Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(\rho(v)=R(v) / R(0)\) be the correlation function of a covariance stationary process \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\), where $$ X_{n+1}=a_{1} X_{n}+a_{2} X_{n-1}+\xi_{n+1} $$ for constants \(a_{13} a_{2}\) and zero mean uncorrelated random variables \(\left\\{\xi_{n}\right\\}\), for which \(E\left[\xi_{n}^{2}\right]=\sigma^{2}\) and \(E\left[\xi_{n} X_{n-k}\right]=0, k=1,2, \ldots .\) Establish that \(\rho(v)\) satisfies the so-called Yule-Walker equations $$ \rho(1)=a_{1}+a_{2} \rho(1), \quad \text { and } \quad \rho(2)=a_{1} \rho(1)+a_{2} $$ Determine \(a_{1}\) and \(a_{2}\) in terms of \(\rho(1)\) and \(\rho(2)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, for the covariance stationary process \(X_{n+1}=a_{1} X_{n}+a_{2} X_{n-1}+\xi_{n+1}\), the correlation function \(\rho(v)\) satisfies the Yule-Walker equations: $$ \rho(1) = a_1 + a_2 \rho(1) \\ \rho(2) = a_1 \rho(1) + a_2 \\ $$ Furthermore, the constants \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) can be determined in terms of \(\rho(1)\) and \(\rho(2)\) as follows: $$ a_2 = \frac{\rho(1)(\rho(2)-\rho(1))}{1-\rho(1)^2} \\ a_1 = \frac{\rho(2)-\rho(1) a_2}{\rho(1)} $$

Step by step solution

01

Deriving Covariance relations from the given process equation

To start, we can first multiply both sides of the given equation by \(X_{n-m}\) for some integer \(m\), and then take the expectations: $$ E[X_{n+1}X_{n-m}] = a_1 E[X_nX_{n-m}] + a_2 E[X_{n-1}X_{n-m}] + E[\xi_{n+1} X_{n-m}] $$ Now, we will consider 3 cases: \(m=0\), \(m=1\), and \(m=2\).
02

Calculate correlation for m=0,1,2 using given conditions

Case 1: \(m=0\) $$ E[X_{n+1} X_n] = a_1 E[X_n^2] + a_2 E[X_{n-1}X_n] + E[\xi_{n+1}X_n] $$ We are given that \(E[\xi_{n+1} X_n] = 0\), so we can rewrite as: $$ E[X_{n+1} X_n] = a_1 E[X_n^2] + a_2 E[X_{n-1}X_n] $$ Case 2: \(m=1\) $$ E[X_{n+1} X_{n-1}] = a_1 E[X_nX_{n-1}] + a_2 E[X_{n-1}^2] + E[\xi_{n+1} X_{n-1}] $$ We are given that \(E[\xi_{n+1} X_{n-1}] = 0\), so we can rewrite as: $$ E[X_{n+1} X_{n-1}] = a_1 E[X_nX_{n-1}] + a_2 E[X_{n-1}^2] $$ Case 3: \(m=2\) $$ E[X_{n+1} X_{n-2}] = a_1 E[X_nX_{n-2}] + a_2 E[X_{n-1}X_{n-2}] + E[\xi_{n+1} X_{n-2}] $$ We are given that \(E[\xi_{n+1} X_{n-2}] = 0\), so we can rewrite as: $$ E[X_{n+1} X_{n-2}] = a_1 E[X_nX_{n-2}] + a_2 E[X_{n-1}X_{n-2}] $$
03

Expressing Expectations as Correlations

We can now rewrite these expressions in terms of the correlation function \(\rho(v)\) as follows: Case 1: $$ R(1) = a_1 R(0) + a_2 R(1) \implies \rho(1) = a_1 + a_2 \rho(1) $$ Case 2: $$ R(2) = a_1 R(1) + a_2 R(0) \implies \rho(2) = a_1 \rho(1) + a_2 $$
04

Solving for a1 and a2 in terms of rho(1) and rho(2)

We now have a system of equations in terms of \(a_1\) and \(a_2\): $$ \rho(1) = a_1 + a_2 \rho(1) \\ \rho(2) = a_1 \rho(1) + a_2 \\ $$ We can solve this system of equations for \(a_1\) and \(a_2\): $$ a_2 = \frac{\rho(1)(\rho(2)-\rho(1))}{1-\rho(1)^2} \\ a_1 = \frac{\rho(2)-\rho(1) a_2}{\rho(1)} $$ This gives the values of \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) in terms of \(\rho(1)\) and \(\rho(2)\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Covariance Stationary Process
A covariance stationary process, often simply called a stationary process, is a concept crucial to understanding time series analysis in the field of statistics and signal processing. The stationary process has a consistent mean, variance, and autocovariance that are independent of time. This means that no matter at what point you start observing the process, these properties remain unchanged.

For instance, if we take any two points within the time series data, the covariance between them only depends on the distance or lag between these points and not on their actual position in time. The ability to predict future values based on past observations is a strong attribute that is facilitated by a process being stationary.

It is also important to note that the concept of stationarity is fundamental when dealing with the Yule-Walker equations. These are a set of linear equations that provide us a way to estimate the parameters of an autoregressive model—a model where future values are regressed on the past values. The example provided in the exercise demonstrates a process that is assumed to be stationary, and it is on this premise that we can apply the Yule-Walker equations to find the constants in the model.
Correlation Function
The correlation function, sometimes referred to as the autocorrelation function, is a tool that measures the linear relationship between different points in a time series separated by a certain lag. Mathematically, it is defined as the expected value of the product of the values of a process at two different times.

