Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(\left\\{\xi_{n}\right\\}\) be independent identically distributed random variables having zero means and unit variances. Show that every moving average $$ X_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{m} a_{k} \xi_{n-k+} \quad n=0, \pm 1, \ldots $$ is ergodic. Suppose \(\sum a_{k}^{2}<\infty .\) Is the same true of $$ Y_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_{k} \xi_{n-k} ? $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, for the moving average \(X_n\), we have shown that it is stationary and its autocorrelation converges to zero as the time difference goes to infinity, which proves that it is ergodic. However, for the infinite moving average \(Y_n\), we can't provide a general conclusion on its ergodicity. The ergodicity of \(Y_n\) will depend on the specific coefficients \(a_k\), and it's possible for \(Y_n\) to be ergodic under certain conditions, where the sum of squares of coefficients \(\sum a_k^2\) is finite.

Step by step solution

01

Prove \(X_n\) is stationary

Stationarity is characterized by having constant mean value and autocovariance that only depends on the time difference. Given that the random variables \(\xi_n\) have zero means and unit variances (given), we can show that \(X_n\) is stationary. Mean of \(X_n\): \[E[X_n] = E\left[\sum_{k=0}^m a_k \xi_{n-k}\right] = \sum_{k=0}^m a_k E[\xi_{n-k}] = 0\] Now calculate the autocovariance function \(R(n, n + \tau) = E[X_n X_{n + \tau}]\). \[R(n, n + \tau) = E\left[\left(\sum_{k=0}^m a_k \xi_{n-k}\right)\left(\sum_{j=0}^m a_j \xi_{n + \tau - j}\right)\right]\] Since \(\xi_n\) are uncorrelated random variables, the covariance of distinct random variables is zero, so only terms with matching indices will contribute to the sum. \[R(n, n+\tau) = \sum_{k=0}^m \sum_{j=0}^m a_k a_j E[\xi_{n-k}\xi_{n+\tau-j}]\] Thus, the autocovariance only depends on the time difference \(\tau\). This shows that \(X_n\) is stationary, as both its mean and autocovariance are constant or only depend on \(\tau\).
02

Prove the limit of autocorrelation converges to zero

Now, we need to show that the limit of the autocorrelation converges to zero as \(\tau \rightarrow \infty\). The autocorrelation function can be defined as: \[r(n, n+\tau) = \frac{R(n, n+\tau)}{\sqrt{R(n, n)R(n+\tau, n+\tau)}}\] Utilizing the autocovariance function \(R(n, n+\tau)\) derived earlier and the fact that \(R(n, n) = \sum_{k=0}^m a_k^2\), we can complete the calculations. We know that: \[r(n, n+\tau) \rightarrow 0\quad\textrm{if}\quad \tau \rightarrow \infty\] Since we have a finite summation in \(X_n\), as the time difference \(\tau\) goes to infinity, terms with matching indices will tend to zero, meaning the numerator of the autocorrelation function will go to zero. The denominator will remain constant for a finite sum \(R(n, n) = \sum_{k=0}^m a_k^2\). So, the limit of the autocorrelation converges to zero, proving that \(X_n\) is ergodic.
03

Analyze the ergodicity of \(Y_n\)

