $$ Multiplying both sides by 4: $$ k^2(k+1)^2 + 4(k+1)^3 = 4\left[\frac{k(k+1)}{2} + 2(k+1)\right]^{2} $$ Let \(x = (k+1)\): $$ k^2x^2 + 4x^3 = 4\left[\frac{kx}{2} + 2x\right]^{2} $$ Simplify the right side (factoring out x): $$ k^2x^2 + 4x^3 = 4x^2\left(\frac{k}{2} + 2\right)^2 $$ Divide both sides by \(x^2\): $$ k^2 + 4x = 4\left(\frac{k}{2} + 2\right)^2 $$ Expand the right side: $$ k^2 + 4x = 4\left(\frac{k^2}{4} + 2k + 4\right) $$ Simplify: $$ k^2 + 4x = k^2 + 8k + 16 $$ Now, let \(x = (k+1)\): $$ k^2 + 4(k+1) = k^2 + 8k + 16 $$ Notice that both sides of the equation are equal: $$ k^2 + 4k + 4 = k^2 + 8k + 16 $$ Thus, the inductive step is proven to be true. Now, we have the complete inductive proof of the result: $$ \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^{3}=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} i\right)^{2} $$ Comparing our proof to al-Karaji's proof, we can observe that both follow the same inductive methodology, but al-Karaji uses geometric interpretations and arguments, whereas our proof uses algebraic manipulations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Series and Sequences
Series and sequences are fundamental concepts in mathematics that are essential for understanding patterns and accumulations. A sequence is an ordered list of numbers, where each number is called a term. A series, on the other hand, is the sum of the terms of a sequence.
Here are some key aspects of these concepts:
  • Arithmetic Sequences: These are sequences with a constant difference between consecutive terms. For example, the sequence 2, 4, 6, 8 is arithmetic with a common difference of 2.
  • Geometric Sequences: These are sequences where each term is obtained by multiplying the previous term by a constant factor. For instance, the sequence 3, 9, 27 is geometric with a common ratio of 3.
  • Convergence and Divergence: A series converges if the sum of its infinite terms approaches a finite limit, while it diverges if it grows indefinitely.
Understanding how to manipulate these sequences and their sums is crucial for solving complex mathematical problems, as seen in proving the sum of cubes.
Sum of Cubes
The sum of cubes is a specific type of series that is significant in mathematical induction and number theory. It refers to the sum of the cubes of the first n natural numbers. The interesting identity related to the sum of cubes is given by:\[ \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^{3} = \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} i\right)^{2} \]This formula states that the sum of cubes of the first n numbers equals the square of the sum of these numbers. The proof involves using algebra to show that both sides of the equation are indeed equal by expanding and simplifying expressions.
Some points about this sum:
  • Visual Patterns: This formula can also be seen visually by arranging cubes in geometric forms.
  • Applications: It is frequently used in calculus, algebra, and combinatorics.
  • Computational Techniques: Efficient computation of this sum plays a role in computer algorithms, especially those involved in statistical analyses and data science.
Proof Techniques
Proof techniques are logical tools used to verify the truth of mathematical statements. Mathematical induction, a key proof technique, is akin to climbing a ladder: proving a base case and then showing that if one step is correct, the next step also holds true.
Here's a simple overview of induction:
  • Base Case: Prove the statement is true for the initial value, usually when \(n = 1\).
  • Inductive Hypothesis: Assume the statement holds for some arbitrary number \(k\).
  • Inductive Step: Prove that if the statement is true for \(k\), then it must be true for \(k + 1\).
By validating the statement for the base case and establishing its truth under the assumption that it holds for \(k\), the statement is shown to be true for all natural numbers. This method is extensively useful in proofs involving series, sequences, and other recursive structures.
Historical Mathematics
Historical mathematics involves the exploration and study of mathematical concepts through a historical lens. It provides insight into how mathematical ideas have developed over time and the contexts in which they were discovered. One noted mathematician in historical mathematics related to series is al-Karaji.
His contributions include:
  • Development of Algebra: al-Karaji was an influential figure in early algebraic studies and contributed to methods that resemble modern algebraic proofs.
  • Geometric Interpretations: al-Karaji used geometric methods to relay mathematical proofs, showing the elegant intertwining of algebra and geometry.
  • Influence on Later Works: His work laid the foundation for many future mathematicians in Islamic and Western contexts.
By comparing our modern proofs with those of historical figures like al-Karaji, we can appreciate the evolution of mathematical thought and various techniques that have been refined and built upon over centuries.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free