The function is used to detect any non-randomness in data, to identify an appropriate model for the data, or to estimate parameters within a model. In the exercise, \( \rho(v) \), represents the normalized correlation function for a given lag \( v \). This function is pivotal in understanding the strength and the form of the relationship a random process has with itself over time.

In practice, the correlation function helps us express expectations of product terms, such as \( E[X_{n+1} X_{n-m}] \), in terms of correlations, which then allows us to make use of the Yule-Walker equations effectively.
Stochastic Processes
A stochastic process is a collection of random variables indexed by time or space—think of it as a random process evolving over time. It's the mathematical counterpart for phenomena that unfold unpredictably and are subject to randomness. Examples include stock market fluctuations, signal noise in communications, and even the movements of particles in physics.

Each realization of a stochastic process could be entirely different from another realization because of the inherent randomness, yet some processes exhibit structure in this randomness. For instance, the time series described by the exercise is a type of stochastic process known as an autoregressive process, where the future value incorporates past values along with some noise.

Understanding stochastic processes involves not just predicting future values but also comprehending the underlying structure and probability laws governing the process. When we characterize processes as 'covariance stationary', it eases their study since a lot can be deduced from a few stationary properties, such as through the use of the Yule-Walker equations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A stochastie process \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) is said to be weakly mixing if, for all sets \(A, B\) of real sequences \(\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots\right)\), $$ \begin{aligned} &\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=1}^{n} \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\left(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots\right) \in A \quad \text { and }\left(X_{k}, X_{k+1}, \ldots\right) \in B\right\\} \\ &=\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\left(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots\right) \in A\right\\} \times \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\left(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots\right) \in B\right\\} \end{aligned} $$ Show that every weakly mixing process is ergodic. Remark: To verify weakly mixing, it suffices to show, for every \(m=1,2, \ldots\), and all sets \(A, B\) of vectors \(\left(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{m}\right)\), that $$ \begin{aligned} &\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=1}^{n} \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\left(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{m}\right) \in A \quad \text { and }\left(X_{k+1}, \ldots, X_{k+m}\right) \in B\right\\} \\ &=\operatorname{Pr}\left(\left(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{m}\right) \in A\right\\} \times \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\left(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{m}\right) \in B\right\\} \end{aligned} $$

Compute the spectral density funetion of the moving average process $$ X_{n}=\xi_{n}+\alpha_{1} \xi_{n-1} $$ Answer: $$ f(\lambda)=\frac{1+\alpha_{1}^{2}+2 \alpha_{1} \cos \lambda}{2 \pi\left(1+\alpha_{1}^{2}\right)} $$ where \(\left\\{\xi_{n}\right\\}\) are uncorrelated zero-mean random variables having unit variance.

Suppose $$ W_{n}=\sum_{j=1}^{4} \sigma_{j} \sqrt{2} \cos \left(\lambda_{j} n-V_{j}\right) $$ where \(\sigma_{j}, \lambda_{j}\) are positive constants, \(j=1, \ldots, q\), and \(V_{1}, \ldots, V_{g}\) are independent, uniformly distributed in the interval \((0,2 \pi)\). Show that \(\left\\{W_{n}\right\\}\) is covariance stationary and compute the covariance function.

Let \(Z\) be a random variable uniformly distributed on \([0,1) .\) Let \(X_{0}=Z\) and \(X_{n+1}=2 X_{n}(\bmod 1)\) that is, $$ X_{n+1}= \begin{cases}2 X_{n} & \text { if } \quad X_{n}<\frac{1}{2} \\ 2 X_{n}-1 & \text { if } \quad X_{n} \geq \frac{1}{2}\end{cases} $$ (a) Show that if \(Z=. Z_{0} Z_{1} Z_{2} \ldots\) is the terminating binary expansion for \(Z=\) \(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 2^{-(k+1)} Z_{k}\), then \(X_{n}=. Z_{n} Z_{n+1} \ldots .\) (b) Show that \(X_{n}\) is a stationary process. (c) Show that \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) is ergodic. (d) Use the ergodic theorem to show that with probability one $$ \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\left\\{2^{k} Z\right\\} \rightarrow \frac{1}{2} $$ where \(\\{x\\}\) is the fractional part of \(x(\\{x\\}=x-[x]\) with \([x]\) the largest integer not exceeding \(x\) ).

Find the minimum mean square error linear predictor of \(X_{n+1}\) given \(X_{n}\), \(X_{n-1}, \ldots, X_{0}\) in the following nonstationary linear model: \(\theta_{0}, \zeta_{1}, \zeta_{2}, \ldots\), and \(\varepsilon_{0}, \varepsilon_{1}, \ldots\) are all uncorrelated with zero means. The variances are \(E\left[\theta_{0}^{2}\right]=v_{0}^{2}\), \(E\left[\zeta_{k}^{2}\right]=v^{2}\), and \(E\left[\varepsilon_{k}^{2}\right]=\sigma^{2}\), where \(v^{2}=\alpha v_{0}^{2}, \alpha=v_{0}^{2}\left(v_{0}^{2}+\sigma^{2}\right) .\) Finally, \(X_{n}=\) \(\theta_{n}+\varepsilon_{n}\), where \(\theta_{n+1}=\theta_{n}+\zeta_{n+1}, n=0,1, \ldots\) (We interpret \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) as a noise distorted observation on the \(\theta\) process.) Answer: $$ \begin{aligned} &\hat{X}_{0}=0 \\ &\hat{X}_{k}=\alpha X_{k-1}+(1-\alpha) X_{k-1}, \text { for } k=1,2, \ldots \end{aligned} $$ where \(\alpha=v_{0}^{2} /\left(v_{0}^{2}+\sigma^{2}\right) .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free