For the autocovariance function of \(Y_n\), the calculation is similar to the one in step 1, but this time, the summation is infinite. In this case, the condition for ergodicity states that \(\sum a_k^2 < \infty\). Mean of \(Y_n\): \[E[Y_n] = E\left[\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k \xi_{n-k}\right] = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k E[\xi_{n-k}] = 0\] Additionally, the autocovariance of \(Y_n\): \[R(n, n + \tau) = E\left[\left(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k \xi_{n-k}\right)\left(\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} a_j \xi_{n + \tau - j}\right)\right]\] \[R(n, n+\tau) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} a_k a_j E[\xi_{n-k}\xi_{n+\tau-j}]\] As with step 2, we need to show that the limit of the autocorrelation converges to zero. However, since the summation is now infinite, it's not guaranteed that the limit converges to zero for all cases. The given condition, \(\sum a_k^2 < \infty\), could suffice to determine the ergodicity of the series for a specific set of \(a_k\) coefficients. Summing up, for \(Y_n\), we can't provide a general conclusion about ergodicity. The ergodicity of \(Y_n\) will depend on the specific \(a_k\) coefficients, and given the conditions, it's possible for \(Y_n\) to be ergodic.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\left\\{X_{k}\right\\}\) be a moving average process $$ X_{n}=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \alpha_{j} \xi_{n-j}, \quad \alpha_{0}=1, \quad \sum_{=0}^{\infty} \alpha_{j}^{2}<\infty $$ where \(\left\\{\xi_{n}\right\\}\) are zero-mean independent random variables having common variance \(\sigma^{2}\). Show that $$ U_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n} X_{k-1} \bar{\xi}_{k}, \quad n=0,1, \ldots $$ and $$ V_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n} X_{k} \xi_{h}-(n+1) \sigma^{2}, \quad n=0,1, \ldots $$ are martingales with respect to \(\left\\{\zeta_{n}\right\\}\).

Let \(\\{B(t) ; 0 \leq t \leq 1\\}\) be a standard Brownian motion process and let \(B(I)=B(t)-B(s)\), for \(I=(s, t], 0 \leq s \leq t \leq 1\) be the aseociated Gaussian random measure. Validate the identity $$ E\left[\exp \left\\{\lambda \int_{0}^{1} f(s) d B(s)\right\\}\right]=\exp \left\\{\frac{1}{2} \lambda^{2} \int_{0}^{1} f^{2}(s) d s\right\\},-\infty<\lambda<\infty $$ where \(f(s), 0 \leq s \leq 1\) is a continuous funetion.

Let \(\rho(v)=R(v) / R(0)\) be the correlation function of a covariance stationary process \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\), where $$ X_{n+1}=a_{1} X_{n}+a_{2} X_{n-1}+\xi_{n+1} $$ for constants \(a_{13} a_{2}\) and zero mean uncorrelated random variables \(\left\\{\xi_{n}\right\\}\), for which \(E\left[\xi_{n}^{2}\right]=\sigma^{2}\) and \(E\left[\xi_{n} X_{n-k}\right]=0, k=1,2, \ldots .\) Establish that \(\rho(v)\) satisfies the so-called Yule-Walker equations $$ \rho(1)=a_{1}+a_{2} \rho(1), \quad \text { and } \quad \rho(2)=a_{1} \rho(1)+a_{2} $$ Determine \(a_{1}\) and \(a_{2}\) in terms of \(\rho(1)\) and \(\rho(2)\)

Let \(\left\\{X_{s}\right\\}\) be a finite-state irreducible Markov chain having the transition probabilities \(\| P_{i j} \mid N_{i, j=1^{*}}\). There then exists a stationary distribution \(\pi\), i.e., a vector \(\pi(1), \ldots, \pi(N)\) satisfying \(\pi(i) \geq 0, i=1, \ldots, N, \sum_{i=1}^{N} \pi(i)=1\), and $$ \pi(j)=\sum_{i=1}^{N} \pi(i) P_{i j}, \quad j=1, \ldots, N $$ Suppose \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{X_{0}=i\right\\}=\pi(i), i=1, \ldots, N\). Show that \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) is weakly mixing, hence ergodic.

Compute the spectral density function of the autoregressive process \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) satisfying $$ X_{n}=\beta_{1} X_{n-1}+\cdots+\beta_{4} X_{n-4}+\xi_{n} $$ where \(\left\\{\xi_{n}\right\\}\) are uncorrelated zero-mean random variables having unit variance. Assume the \(q\) roots of \(x^{4}-\beta_{1} x^{4-1} \cdots-\beta_{q}=0\) are all less than one in absolute value. Answer: $$ f(\omega)=\left\\{2 \pi \sigma_{x}^{2}\left|1-\sum_{k=1}^{4} \beta_{k} e^{i k \omega}\right|^{2}\right\\}^{-1},-\pi<\omega<\pi $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free